Rutinas de la experiencia común. El artista Spinoziano como productor

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
D. Tatián
{"title":"Rutinas de la experiencia común. El artista Spinoziano como productor","authors":"D. Tatián","doi":"10.32735/s0718-2201202000050795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present work explores the status of art in the philosophy of Spinoza (aspect scarcely studied by critics), within the framework of the Copernican revolution that gives rise to aesthetics (the “secondary qualities” are not qualities of objects but effects in the subjects who perceive) and the Dutch Baroque. Although the Spinozist thought is inscribed in the anthropological conversion by virtue of which beauty turns out to be an effect on the subject and not a property of objects, its understanding of art is unassimilable to \"aesthetics\" as a differentiated and autonomous area that it was consolidated in the eighteenth century, and rather conceived art integrated to life and common experience –at the same time, as praxis of bodily origin within the reach of anyone, presents points of contact with the historical avant-gardes of the twentieth century–. Spinoza conceives the production of \"artworks\" less as an aesthetic fact than as a body activity ethically oriented to the good life.","PeriodicalId":43217,"journal":{"name":"Alpha-Revista de Artes Letras y Filosofia","volume":"144 1","pages":"323-344"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alpha-Revista de Artes Letras y Filosofia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32735/s0718-2201202000050795","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The present work explores the status of art in the philosophy of Spinoza (aspect scarcely studied by critics), within the framework of the Copernican revolution that gives rise to aesthetics (the “secondary qualities” are not qualities of objects but effects in the subjects who perceive) and the Dutch Baroque. Although the Spinozist thought is inscribed in the anthropological conversion by virtue of which beauty turns out to be an effect on the subject and not a property of objects, its understanding of art is unassimilable to "aesthetics" as a differentiated and autonomous area that it was consolidated in the eighteenth century, and rather conceived art integrated to life and common experience –at the same time, as praxis of bodily origin within the reach of anyone, presents points of contact with the historical avant-gardes of the twentieth century–. Spinoza conceives the production of "artworks" less as an aesthetic fact than as a body activity ethically oriented to the good life.
常见的经验例程。作为制作人的斯宾诺莎艺术家
目前的工作探讨了艺术在斯宾诺莎哲学中的地位(批评家几乎没有研究过的方面),在哥白尼革命的框架内产生了美学(“次要品质”不是物体的品质,而是感知主体的影响)和荷兰巴洛克。尽管斯宾诺莎的思想在人类学的转变中被铭记,通过这种转变,美被证明是对主体的一种影响,而不是客体的一种属性,但它对艺术的理解与“美学”是不可同化的,作为一种区分和自主的领域,它在18世纪得到了巩固,而是将艺术设想为与生活和共同经验相结合的艺术——同时,作为任何人都能接触到的身体起源的实践,呈现了与二十世纪历史先锋派的接触点。斯宾诺莎认为“艺术品”的生产与其说是一种审美事实,不如说是一种以美好生活为导向的身体活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alpha-Revista de Artes Letras y Filosofia
Alpha-Revista de Artes Letras y Filosofia HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信