Community wellbeing in the built environment: towards a relational building assessment

Norene Lach, S. McDonald, Sylvia Coleman, M. Touchie, John Robinson, Garrett T. Morgan, Blake Poland, Alstan Jakubiec
{"title":"Community wellbeing in the built environment: towards a relational building assessment","authors":"Norene Lach, S. McDonald, Sylvia Coleman, M. Touchie, John Robinson, Garrett T. Morgan, Blake Poland, Alstan Jakubiec","doi":"10.1080/23748834.2022.2097827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Community Wellbeing (CW) in the built environment is acknowledged as being ‘greater than the sum of its parts’, a process that emerges when residents negotiate understandings of community within shared spaces. However, methods of evaluation have not caught up. In practice, evaluation methods and frameworks measure CW as an aggregate of individual wellbeing, and operate as a ‘pick and mix’ of dimensions and indicators. Such an approach fails to capture the resident experience as it emerges from (and is shaped by) the local community context. To bridge the gap between theory and practice, we advance participatory mixed methods to integrate CW theory with current building performance assessment methods in support of the development of a novel, evidence-based tool. The first section covers the shift from an aggregate to relational conceptual framework, employing a social practice theory lens to acknowledge how CW emerges from individual and collective interactions. We then situate CW within current building performance assessment methods by reviewing seven CW frameworks. Finally, we recommend improvements to CW assessment based on our own research, including participatory methods, local community engagement, and Photovoice.","PeriodicalId":72596,"journal":{"name":"Cities & health","volume":"74 1","pages":"1193 - 1211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities & health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2022.2097827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT Community Wellbeing (CW) in the built environment is acknowledged as being ‘greater than the sum of its parts’, a process that emerges when residents negotiate understandings of community within shared spaces. However, methods of evaluation have not caught up. In practice, evaluation methods and frameworks measure CW as an aggregate of individual wellbeing, and operate as a ‘pick and mix’ of dimensions and indicators. Such an approach fails to capture the resident experience as it emerges from (and is shaped by) the local community context. To bridge the gap between theory and practice, we advance participatory mixed methods to integrate CW theory with current building performance assessment methods in support of the development of a novel, evidence-based tool. The first section covers the shift from an aggregate to relational conceptual framework, employing a social practice theory lens to acknowledge how CW emerges from individual and collective interactions. We then situate CW within current building performance assessment methods by reviewing seven CW frameworks. Finally, we recommend improvements to CW assessment based on our own research, including participatory methods, local community engagement, and Photovoice.
建筑环境中的社区福祉:迈向关系建筑评估
建筑环境中的社区福祉(CW)被认为是“大于其部分的总和”,这是一个居民在共享空间中协商社区理解的过程。然而,评价方法并没有跟上。在实践中,评估方法和框架将CW衡量为个人福祉的总和,并作为维度和指标的“挑选和混合”运作。这种方法未能捕捉到居民的体验,因为它是从当地社区环境中产生的(并受其影响)。为了弥合理论与实践之间的差距,我们提出了参与式混合方法,将连续建筑理论与当前的建筑性能评估方法相结合,以支持开发一种新颖的、基于证据的工具。第一部分涵盖了从总体到关系概念框架的转变,采用社会实践理论的视角来认识文化创新是如何从个人和集体的互动中产生的。然后,我们通过回顾七个连续化学框架,将连续化学置于当前建筑性能评估方法中。最后,基于我们自己的研究,我们建议改进CW评估,包括参与式方法、当地社区参与和Photovoice。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信