Isolation and In Vitro Evaluation of Bacteriophage against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from Burn wounds

M. Hallajzadeh, A. Mojtahedi, V. Mahabadi, N. Amirmozafari
{"title":"Isolation and In Vitro Evaluation of Bacteriophage against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from Burn wounds","authors":"M. Hallajzadeh, A. Mojtahedi, V. Mahabadi, N. Amirmozafari","doi":"10.36648/1989-8436.10.6.98","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major threat to human health. It is considered to be a Multi-Drug Resistant (MDR) pathogen capable of causing a variety of diseases. MRSA is also one of the most important nosocomial pathogens in burn infection. As a treatment strategy against MRSA infections phage therapy has the potential of becoming alternative remedy. Thus, the aim of present study was to isolate and characterize lytic bacteriophage from hospital sewage effective against burn wounds infecting MRSA isolates. Materials and methods: Staphylococcus aureus strains were isolated from hospitalized burnt patients. Strains were confirmed as MRSA by Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion tests to penicillin, methicillin, and oxacillin and also PCR assay for mecA gene. Phage was isolated from hospital sewage sample and tittered by Double Layer Agar (DLA) method. Spot test was used for host range determination. The latent period and burst size were estimated from one step growth curve. Phage morphology was observed by electron microscopy. The nature of the nucleic acid of isolated bacteriophage was confirmed by using Rnase A, Dnase I and 6 restriction enzymes. Results: The titer, latent period and burst size of the isolated phage was determined to be 1×109 PFU/ml, 20 min and 190 PFU per infected cell, respectively. It displayed a wide host range for MRSA bacteria by spot test (27 isolate from 30).Electron microscopy observation demonstrated that the phage belonged myoviridea family. Digestion profiles of Rnase A, Dnase I and XbaI restriction enzyme on 1% agarose gel Electrophoresis, show that the genome of isolated phage was a double-stranded DNA with a size of <∼43 kbp. Conclusion: The isolated phage was active against a wide range of MRSA strains recovered from burnt patients. Therefore it can be considered as a suitable candidate for use in prophylaxis and treatment of these clinical infections and for the preparation of anti-staphylococcal cocktails.","PeriodicalId":8142,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Microbiology","volume":"19 3-4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36648/1989-8436.10.6.98","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major threat to human health. It is considered to be a Multi-Drug Resistant (MDR) pathogen capable of causing a variety of diseases. MRSA is also one of the most important nosocomial pathogens in burn infection. As a treatment strategy against MRSA infections phage therapy has the potential of becoming alternative remedy. Thus, the aim of present study was to isolate and characterize lytic bacteriophage from hospital sewage effective against burn wounds infecting MRSA isolates. Materials and methods: Staphylococcus aureus strains were isolated from hospitalized burnt patients. Strains were confirmed as MRSA by Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion tests to penicillin, methicillin, and oxacillin and also PCR assay for mecA gene. Phage was isolated from hospital sewage sample and tittered by Double Layer Agar (DLA) method. Spot test was used for host range determination. The latent period and burst size were estimated from one step growth curve. Phage morphology was observed by electron microscopy. The nature of the nucleic acid of isolated bacteriophage was confirmed by using Rnase A, Dnase I and 6 restriction enzymes. Results: The titer, latent period and burst size of the isolated phage was determined to be 1×109 PFU/ml, 20 min and 190 PFU per infected cell, respectively. It displayed a wide host range for MRSA bacteria by spot test (27 isolate from 30).Electron microscopy observation demonstrated that the phage belonged myoviridea family. Digestion profiles of Rnase A, Dnase I and XbaI restriction enzyme on 1% agarose gel Electrophoresis, show that the genome of isolated phage was a double-stranded DNA with a size of <∼43 kbp. Conclusion: The isolated phage was active against a wide range of MRSA strains recovered from burnt patients. Therefore it can be considered as a suitable candidate for use in prophylaxis and treatment of these clinical infections and for the preparation of anti-staphylococcal cocktails.
烧伤创面抗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)噬菌体的分离及体外评价
背景:耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)是人类健康的主要威胁。它被认为是一种多重耐药(MDR)病原体,能够引起多种疾病。MRSA也是烧伤感染中最重要的院内病原菌之一。作为一种抗MRSA感染的治疗策略,噬菌体治疗有可能成为一种替代疗法。因此,本研究的目的是从医院污水中分离并鉴定对烧伤创面感染MRSA菌株有效的溶解噬菌体。材料与方法:从住院烧伤患者中分离金黄色葡萄球菌菌株。经青霉素、甲氧西林、恶西林的Kirby-Bauer盘片扩散试验和mecA基因PCR检测,证实菌株为MRSA。从医院污水样品中分离噬菌体,采用双层琼脂(DLA)法进行滴度。采用斑点试验确定寄主范围。潜伏期和爆发大小由一步生长曲线估计。电镜观察噬菌体形态。采用rna酶A、dna酶I和6种限制性内切酶对分离噬菌体的核酸性质进行鉴定。结果:分离得到的噬菌体滴度为1×109 PFU/ml,潜伏期为20 min,爆发大小为190 PFU/ml。经现场检测,发现MRSA细菌的宿主范围广(30株分离27株)。电镜观察表明,该噬菌体属于肌病毒科。经1%琼脂糖凝胶电泳分析,分离噬菌体的rna酶A、DNA酶I和XbaI酶切图谱显示,噬菌体基因组为双链DNA,大小< ~ 43 kbp。结论:分离得到的噬菌体对烧伤患者体内广泛的MRSA菌株均有抑制作用。因此,它可以被认为是用于预防和治疗这些临床感染和制备抗葡萄球菌鸡尾酒的合适候选物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信