An Introduction to the Special Issue: Anti-Oppressive Group Work

IF 1.6 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Kristopher M. Goodrich, H. Peters, M. Luke
{"title":"An Introduction to the Special Issue: Anti-Oppressive Group Work","authors":"Kristopher M. Goodrich, H. Peters, M. Luke","doi":"10.1080/01933922.2023.2204052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The field of counselor education has long had a history of being a vanguard in commitments to multiculturalism and social justice, with scholars having named multiculturalism and social justice as the fourth and fifth forces in counseling. These movements have also found their way into group work, with scholars and leaders in the field recognizing the importance of both in the application of group work. These commitments have continually been institutionalized in professional practice statements made by organizations including the Association for Specialists in Group Work (ASGW; McCarthy et al., 2022; Singh et al., 2012). Through the COVID-19 pandemic, racial reckoning that resurfaced with the deaths of Breonna Taylor and George Floyd, among countless others (see Wu et al., 2023), and the increasing number of legislations targeting the Queer, Black, Indigenous, and People of Color communities, scholars began to increasingly question whether multiculturalism and social justice are sufficient. Accordingly, there has been an increased uptake in scholarly and clinical actions to address the longstanding and evolving oppressive forces, structures, and systems that influence the processes and practices of counseling, including group work. An such, the impetus for the current special issue emerged from the recent development of the ten Principles of Anti-Oppression, wherein Peters and Luke (2022) engaged in a poststructural, qualitative Critical Analytic Syntheses research to empirically identify and define principles of anti-oppression, which they define as a “framework and practice to guide the current and future critical and liberatory movement within counseling” (p. 4). Peters and Luke (2022) have contended that these Principles of Anti-Oppression were relevant to the field of counselor education with applications for teaching, supervision, and research. As they noted, these principles offer “viable points of entry to the processes and practices available to address the complex, intersectional, and multifaceted nature and forces, structures, and systems of oppression and discrimination (e.g., racism, genderism, ableism, heterosexism, classism, nationalism)” (Peters & Luke, 2023, p. 3). In discussions with these authors, we noted how logical and relevant it would be to apply the 10 principles to group work, recognizing that groups are a microcosm of society (Guth et al., 2019; Ward, 2011) and subject to similar patterns of intra-, inter, and systemic oppression experienced elsewhere. Relatedly, we recognized that group work can intentionally, or unintentionally, reproduce and reify larger societal, cultural, and social system dynamics and functioning (McCarthy et al., 2021; Peters & Luke, 2022). This, alongside the longstanding commitment of the ASGW, and by extension, its journal, The Journal for Specialists in Group Work (JSGW)’s commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion, the inclusion of a special issue centered around anti-oppression felt like a very strong fit that could fill an important gap in the literature. As such, we","PeriodicalId":45501,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Specialists in Group Work","volume":"18 1","pages":"81 - 83"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Specialists in Group Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01933922.2023.2204052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The field of counselor education has long had a history of being a vanguard in commitments to multiculturalism and social justice, with scholars having named multiculturalism and social justice as the fourth and fifth forces in counseling. These movements have also found their way into group work, with scholars and leaders in the field recognizing the importance of both in the application of group work. These commitments have continually been institutionalized in professional practice statements made by organizations including the Association for Specialists in Group Work (ASGW; McCarthy et al., 2022; Singh et al., 2012). Through the COVID-19 pandemic, racial reckoning that resurfaced with the deaths of Breonna Taylor and George Floyd, among countless others (see Wu et al., 2023), and the increasing number of legislations targeting the Queer, Black, Indigenous, and People of Color communities, scholars began to increasingly question whether multiculturalism and social justice are sufficient. Accordingly, there has been an increased uptake in scholarly and clinical actions to address the longstanding and evolving oppressive forces, structures, and systems that influence the processes and practices of counseling, including group work. An such, the impetus for the current special issue emerged from the recent development of the ten Principles of Anti-Oppression, wherein Peters and Luke (2022) engaged in a poststructural, qualitative Critical Analytic Syntheses research to empirically identify and define principles of anti-oppression, which they define as a “framework and practice to guide the current and future critical and liberatory movement within counseling” (p. 4). Peters and Luke (2022) have contended that these Principles of Anti-Oppression were relevant to the field of counselor education with applications for teaching, supervision, and research. As they noted, these principles offer “viable points of entry to the processes and practices available to address the complex, intersectional, and multifaceted nature and forces, structures, and systems of oppression and discrimination (e.g., racism, genderism, ableism, heterosexism, classism, nationalism)” (Peters & Luke, 2023, p. 3). In discussions with these authors, we noted how logical and relevant it would be to apply the 10 principles to group work, recognizing that groups are a microcosm of society (Guth et al., 2019; Ward, 2011) and subject to similar patterns of intra-, inter, and systemic oppression experienced elsewhere. Relatedly, we recognized that group work can intentionally, or unintentionally, reproduce and reify larger societal, cultural, and social system dynamics and functioning (McCarthy et al., 2021; Peters & Luke, 2022). This, alongside the longstanding commitment of the ASGW, and by extension, its journal, The Journal for Specialists in Group Work (JSGW)’s commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion, the inclusion of a special issue centered around anti-oppression felt like a very strong fit that could fill an important gap in the literature. As such, we
特刊简介:反压迫团体工作
长期以来,咨询教育领域一直是致力于多元文化主义和社会正义的先锋,学者们将多元文化主义和社会正义称为咨询的第四和第五股力量。这些运动也在小组工作中找到了自己的方式,该领域的学者和领导者认识到两者在小组工作应用中的重要性。这些承诺不断在各组织的专业实践声明中制度化,包括小组工作专家协会;McCarthy et al., 2022;Singh et al., 2012)。随着COVID-19大流行,随着Breonna Taylor和George Floyd等人的死亡而重新浮现的种族问题(见Wu et al., 2023),以及越来越多针对酷儿、黑人、土著和有色人种社区的立法,学者们开始越来越多地质疑多元文化主义和社会正义是否足够。因此,越来越多的学术和临床行动来解决影响咨询过程和实践(包括小组工作)的长期和不断发展的压迫力量、结构和系统。因此,当前特刊的动力来自反压迫十项原则的最新发展,其中彼得斯和卢克(2022)从事后结构定性批判分析综合研究,以经验识别和定义反压迫原则,他们将其定义为“指导咨询中当前和未来批判和解放运动的框架和实践”(第4页)。彼得斯和卢克(2022)认为,这些反压迫原则与咨询教育领域相关,适用于教学,监督和研究。正如他们所指出的,这些原则为“解决压迫和歧视(如种族主义、性别歧视、残疾歧视、异性恋歧视、阶级歧视、民族主义)的复杂、交叉和多方面的性质、力量、结构和系统的过程和实践提供了可行的切入点”(彼得斯和卢克,2023年,第3页)。在与这些作者的讨论中,我们注意到将这10条原则应用于小组工作是多么合乎逻辑和相关。认识到群体是社会的缩影(Guth等人,2019;Ward, 2011),并受到其他地方经历的类似的内部、内部和系统性压迫模式的影响。与此相关,我们认识到,小组工作可以有意或无意地再现和具体化更大的社会、文化和社会系统动态和功能(McCarthy等人,2021;Peters & Luke, 2022)。除了ASGW的长期承诺,以及它的期刊《小组工作专家期刊》(JSGW)对多样性、公平和包容性的承诺外,这一期以反压迫为中心的特刊的收录感觉非常契合,可以填补文献中的一个重要空白。因此,我们
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信