Molecular Characterization of KRAS Wild-type Tumors in Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

IF 0.4 2区 艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE
Philip A Philip, Ibrahim Azar, Joanne Xiu, Michael J Hall, Andrew Eugene Hendifar, Emil Lou, Jimmy J Hwang, Jun Gong, Rebecca Feldman, Michelle Ellis, Phil Stafford, David Spetzler, Moh'd M Khushman, Davendra Sohal, A Craig Lockhart, Benjamin A Weinberg, Wafik S El-Deiry, John Marshall, Anthony F Shields, W Michael Korn
{"title":"Molecular Characterization of KRAS Wild-type Tumors in Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.","authors":"Philip A Philip, Ibrahim Azar, Joanne Xiu, Michael J Hall, Andrew Eugene Hendifar, Emil Lou, Jimmy J Hwang, Jun Gong, Rebecca Feldman, Michelle Ellis, Phil Stafford, David Spetzler, Moh'd M Khushman, Davendra Sohal, A Craig Lockhart, Benjamin A Weinberg, Wafik S El-Deiry, John Marshall, Anthony F Shields, W Michael Korn","doi":"10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-3581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>KRAS mutation (MT) is a major oncogenic driver in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). A small subset of PDACs harbor KRAS wild-type (WT). We aim to characterize the molecular profiles of KRAS WT PDAC to uncover new pathogenic drivers and offer targeted treatments.</p><p><strong>Experimental design: </strong>Tumor tissue obtained from surgical or biopsy material was subjected to next-generation DNA/RNA sequencing, microsatellite instability (MSI) and mismatch repair status determination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2,483 patients (male 53.7%, median age 66 years) studied, 266 tumors (10.7%) were KRAS WT. The most frequently mutated gene in KRAS WT PDAC was TP53 (44.5%), followed by BRAF (13.0%). Multiple mutations within the DNA-damage repair (BRCA2, ATM, BAP1, RAD50, FANCE, PALB2), chromatin remodeling (ARID1A, PBRM1, ARID2, KMT2D, KMT2C, SMARCA4, SETD2), and cell-cycle control pathways (CDKN2A, CCND1, CCNE1) were detected frequently. There was no statistically significant difference in PD-L1 expression between KRAS WT (15.8%) and MT (17%) tumors. However, KRAS WT PDAC were more likely to be MSI-high (4.7% vs. 0.7%; P < 0.05), tumor mutational burden-high (4.5% vs. 1%; P < 0.05), and exhibit increased infiltration of CD8+ T cells, natural killer cells, and myeloid dendritic cells. KRAS WT PDACs exhibited gene fusions of BRAF (6.6%), FGFR2 (5.2%), ALK (2.6%), RET (1.3%), and NRG1 (1.3%), as well as amplification of FGF3 (3%), ERBB2 (2.2%), FGFR3 (1.8%), NTRK (1.8%), and MET (1.3%). Real-world evidence reveals a survival advantage of KRAS WT patients in overall cohorts as well as in patients treated with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel or 5-FU/oxaliplatin.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>KRAS WT PDAC represents 10.7% of PDAC and is enriched with targetable alterations, including immuno-oncologic markers. Identification of KRAS WT patients in clinical practice may expand therapeutic options in a clinically meaningful manner.</p>","PeriodicalId":51560,"journal":{"name":"DESIGN ISSUES","volume":"24 1","pages":"2704-2714"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541577/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DESIGN ISSUES","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-3581","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: KRAS mutation (MT) is a major oncogenic driver in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). A small subset of PDACs harbor KRAS wild-type (WT). We aim to characterize the molecular profiles of KRAS WT PDAC to uncover new pathogenic drivers and offer targeted treatments.

Experimental design: Tumor tissue obtained from surgical or biopsy material was subjected to next-generation DNA/RNA sequencing, microsatellite instability (MSI) and mismatch repair status determination.

Results: Of the 2,483 patients (male 53.7%, median age 66 years) studied, 266 tumors (10.7%) were KRAS WT. The most frequently mutated gene in KRAS WT PDAC was TP53 (44.5%), followed by BRAF (13.0%). Multiple mutations within the DNA-damage repair (BRCA2, ATM, BAP1, RAD50, FANCE, PALB2), chromatin remodeling (ARID1A, PBRM1, ARID2, KMT2D, KMT2C, SMARCA4, SETD2), and cell-cycle control pathways (CDKN2A, CCND1, CCNE1) were detected frequently. There was no statistically significant difference in PD-L1 expression between KRAS WT (15.8%) and MT (17%) tumors. However, KRAS WT PDAC were more likely to be MSI-high (4.7% vs. 0.7%; P < 0.05), tumor mutational burden-high (4.5% vs. 1%; P < 0.05), and exhibit increased infiltration of CD8+ T cells, natural killer cells, and myeloid dendritic cells. KRAS WT PDACs exhibited gene fusions of BRAF (6.6%), FGFR2 (5.2%), ALK (2.6%), RET (1.3%), and NRG1 (1.3%), as well as amplification of FGF3 (3%), ERBB2 (2.2%), FGFR3 (1.8%), NTRK (1.8%), and MET (1.3%). Real-world evidence reveals a survival advantage of KRAS WT patients in overall cohorts as well as in patients treated with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel or 5-FU/oxaliplatin.

Conclusions: KRAS WT PDAC represents 10.7% of PDAC and is enriched with targetable alterations, including immuno-oncologic markers. Identification of KRAS WT patients in clinical practice may expand therapeutic options in a clinically meaningful manner.

胰腺腺癌患者 KRAS 野生型肿瘤的分子特征。
目的:KRAS 突变(MT)是胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)的主要致癌驱动因素。一小部分 PDAC 存在 KRAS 野生型(WT)。我们旨在描述 KRAS WT PDAC 的分子特征,以发现新的致病驱动因素并提供靶向治疗:实验设计:对从手术或活检材料中获得的肿瘤组织进行新一代DNA/RNA测序、微卫星不稳定性(MSI)和错配修复状态测定:在研究的 2483 名患者(男性占 53.7%,中位年龄 66 岁)中,有 266 例肿瘤(10.7%)为 KRAS WT。KRAS WT PDAC中最常发生突变的基因是TP53(44.5%),其次是BRAF(13.0%)。在DNA损伤修复(BRCA2、ATM、BAP1、RAD50、FANCE、PALB2)、染色质重塑(ARID1A、PBRM1、ARID2、KMT2D、KMT2C、SMARCA4、SETD2)和细胞周期控制通路(CDKN2A、CCND1、CCNE1)中也经常检测到多种突变。KRAS WT肿瘤(15.8%)和MT肿瘤(17%)之间的PD-L1表达差异无统计学意义。然而,KRAS WT PDAC更有可能是MSI高(4.7% vs. 0.7%; P < 0.05)、肿瘤突变负荷高(4.5% vs. 1%; P < 0.05),并表现出CD8+ T细胞、自然杀伤细胞和髓树突状细胞浸润增加。KRAS WT PDACs表现出BRAF(6.6%)、FGFR2(5.2%)、ALK(2.6%)、RET(1.3%)和NRG1(1.3%)的基因融合,以及FGF3(3%)、ERBB2(2.2%)、FGFR3(1.8%)、NTRK(1.8%)和MET(1.3%)的扩增。现实世界的证据显示,KRAS WT 患者在总体队列以及接受吉西他滨/纳布紫杉醇或 5-FU/ 奥沙利铂治疗的患者中均具有生存优势:结论:KRAS WT PDAC占PDAC的10.7%,富含可靶向的改变,包括免疫肿瘤标志物。在临床实践中识别 KRAS WT 患者可能会扩大治疗选择的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
DESIGN ISSUES
DESIGN ISSUES ARCHITECTURE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The first American academic journal to examine design history, theory, and criticism, Design Issues provokes inquiry into the cultural and intellectual issues surrounding design. Regular features include theoretical and critical articles by professional and scholarly contributors, extensive book reviews, and illustrations. Special guest-edited issues concentrate on particular themes, such as artificial intelligence, product seminars, design in Asia, and design education. Scholars, students, and professionals in all the design fields are readers of each issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信