Administration Methods of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of Burn Wounds.

IF 1 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Astrid Bjørke Jenssen, Samih Mohamed-Ahmed, Esko Kankuri, Ragnvald Ljones Brekke, Anne Berit Guttormsen, Bjørn Tore Gjertsen, Kamal Mustafa, Stian Kreken Almeland
{"title":"Administration Methods of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of Burn Wounds.","authors":"Astrid Bjørke Jenssen, Samih Mohamed-Ahmed, Esko Kankuri, Ragnvald Ljones Brekke, Anne Berit Guttormsen, Bjørn Tore Gjertsen, Kamal Mustafa, Stian Kreken Almeland","doi":"10.3390/ebj3040043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cellular therapies for burn wound healing, including the administration of mesenchymal stem or stromal cells (MSCs), have shown promising results. This review aims to provide an overview of the current administration methods in preclinical and clinical studies of bone-marrow-, adipose-tissue-, and umbilical-cord-derived MSCs for treating burn wounds. Relevant studies were identified through a literature search in PubMed and Embase and subjected to inclusion and exclusion criteria for eligibility. Additional relevant studies were identified through a manual search of reference lists. A total of sixty-nine studies were included in this review. Of the included studies, only five had clinical data from patients, one was a prospective case-control, three were case reports, and one was a case series. Administration methods used were local injection (41% in preclinical and 40% in clinical studies), cell-seeded scaffolds (35% and 20%), topical application (17% and 60%), and systemic injection (1% and 0%). There was great heterogeneity between the studies regarding experimental models, administration methods, and cell dosages. Local injection was the most common administration method in animal studies, while topical application was used in most clinical reports. The best delivery method of MSCs in burn wounds is yet to be identified. Although the potential of MSC treatment for burn wounds is promising, future research should focus on examining the effect and scalability of such therapy in clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":72961,"journal":{"name":"European burn journal","volume":"23 1","pages":"493-516"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571831/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European burn journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ebj3040043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cellular therapies for burn wound healing, including the administration of mesenchymal stem or stromal cells (MSCs), have shown promising results. This review aims to provide an overview of the current administration methods in preclinical and clinical studies of bone-marrow-, adipose-tissue-, and umbilical-cord-derived MSCs for treating burn wounds. Relevant studies were identified through a literature search in PubMed and Embase and subjected to inclusion and exclusion criteria for eligibility. Additional relevant studies were identified through a manual search of reference lists. A total of sixty-nine studies were included in this review. Of the included studies, only five had clinical data from patients, one was a prospective case-control, three were case reports, and one was a case series. Administration methods used were local injection (41% in preclinical and 40% in clinical studies), cell-seeded scaffolds (35% and 20%), topical application (17% and 60%), and systemic injection (1% and 0%). There was great heterogeneity between the studies regarding experimental models, administration methods, and cell dosages. Local injection was the most common administration method in animal studies, while topical application was used in most clinical reports. The best delivery method of MSCs in burn wounds is yet to be identified. Although the potential of MSC treatment for burn wounds is promising, future research should focus on examining the effect and scalability of such therapy in clinical trials.

间充质干细胞治疗烧伤伤口的管理方法。
用于烧伤创面愈合的细胞疗法,包括间充质干细胞或基质细胞(MSCs)的施用,已显示出良好的效果。本综述旨在概述目前临床前和临床研究中用于治疗烧伤创面的骨髓、脂肪组织和脐带间充质干细胞的给药方法。通过在 PubMed 和 Embase 中进行文献检索,确定了相关研究,并按照纳入和排除标准进行了资格审查。此外,还通过手动搜索参考文献列表确定了其他相关研究。本综述共纳入了 69 项研究。在纳入的研究中,只有五项研究有患者的临床数据,一项是前瞻性病例对照,三项是病例报告,一项是病例系列。使用的给药方法有局部注射(临床前研究中占 41%,临床研究中占 40%)、细胞播种支架(35% 和 20%)、局部应用(17% 和 60%)以及全身注射(1% 和 0%)。各研究在实验模型、给药方法和细胞剂量方面存在很大差异。在动物实验中,局部注射是最常见的给药方法,而大多数临床报告则采用局部应用。间充质干细胞在烧伤创面中的最佳给药方法仍有待确定。虽然间充质干细胞治疗烧伤创面的潜力巨大,但未来的研究应侧重于在临床试验中检验这种疗法的效果和可扩展性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信