Benjamin D Gross, Christopher A White, Kevin C Wang, Akshar V Patel, Bradford O Parsons, Paul J Cagle
{"title":"The 50 most-cited articles in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.","authors":"Benjamin D Gross, Christopher A White, Kevin C Wang, Akshar V Patel, Bradford O Parsons, Paul J Cagle","doi":"10.1177/17585732231155123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Citation analyses have been used to understand the impact that a group of publications has on its field. As the techniques and indications of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) continue to expand, it is important to identify articles that can orient readers to the history, evolution, and current status of the body of RTSA literature. The purpose of this study was to identify and analyze the 50 most-cited articles related to RTSA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Various Boolean queries were searched on the Clarivate Analytics Web of Science. Information collected included author name, publication year, country of origin, journal name, article type, total number of citations, and level of evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Top 50 most-cited articles amassed a total of 10,521 citations. The most-cited article was cited a total of 766 times. The most common study designs were case series (28) and cohort studies (9). Authors from the United States (24) contributed the most to included papers, followed by France (19) and Switzerland (8).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The most-cited articles on RTSA are expert opinions, case studies, and cohort studies published by American authors. As RTSA continues to grow over the next decade, studies with higher levels-of-evidence may overtake articles included in this analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":8163,"journal":{"name":"Arabica","volume":"5 1","pages":"82-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10649503/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arabica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732231155123","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Citation analyses have been used to understand the impact that a group of publications has on its field. As the techniques and indications of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) continue to expand, it is important to identify articles that can orient readers to the history, evolution, and current status of the body of RTSA literature. The purpose of this study was to identify and analyze the 50 most-cited articles related to RTSA.
Methods: Various Boolean queries were searched on the Clarivate Analytics Web of Science. Information collected included author name, publication year, country of origin, journal name, article type, total number of citations, and level of evidence.
Results: Top 50 most-cited articles amassed a total of 10,521 citations. The most-cited article was cited a total of 766 times. The most common study designs were case series (28) and cohort studies (9). Authors from the United States (24) contributed the most to included papers, followed by France (19) and Switzerland (8).
Discussion: The most-cited articles on RTSA are expert opinions, case studies, and cohort studies published by American authors. As RTSA continues to grow over the next decade, studies with higher levels-of-evidence may overtake articles included in this analysis.
背景:引文分析已被用于了解一组出版物在其领域的影响。随着逆行全肩关节置换术(RTSA)的技术和适应症不断扩大,寻找能够引导读者了解RTSA文献的历史、演变和现状的文章是很重要的。本研究的目的是识别和分析50篇与RTSA相关的被引用次数最多的文章。方法:在Clarivate Analytics Web of Science上搜索各种布尔查询。收集的信息包括作者姓名、出版年份、原产国、期刊名称、文章类型、总引用次数和证据水平。结果:排名前50位的文章被引用的次数达到了10521次。被引次数最多的文章被引用了766次。最常见的研究设计是病例系列(28)和队列研究(9)。来自美国(24)的作者对纳入的论文贡献最多,其次是法国(19)和瑞士(8)。讨论:RTSA上被引用最多的文章是美国作者发表的专家意见、案例研究和队列研究。随着RTSA在未来十年的持续发展,具有更高证据水平的研究可能会超过本分析中包含的文章。