Monstrosity in Medical Science: Race-Making and Teratology in the Nineteenth-Century United States

IF 1 2区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Isis Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1086/726315
M. Rich
{"title":"Monstrosity in Medical Science: Race-Making and Teratology in the Nineteenth-Century United States","authors":"M. Rich","doi":"10.1086/726315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay analyzes the medical study of “monstrous birth” as a site of race-making in the nineteenth-century United States. It argues that the medical theorization of monstrosity was structured by multiple logics of race, which both shaped and emerged from medical authorities’ efforts to classify and interpret anomalous newborn bodies. Materialized at the intersection of these logics, the biological monster theorized a racial order that was hierarchical, temporalized, and vulnerable to the dangers of women’s reproduction. In this context, monstrosity became a way to advance claims about the nature of racial hierarchy, articulate the threat and mechanism of racial degeneration, and negotiate the contradictions of shifting racial imaginaries across the nineteenth century. Exploring the medical engagement with monstrosity thus sheds light on entanglements of medical science and race-making in U.S. history, showing how practitioners produced and elaborated unstable concepts of scientific race, and revealing how race was linked to reproduction in the emergence of modern biomedical discourse.","PeriodicalId":14667,"journal":{"name":"Isis","volume":"1 1","pages":"513 - 536"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Isis","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/726315","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay analyzes the medical study of “monstrous birth” as a site of race-making in the nineteenth-century United States. It argues that the medical theorization of monstrosity was structured by multiple logics of race, which both shaped and emerged from medical authorities’ efforts to classify and interpret anomalous newborn bodies. Materialized at the intersection of these logics, the biological monster theorized a racial order that was hierarchical, temporalized, and vulnerable to the dangers of women’s reproduction. In this context, monstrosity became a way to advance claims about the nature of racial hierarchy, articulate the threat and mechanism of racial degeneration, and negotiate the contradictions of shifting racial imaginaries across the nineteenth century. Exploring the medical engagement with monstrosity thus sheds light on entanglements of medical science and race-making in U.S. history, showing how practitioners produced and elaborated unstable concepts of scientific race, and revealing how race was linked to reproduction in the emergence of modern biomedical discourse.
医学科学中的怪物:19世纪美国的种族制造和畸形学
本文分析了19世纪美国“畸形出生”作为种族制造场所的医学研究。它认为,怪物的医学理论是由多种种族逻辑构成的,这些逻辑既形成了医学当局对异常新生儿身体的分类和解释的努力,也产生了这些逻辑。在这些逻辑的交汇处物质化,生物怪物理论化了一种种族秩序,这种秩序是有等级的、暂时的,容易受到女性生育危险的影响。在这种背景下,怪物论成为了一种推进关于种族等级本质的主张,阐明种族退化的威胁和机制,以及在整个19世纪不断变化的种族想象中协调矛盾的方式。因此,探索医学与怪物的接触,揭示了美国历史上医学科学与种族形成的纠缠,展示了从业者如何产生和阐述不稳定的科学种族概念,并揭示了种族如何在现代生物医学话语的出现中与生殖联系在一起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Isis
Isis 管理科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
150
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1912, Isis has featured scholarly articles, research notes, and commentary on the history of science, medicine, and technology and their cultural influences. Review essays and book reviews on new contributions to the discipline are also included. An official publication of the History of Science Society, Isis is the oldest English-language journal in the field. The Press, along with the journal’s editorial office in Starkville, MS, would like to acknowledge the following supporters: Mississippi State University, its College of Arts and Sciences and History Department, and the Consortium for the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信