Inter-Religious Relations and Methodologi Issues

A. Syukur
{"title":"Inter-Religious Relations and Methodologi Issues","authors":"A. Syukur","doi":"10.59291/jnd.v1i1.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Every religion teaches its followers to live peacefully and harmoniously with others, both the same and different religion followers. However, the fact shows that relations among religious people are often to be problematical. This is not only because of differences between religions in doctrines and practices but also because of different interpretations (sects) and organizations. This religious conflict obviously will harm the religious people themselves. As humanity, religious people want to live together harmoniously with others, both fellow religion, and different religions, because they live on the same earth. This article will discuss how are the inter-religious relationships related to methodological problems in the field of religious studies. Methodologically, Comparative Religion that developed in the early time it studied religions from a theological perspective that is looking at the other religions from their own. So, what happened was the pokrol bambu attitude, raising his religion and demeaning on another. This method is not good for students who study religions, particularly for Indonesians who are multi-religious, because it will only look at his/her religion as superior whereas another as inferior. Wilfred Cantwell Smith, on the other hand, offers a method that is personalizing religion as a way of studying religions. Religion should not be seen only as a set of fixed doctrines and ready-made. The problem of religion is essentially a human problem in which the adherents of each religion always understand, experience and realize their religious beliefs and practices in daily life. Therefore, religion is always new every day. This method or approach requires students to study other religions through the perspective of the people who embraced it, so that, biased interpretation can be avoided. This method requires students to come and have a dialogue with the religious followers concerned.","PeriodicalId":31097,"journal":{"name":"Walisongo Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Walisongo Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59291/jnd.v1i1.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Every religion teaches its followers to live peacefully and harmoniously with others, both the same and different religion followers. However, the fact shows that relations among religious people are often to be problematical. This is not only because of differences between religions in doctrines and practices but also because of different interpretations (sects) and organizations. This religious conflict obviously will harm the religious people themselves. As humanity, religious people want to live together harmoniously with others, both fellow religion, and different religions, because they live on the same earth. This article will discuss how are the inter-religious relationships related to methodological problems in the field of religious studies. Methodologically, Comparative Religion that developed in the early time it studied religions from a theological perspective that is looking at the other religions from their own. So, what happened was the pokrol bambu attitude, raising his religion and demeaning on another. This method is not good for students who study religions, particularly for Indonesians who are multi-religious, because it will only look at his/her religion as superior whereas another as inferior. Wilfred Cantwell Smith, on the other hand, offers a method that is personalizing religion as a way of studying religions. Religion should not be seen only as a set of fixed doctrines and ready-made. The problem of religion is essentially a human problem in which the adherents of each religion always understand, experience and realize their religious beliefs and practices in daily life. Therefore, religion is always new every day. This method or approach requires students to study other religions through the perspective of the people who embraced it, so that, biased interpretation can be avoided. This method requires students to come and have a dialogue with the religious followers concerned.
宗教间关系和方法问题
每一种宗教都教导其信徒与他人和平相处,无论是同一宗教的信徒还是不同宗教的信徒。然而,事实表明,宗教人士之间的关系往往是有问题的。这不仅是因为宗教之间在教义和实践上的差异,而且还因为不同的解释(教派)和组织。这种宗教冲突显然会伤害信教的人自己。作为人类,信教的人希望与其他宗教和睦相处,无论是同宗教还是不同宗教,因为他们生活在同一个地球上。本文将讨论宗教间关系如何与宗教研究领域的方法论问题相关。在方法论上,早期发展起来的比较宗教是从神学的角度来研究宗教的,从其他宗教的角度来看待它们。所以,发生了什么是pokrol bambu的态度,提高他的宗教和贬低别人。这种方法对学习宗教的学生来说并不好,尤其是对多宗教的印尼人来说,因为它只会把他/她的宗教视为优越,而另一个宗教则是劣等的。另一方面,威尔弗雷德·坎特威尔·史密斯提供了一种方法,将宗教个性化,作为研究宗教的一种方式。宗教不应只被视为一套固定的教义和现成的东西。宗教问题本质上是一个人的问题,每个宗教的信徒在日常生活中总是理解、体验和实现他们的宗教信仰和实践。因此,宗教每天都是新的。这种方法或途径要求学生从信奉它的人的角度来研究其他宗教,这样就可以避免有偏见的解释。这种方法要求学生来与有关的宗教信徒进行对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书