Comparing bird sightings between grassland and marsh habitats at a rehabilitated wetland in Gauteng Province, South Africa

J. Botha, N. S. Haussmann
{"title":"Comparing bird sightings between grassland and marsh habitats at a rehabilitated wetland in Gauteng Province, South Africa","authors":"J. Botha, N. S. Haussmann","doi":"10.13057/biodiv/d240652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Botha J, Haussmann NS. 2023. Comparing bird sightings between grassland and marsh habitats at a rehabilitated wetland in Gauteng Province, South Africa. Biodiversitas 24: 3536-3542. Wetlands, including rehabilitated wetlands, form important feeding and nesting sites for a large range of bird species. The restoration of degraded wetlands is therefore important from a bird biodiversity perspective and bird surveys are needed in such systems. However, bird counts typically differ both spatially (e.g., between different habitats within the wetland) and temporally (e.g., between different seasons or times of the day). This study compared bird sightings at a rehabilitated wetland in the Gauteng Province of South Africa between marsh and grassland sections of the wetland and between morning and afternoon sessions. A total of 47 bird species were sighted at the wetland, including a number of species that have been listed as declining. Whereas more species were sighted in the marsh habitats of the wetland than the grassland habitats, differences in the number of sightings between habitats depended on the time of day. Thus, although there were no differences in the number of sightings between morning and afternoon sessions at the marshes, the number of sightings was higher in the afternoons than in the mornings at the grasslands. We therefore, first caution against comparing bird counts, in general, between studies conducted at different times of the day. More importantly, however, our results highlight the importance of not only conserving natural, pristine wetlands but also rehabilitated wetlands to create habitats for declining bird populations in transformed environments such as urban settings.","PeriodicalId":8801,"journal":{"name":"Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d240652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Botha J, Haussmann NS. 2023. Comparing bird sightings between grassland and marsh habitats at a rehabilitated wetland in Gauteng Province, South Africa. Biodiversitas 24: 3536-3542. Wetlands, including rehabilitated wetlands, form important feeding and nesting sites for a large range of bird species. The restoration of degraded wetlands is therefore important from a bird biodiversity perspective and bird surveys are needed in such systems. However, bird counts typically differ both spatially (e.g., between different habitats within the wetland) and temporally (e.g., between different seasons or times of the day). This study compared bird sightings at a rehabilitated wetland in the Gauteng Province of South Africa between marsh and grassland sections of the wetland and between morning and afternoon sessions. A total of 47 bird species were sighted at the wetland, including a number of species that have been listed as declining. Whereas more species were sighted in the marsh habitats of the wetland than the grassland habitats, differences in the number of sightings between habitats depended on the time of day. Thus, although there were no differences in the number of sightings between morning and afternoon sessions at the marshes, the number of sightings was higher in the afternoons than in the mornings at the grasslands. We therefore, first caution against comparing bird counts, in general, between studies conducted at different times of the day. More importantly, however, our results highlight the importance of not only conserving natural, pristine wetlands but also rehabilitated wetlands to create habitats for declining bird populations in transformed environments such as urban settings.
在南非豪登省一个恢复后的湿地,比较草地和沼泽栖息地之间的鸟类目击
摘要Botha J, Haussmann NS。2023. 在南非豪登省一个恢复后的湿地,比较草地和沼泽栖息地之间的鸟类目击。生物多样性24:3536-3542。湿地,包括修复后的湿地,是多种鸟类重要的觅食和筑巢地。因此,从鸟类生物多样性的角度来看,退化湿地的恢复是重要的,需要在这些系统中进行鸟类调查。然而,鸟类数量通常在空间上(例如,湿地内不同栖息地之间)和时间上(例如,不同季节或一天中的不同时间之间)存在差异。这项研究比较了南非豪登省一个恢复后的湿地在湿地的沼泽区和草地区以及上午和下午的鸟类目击情况。在湿地共发现47种鸟类,包括一些已被列为濒危的物种。在湿地的沼泽生境中发现的物种多于在草地生境中发现的物种,不同生境中发现的物种数量的差异取决于一天中的不同时间。因此,尽管上午和下午在沼泽上的目击次数没有差异,但下午的目击次数比上午在草原上的目击次数要高。因此,我们首先要注意,一般来说,在一天中不同时间进行的研究中,不要比较鸟类数量。然而,更重要的是,我们的研究结果强调了不仅要保护自然的原始湿地,而且要恢复湿地,为城市环境等转型环境中不断减少的鸟类创造栖息地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信