When Will MEMS Switches be Ready for Commercial Products

R. Coutu
{"title":"When Will MEMS Switches be Ready for Commercial Products","authors":"R. Coutu","doi":"10.15406/ijbsbe.2017.03.00074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"of applications due to their broadband operation (i.e. DC-40GHz). The RF MEMS switch, however, has not yet made it to “prime time” due to its perceived limitations in both performance (i.e. stable electrical contact resistance) and reliability (i.e. lifetime). Let me explain the perceived limitations and how I see a way forward to commercialization. First, the original specifications for RF MEMS switches were < 1dB insertion loss and >1×1012 switching cycles. I believe these specifications were originally based on using RF MEMS switches to replace transistor switches onboard satellites. Unfortunately, this original specification has become the “gold standard” for all applications. Next, the majority of RF MEMS switch researchers have primarily focused on either searching for the “holy grail” electrical contact material or on designing innovative, high contact force, mechanical switch designs (i.e. actuators). Both of these approaches are attempts to “engineer away” poor performance and reliability with either a special contact material or a better actuator. Unfortunately, most of these efforts have done little to actually improve micro-switch performance and/or reliability. As of today, I am aware of only one viable company that is pursuing the manufacture of microswitches and several companies that have gone out of business.3 There are, however, a few companies that have in-house research projects to develop micro-switches for their own products.3 I believe the way forward to commercialization MEMS switches is to first study the fundamentals of micro-contact physics and thin film metallurgy in a meaningful way. What does this mean? First, as a community MEMS switch researchers need to focus on the root causes of device failure not just avoiding failures. For example, when studying the electrical contact it should be decoupled from the mechanical switch design so that the micro-contact physics can be studied directly. The results of these fundamental studies could then be used to design micro-contacts suitable for micro-switches.","PeriodicalId":15247,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biosensors and Bioelectronics","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biosensors and Bioelectronics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/ijbsbe.2017.03.00074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

of applications due to their broadband operation (i.e. DC-40GHz). The RF MEMS switch, however, has not yet made it to “prime time” due to its perceived limitations in both performance (i.e. stable electrical contact resistance) and reliability (i.e. lifetime). Let me explain the perceived limitations and how I see a way forward to commercialization. First, the original specifications for RF MEMS switches were < 1dB insertion loss and >1×1012 switching cycles. I believe these specifications were originally based on using RF MEMS switches to replace transistor switches onboard satellites. Unfortunately, this original specification has become the “gold standard” for all applications. Next, the majority of RF MEMS switch researchers have primarily focused on either searching for the “holy grail” electrical contact material or on designing innovative, high contact force, mechanical switch designs (i.e. actuators). Both of these approaches are attempts to “engineer away” poor performance and reliability with either a special contact material or a better actuator. Unfortunately, most of these efforts have done little to actually improve micro-switch performance and/or reliability. As of today, I am aware of only one viable company that is pursuing the manufacture of microswitches and several companies that have gone out of business.3 There are, however, a few companies that have in-house research projects to develop micro-switches for their own products.3 I believe the way forward to commercialization MEMS switches is to first study the fundamentals of micro-contact physics and thin film metallurgy in a meaningful way. What does this mean? First, as a community MEMS switch researchers need to focus on the root causes of device failure not just avoiding failures. For example, when studying the electrical contact it should be decoupled from the mechanical switch design so that the micro-contact physics can be studied directly. The results of these fundamental studies could then be used to design micro-contacts suitable for micro-switches.
MEMS开关何时可用于商业产品
由于其宽带操作(即DC-40GHz)的应用。然而,由于其在性能(即稳定的电接触电阻)和可靠性(即寿命)方面的局限性,RF MEMS开关尚未达到“黄金时间”。让我来解释一下它的局限性,以及我对商业化的看法。首先,射频MEMS开关的原始规格是< 1dB插入损耗和>1×1012开关周期。我相信这些规格最初是基于使用射频MEMS开关来取代卫星上的晶体管开关。不幸的是,这个原始规范已经成为所有应用程序的“黄金标准”。接下来,大多数RF MEMS开关研究人员主要专注于寻找“圣杯”电接触材料或设计创新的高接触力机械开关设计(即执行器)。这两种方法都试图通过特殊的触点材料或更好的致动器来“工程化”糟糕的性能和可靠性。不幸的是,大多数这些努力并没有真正提高微动开关的性能和/或可靠性。截至今天,我知道只有一家可行的公司正在追求微开关的制造,还有几家公司已经倒闭然而,也有少数公司有内部研究项目,为自己的产品开发微开关我相信MEMS开关商业化的道路是首先以有意义的方式研究微接触物理和薄膜冶金的基础。这是什么意思?首先,作为一个社区MEMS开关研究人员需要关注器件故障的根本原因,而不仅仅是避免故障。例如,在研究电接触时,应将其与机械开关设计解耦,以便直接研究微接触物理。这些基础研究的结果可用于设计适合微开关的微触点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信