Academic Reputation, or Voluntary Epistemic Servitude

IF 1.5 Q3 BUSINESS

CORPORATE REPUTATION REVIEW Pub Date : 2019-11-12 DOI:10.23943/princeton/9780691196329.003.0009

G. Origgi

引用次数: 1

Abstract

This chapter presents case studies of the way reputations are built at the university. If there is an institution that feeds on reputation, it is the academy. Prestige, notoriety, standing, and reputation reign supreme within its halls. Professors and scholars are not only more motivated by symbolic rewards than by economic interest. They also spend a great deal of time designing institutions whose primary purpose is the creation, maintenance, and evaluation of each other's reputation and eminence. Such rankings are sometimes even treated as if they were the most dependable hallmarks of the truth itself. The chapter shows how the very idea of an academic reputation changed radically after new systems for calibrating reputations came into their own.

查看原文本刊更多论文

学术声誉，或自愿的认知奴役

本章介绍了大学声誉建立方式的案例研究。如果说有什么机构是靠声誉为生的，那就是学院。声望、恶名、地位和声誉在它的殿堂中至高无上。与经济利益相比，教授和学者不仅更受象征性奖励的激励。他们还花费大量时间设计制度，其主要目的是创造、维护和评价彼此的声誉和卓越。这种排名有时甚至被认为是事实本身最可靠的标志。本章展示了在新的声誉校准系统出现后，学术声誉的概念如何发生了根本性的变化。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

CORPORATE REPUTATION REVIEW

CiteScore

3.80

自引率

5.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Corporate Reputation Review is the leading international journal for all scholars and academics concerned with managing and measuring corporate reputation.The Journal is reviewed by a distinguished editorial board, under the guidance of Guido Berens (Erasmus University, The Netherlands). Corporate Reputation Review provides a forum for rigorous, practically relevant academic research into reputations and reputation management, as well as related concepts such as identity and corporate communication.