K. Reddy, N AbhinandanPatelK, G. Girish, S RajendraK, R SnehaT, R Akarsh
{"title":"Bite force measurement in maxillofacial trauma – A clinical prospective study","authors":"K. Reddy, N AbhinandanPatelK, G. Girish, S RajendraK, R SnehaT, R Akarsh","doi":"10.18231/J.JOOO.2021.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Maxillofacial fractures not only cause a change in the skeletal architecture (anatomical) but also lead to changes in the masticatory apparatus (functional). Masticatory function refers to the ability to chew without any interference or pain. The major determinants of this is the range of mandibular motion, maximum occlusal forces, and the activity of the masticatory muscles. This function is affected in maxillofacial trauma and also pathological injuries to the jaws. Bite force measurements are an excellent criteria for the assessment of masticatory efficiency. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of maxillofacial fractures on the bite forces of patients treated for such fractures. Materials and Methods: 65 patients divided into 7 groups based on the kind of maxillofacial fracture. All the cases underwent ORIF. Bite force were measured on the immediate post-operative period, 1st , 4th and 12th post-operative week. The bite force instrument (transducer) was positioned between the antagonizing cusps in the region of Left First Molar and Right First Molar. Results: At the end of the 3rd post-operative week, all the groups showed a statistically significant increase in the bite force measurement as compared to the immediate post-operative bite force recording. Conclusion: Thus we conclude by saying that our study provides a basis for similar studies with a longer follow up period and larger sample size in order to assess the different kinds of maxillofacial trauma and its effect on bite force. © This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.","PeriodicalId":16606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":"42-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/J.JOOO.2021.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
颌面外伤的咬合力测量-一项临床前瞻性研究
颌面骨折不仅引起骨骼结构(解剖)的改变,而且导致咀嚼器官(功能)的改变。咀嚼功能是指没有任何干扰或疼痛的咀嚼能力。主要的决定因素是下颌运动的范围,最大咬合力和咀嚼肌的活动。这一功能在颌面部外伤和颌骨病理性损伤中受到影响。咬合力测量是评估咀嚼效率的一个很好的标准。本研究的目的是评估颌面部骨折对此类骨折患者咬合力的影响。材料与方法:65例患者按颌面部骨折类型分为7组。所有病例均行ORIF。分别于术后即刻、术后第1周、第4周、第12周测定咬合力。咬合力仪(换能器)放置在左第一磨牙和右第一磨牙区域的拮抗尖牙之间。结果:术后第3周结束时,各组患者的咬合力测量值均较术后即刻咬合力记录值有统计学意义的提高。结论:本研究为今后更长时间、更大样本量的类似研究提供了依据,以评估不同颌面外伤类型及其对咬合力的影响。©这是一篇根据知识共享署名许可(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)发布的开放获取文章,该许可允许在任何媒体上不受限制地使用、分发和复制,前提是要注明原作者和来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。