Functional foods classification system: exemplifying through analysis of bioactive compounds

D. Martirosyan, Morgan Ekblad
{"title":"Functional foods classification system: exemplifying through analysis of bioactive compounds","authors":"D. Martirosyan, Morgan Ekblad","doi":"10.31989/ffs.v2i4.919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The classification of functional foods based on their usefulness in the management of diseases and bodily conditions is currently absent from modern academia. Benefits from a system classifying functional foods by the amount of scholarly research performed on functional foods could be useful in managing diseases, informing the public, and legitimizing functional food as a consistent method for well-being promotion. The purpose of this study is to exemplify a previously proposed 16-step system by which functional foods may be ranked according to which studies have been conducted, highlighting their abilities. Listings would include common chronic diseases affecting first-world individuals; diabetes, obesity, cancer, heart disease, and Alzheimer’s/dementia. The proposed system would implement an alphanumeric code of ‘A’, ‘B’, or ‘C’, depending on if foods have undergone epidemiological studies, clinical trials, and aftermarket research, only epidemiological and clinical studies, or have only been certified as a functional food. Current statistics discerning the prevalence of the listed chronic disease are utilized to contextualize the uniqueness of each bioactive compound and demonstrate the variance of effect by functional food products. Additionally, individual bioactive compounds are analyzed, denoting their efficacy in observable trials to better contextualize food function. From the proposed system, many prospective functional food products would not be eligible for classification by standards previously proposed in the 16-step plan. Taking into consideration current literature, the lack of standardized testing and optimal dosage leaves much to be desired in classifying functional food products. This study aims to exemplify a viable system by which functional foods can currently be analyzed and ranked based on empirical research studies. With suitable support from these studies, bioactive compounds and their subsequent food vehicles will be justly classified within an easy-to-recognize system. As the field of functional food grows, more factors to the analytical process may need to be applied, especially should the definition of functional foods categorize products in a way that aids the FDA’s system.Keywords: Functional Food, Functional Food Classification, Bioactive Compounds, Classification of Bioactive Compounds, Aftermarket research","PeriodicalId":12570,"journal":{"name":"Functional Food Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Functional Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31989/ffs.v2i4.919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The classification of functional foods based on their usefulness in the management of diseases and bodily conditions is currently absent from modern academia. Benefits from a system classifying functional foods by the amount of scholarly research performed on functional foods could be useful in managing diseases, informing the public, and legitimizing functional food as a consistent method for well-being promotion. The purpose of this study is to exemplify a previously proposed 16-step system by which functional foods may be ranked according to which studies have been conducted, highlighting their abilities. Listings would include common chronic diseases affecting first-world individuals; diabetes, obesity, cancer, heart disease, and Alzheimer’s/dementia. The proposed system would implement an alphanumeric code of ‘A’, ‘B’, or ‘C’, depending on if foods have undergone epidemiological studies, clinical trials, and aftermarket research, only epidemiological and clinical studies, or have only been certified as a functional food. Current statistics discerning the prevalence of the listed chronic disease are utilized to contextualize the uniqueness of each bioactive compound and demonstrate the variance of effect by functional food products. Additionally, individual bioactive compounds are analyzed, denoting their efficacy in observable trials to better contextualize food function. From the proposed system, many prospective functional food products would not be eligible for classification by standards previously proposed in the 16-step plan. Taking into consideration current literature, the lack of standardized testing and optimal dosage leaves much to be desired in classifying functional food products. This study aims to exemplify a viable system by which functional foods can currently be analyzed and ranked based on empirical research studies. With suitable support from these studies, bioactive compounds and their subsequent food vehicles will be justly classified within an easy-to-recognize system. As the field of functional food grows, more factors to the analytical process may need to be applied, especially should the definition of functional foods categorize products in a way that aids the FDA’s system.Keywords: Functional Food, Functional Food Classification, Bioactive Compounds, Classification of Bioactive Compounds, Aftermarket research
功能食品分类体系:以生物活性成分分析为例
现代学术界目前缺乏基于对疾病和身体状况管理有用性的功能性食品分类。根据功能性食品的学术研究数量对功能性食品进行分类的系统的好处可能有助于管理疾病,告知公众,并将功能性食品作为一种促进健康的一致方法合法化。本研究的目的是举例说明先前提出的16步系统,根据已进行的研究对功能食品进行排名,突出其功能。清单将包括影响第一世界个人的常见慢性疾病;糖尿病、肥胖、癌症、心脏病和阿尔茨海默病/痴呆症。拟议的系统将实施“A”、“B”或“C”的字母数字代码,具体取决于食品是否经过流行病学研究、临床试验和售后研究,仅进行流行病学和临床研究,或仅被认证为功能性食品。目前的统计数据识别所列慢性疾病的流行,利用背景下的独特性,每一个生物活性化合物,并证明不同的功能食品的影响。此外,还分析了单个生物活性化合物,在可观察的试验中表明其功效,以更好地了解食品功能。从拟议的系统来看,许多潜在的功能食品将没有资格按照先前在16步计划中提出的标准进行分类。考虑到目前的文献,缺乏标准化的测试和最佳剂量,在功能性食品的分类中有很多需要改进的地方。本研究旨在举例说明一个可行的系统,通过该系统,目前可以根据实证研究对功能食品进行分析和排名。在这些研究的适当支持下,生物活性化合物及其后续食品载体将被公正地分类在一个易于识别的系统中。随着功能食品领域的发展,分析过程中可能需要应用更多因素,特别是功能食品的定义是否应该以一种有助于FDA系统的方式对产品进行分类。关键词:功能食品,功能食品分类,生物活性化合物,生物活性化合物分类,售后市场研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信