Clay Miniature Altars from Olbia

Q4 Arts and Humanities
T. Shevchenko
{"title":"Clay Miniature Altars from Olbia","authors":"T. Shevchenko","doi":"10.15407/arheologia2022.02.105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Аrulae bearing four standard relief scenes on their sides are discussed in the paper and mapped on the area of their spread in Pontic region. Their origin is being discussed for almost a century. According to number of finds, Southern Italy was believed to be the place of their production, while according to the analogies on mouldmade pottery it was Athens. However, a find of such item made of imported clay in Athens, as well as quantitative prevailing of them in the Black Sea region allow presuming the additional centres of their production. Most of published here terracottas from Olbia were found in a botros at the Central temenos where a coroplast’s workshop had functioned. No mould for arulae production was discovered there, but their significant number, the variations in décor and size of the upper part, finds of smaller size arulae of the next generation of mould, as well as manufactural techniques peculiar for Olbian coroplastics of the 2nd century BC allow presuming the local production of these items. It is revealed that the height of the area above the denticule between the palmettes depended on processing by hand and varied significantly. It means that such an indicator as size of the altars should not be considered as decisive in determining of their origin. The publication of Olbian finds brings corrections also into the discussion on the interpretation of relief scenes on the altars. There are various versions of attributing the kitharode and a god with a trident, as well as their companions. Temples of Zeus an Apollo functioned at the temenos where the published items were found. Relief scenes on analyzed arulae at least for habitants of Olbia depicted the gods worshipped here. The god with a trident was Zeus for them, not Poseidon, while the god with a kithara was Apollo, not Orpheus. Accordingly, the order of personages on such thymiateria for Olbian worshippers was as following: Zeus, Nike, Dionysus and Apollo. Images of various gods on a single item could reflect the need to worship many gods at once during the cultic practices at home. The arulae could be produced within the sacral precinct for the needs of family cults, as they are often found in houses. Probably the very scenes as a set of main cults were the reason of rapid spread of such arulae in the Greek world.","PeriodicalId":37391,"journal":{"name":"Arheologia Moldovei","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arheologia Moldovei","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15407/arheologia2022.02.105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Аrulae bearing four standard relief scenes on their sides are discussed in the paper and mapped on the area of their spread in Pontic region. Their origin is being discussed for almost a century. According to number of finds, Southern Italy was believed to be the place of their production, while according to the analogies on mouldmade pottery it was Athens. However, a find of such item made of imported clay in Athens, as well as quantitative prevailing of them in the Black Sea region allow presuming the additional centres of their production. Most of published here terracottas from Olbia were found in a botros at the Central temenos where a coroplast’s workshop had functioned. No mould for arulae production was discovered there, but their significant number, the variations in décor and size of the upper part, finds of smaller size arulae of the next generation of mould, as well as manufactural techniques peculiar for Olbian coroplastics of the 2nd century BC allow presuming the local production of these items. It is revealed that the height of the area above the denticule between the palmettes depended on processing by hand and varied significantly. It means that such an indicator as size of the altars should not be considered as decisive in determining of their origin. The publication of Olbian finds brings corrections also into the discussion on the interpretation of relief scenes on the altars. There are various versions of attributing the kitharode and a god with a trident, as well as their companions. Temples of Zeus an Apollo functioned at the temenos where the published items were found. Relief scenes on analyzed arulae at least for habitants of Olbia depicted the gods worshipped here. The god with a trident was Zeus for them, not Poseidon, while the god with a kithara was Apollo, not Orpheus. Accordingly, the order of personages on such thymiateria for Olbian worshippers was as following: Zeus, Nike, Dionysus and Apollo. Images of various gods on a single item could reflect the need to worship many gods at once during the cultic practices at home. The arulae could be produced within the sacral precinct for the needs of family cults, as they are often found in houses. Probably the very scenes as a set of main cults were the reason of rapid spread of such arulae in the Greek world.
奥尔比亚粘土小型祭坛
Аrulae在它们的侧面有四个标准的浮雕场景,在论文中进行了讨论,并绘制了它们在蓬蒂克地区的分布区域。它们的起源被讨论了将近一个世纪。根据发现的数量,意大利南部被认为是他们的生产地,而根据模塑陶器的类比,它是雅典。然而,在雅典发现了用进口粘土制成的这种物品,以及在黑海地区大量发现这种物品,可以推测它们的生产中心。在这里发表的大多数来自奥尔比亚的陶土都是在中央temenos的一个botros中发现的,那里曾是coroplasast的车间。在那里没有发现生产芝麻豆的模具,但它们的数量可观,上部的直径和大小的变化,下一代模具的较小尺寸的芝麻豆的发现,以及公元前2世纪奥尔比亚coroplastics特有的制造技术,使得人们可以假设这些物品是在当地生产的。结果表明,棕榈间小齿以上区域的高度取决于手工加工,且差异显著。这意味着像祭坛大小这样的指标不应被视为确定其起源的决定性因素。奥比安发现的出版也为祭坛上浮雕场景的解释带来了修正。有各种各样的版本归因于基塔罗德和一个神与三叉戟,以及他们的同伴。宙斯神庙和阿波罗神庙就坐落在发现这些出版物的地方。至少对奥尔比亚的居民来说,分析过的小豆瓣上的浮雕描绘了这里崇拜的神灵。对他们来说,拿着三叉戟的神是宙斯,而不是波塞冬;拿着基特拉的神是阿波罗,而不是俄耳甫斯。因此,奥尔比亚崇拜者在这些胸神表上的人物顺序如下:宙斯、耐克、狄俄尼索斯和阿波罗。在一件物品上的各种神的图像可以反映出在家里的崇拜活动中需要同时崇拜许多神。由于家庭崇拜的需要,可以在宗教区域内生产小丸,因为它们经常在房屋中找到。可能正是这些场景作为一套主要的邪教是这些小玩意在希腊世界迅速传播的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arheologia Moldovei
Arheologia Moldovei Arts and Humanities-Archeology (arts and humanities)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Arheologia Moldovei is one of the most prestigious Romanian scientific journals in the field of Archaeology, issued since 1961 by the Institute of Archaeology in Iasi, under the aegis of the Romanian Academy. Since 1990 the issues of the journal are published yearly. The journal publishes larger studies, papers, as well as notes and reviews pertaining to all fields of Archaeology, in terms of both chronology (from prehistory to the Middle Ages) and thematic (from theoretical essays to excavation reports and archaeometry). The languages of publication are English, German, French and Romanian (the latter with with larger English abstracts).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信