Real-world experience with new migraine treatments in Brazil

A. Krymchantowski, A. G. Krymchantowski, C. Jevoux
{"title":"Real-world experience with new migraine treatments in Brazil","authors":"A. Krymchantowski, A. G. Krymchantowski, C. Jevoux","doi":"10.52329/AVANMED.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Migraine is a highly prevalent disorder. Current treatments are far from desired regarding efficacy and tolerability. Recent knowledge has been indicating targets whose antagonism may improve outcomes. Blocking CGRP or its receptor with monoclonal antibodies (mAb) can interfere with migraine mechanisms and decrease the frequency of attacks. Erenumab, galcanezumab, fremanezumab and epitnezumab were recently approved for migraine treatment and the first three are available in Brazil. Although the figures of efficacy were not astonishing, tolerability and higher adherence were demonstrated. However, real-world experience is limited in Brazil, since these new therapies have been used for only a year. Objective We present a summary of pivotal studies with the four mAb and preliminary results of this short-term option for migraine in real-world Brazilian patients. Methods One hundred twelve episodic or chronic migraineurs received the prescription of a mAb during the last 12 months in a tertiary center. This initial study was performed with 83 patients who should have taken, at the time of this writing, at least three-monthly doses of a mAb, which was chosen by a neurologist with full time dedication to headache medicine. Results Sixty-four women (77.1%) and 19 men (22.9%), with episodic (n=49; 59%) or chronic migraine (n=34; 41%), mean age of 43.6 years and mean headache history of 26.2 years were retrospectively studied. Baseline frequency was 14.8 headache days/month in the three months prior to the mAb use. Erenumab was prescribed to 40 (48.2%) patients; galcanezumab was given to 37 (44.6%) patients and fremanezumab was prescribed to 6 (7.2%) migraineurs. The mean headache frequency among the 77 patients who returned was reduced to 5.6 headache days/month in the following three months. Considering the headache frequency reduction of ≥50%, 44 (57%) migraine sufferers achieved a meaningful decrease. Mild adverse events were presented by 24.6% of the patients. Conclusion The authors present the first Brazilian experience in real-world patients using different mAbs in migraineurs' preventive treatment.","PeriodicalId":8040,"journal":{"name":"Applied Medical Informaticvs","volume":"264 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Medical Informaticvs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52329/AVANMED.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction Migraine is a highly prevalent disorder. Current treatments are far from desired regarding efficacy and tolerability. Recent knowledge has been indicating targets whose antagonism may improve outcomes. Blocking CGRP or its receptor with monoclonal antibodies (mAb) can interfere with migraine mechanisms and decrease the frequency of attacks. Erenumab, galcanezumab, fremanezumab and epitnezumab were recently approved for migraine treatment and the first three are available in Brazil. Although the figures of efficacy were not astonishing, tolerability and higher adherence were demonstrated. However, real-world experience is limited in Brazil, since these new therapies have been used for only a year. Objective We present a summary of pivotal studies with the four mAb and preliminary results of this short-term option for migraine in real-world Brazilian patients. Methods One hundred twelve episodic or chronic migraineurs received the prescription of a mAb during the last 12 months in a tertiary center. This initial study was performed with 83 patients who should have taken, at the time of this writing, at least three-monthly doses of a mAb, which was chosen by a neurologist with full time dedication to headache medicine. Results Sixty-four women (77.1%) and 19 men (22.9%), with episodic (n=49; 59%) or chronic migraine (n=34; 41%), mean age of 43.6 years and mean headache history of 26.2 years were retrospectively studied. Baseline frequency was 14.8 headache days/month in the three months prior to the mAb use. Erenumab was prescribed to 40 (48.2%) patients; galcanezumab was given to 37 (44.6%) patients and fremanezumab was prescribed to 6 (7.2%) migraineurs. The mean headache frequency among the 77 patients who returned was reduced to 5.6 headache days/month in the following three months. Considering the headache frequency reduction of ≥50%, 44 (57%) migraine sufferers achieved a meaningful decrease. Mild adverse events were presented by 24.6% of the patients. Conclusion The authors present the first Brazilian experience in real-world patients using different mAbs in migraineurs' preventive treatment.
巴西偏头痛新疗法的实际经验
偏头痛是一种非常普遍的疾病。目前的治疗方法在疗效和耐受性方面还远远不够理想。最近的知识已经表明其拮抗靶点可能改善结果。用单克隆抗体(mAb)阻断CGRP或其受体可以干扰偏头痛的机制并减少发作频率。Erenumab、galcanezumab、fremanezumab和epitnezumab最近被批准用于偏头痛治疗,前三种药物已在巴西上市。虽然疗效数字并不惊人,但耐受性和更高的依从性被证明。然而,巴西的实际经验有限,因为这些新疗法只使用了一年。我们总结了四种单抗的关键研究,并对巴西偏头痛患者的短期治疗结果进行了初步研究。方法12个月内在某三级医院接受单抗治疗的112例发作性或慢性偏头痛患者。这项初步研究对83名患者进行了研究,这些患者在撰写本文时应该服用至少三个月剂量的单抗,这是由一位全职致力于头痛医学的神经学家选择的。结果女性64例(77.1%),男性19例(22.9%),发作性(n=49;59%)或慢性偏头痛(n=34;41%),平均年龄43.6岁,平均头痛史26.2年。在使用单抗前的三个月,基线频率为14.8头痛天/月。给40例(48.2%)患者开了Erenumab;37例(44.6%)偏头痛患者接受Galcanezumab治疗,6例(7.2%)偏头痛患者接受fremanezumab治疗。在接下来的三个月里,77名患者的平均头痛频率减少到5.6天/月。考虑到头痛频率降低≥50%,44例(57%)偏头痛患者实现了有意义的减少。24.6%的患者出现轻度不良事件。作者提出了巴西在现实世界患者中使用不同单克隆抗体进行偏头痛预防治疗的第一个经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信