Meat Parting Food in the Funeral Rite of the Dnipro-Prut Babyne Culture

Q4 Arts and Humanities
R. Lytvynenko
{"title":"Meat Parting Food in the Funeral Rite of the Dnipro-Prut Babyne Culture","authors":"R. Lytvynenko","doi":"10.15407/arheologia2023.02.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the funeral rites of many archaeological cultures of the Bronze Age of Eastern Europe, it was practiced to accompany the deceased with the afterlife food, in particular meat, which is documented on the basis of animal bones in graves. This practice had taken place among pastoralists who left behind the sites of the Babyne Cultural circle. Among three Babyne’s cultures, only one — the Dnipro-Prut culture (DPBC) — lacks research on funerary meat food, which is not only an element of the burial ritual, but also serves as an important criterion for the cultural attribution of burials. The purpose of this paper is to describe and evaluate the informative potential of parting meat food of the DPBC. The operational arsenal of research includes methods of statistics, correlation, planigraphy and cartography. As a result of the study, it became clear that all three local variants of the DPBC (Dnipro-Dnister, Dnipro-Buh and Dnister-Prut) are characterised by a similar list of varieties of meat food (remains of ribs, vertebrae, tailbone, and legs of domestic animals, mostly sheep and bulls (fig. 1; 2). Along with this similarity, there were certain differences in the specific gravity and placement of the mentioned varieties of meat food in each local variant of the DPBC. Moreover, there were variations in the specific gravity and placement in the grave of the food in each local variant of the DPBC (tab. 1—4). The given facts, on the one hand, confirm the correctness of the selection of the DPBС itself in the structure of the Babyne cultural circle, as well as the selection of local variants in the structure of the DPBC, and on the other hand, demonstrate its difference from two other Babyne cultures — Dnipro-Don and Volga-Don — whose burial rite was characterised by completely different sets of bones of domestic animals (fig. 3). In addition, the meat food in the burials, in combination with other data, demonstrates the heredity between successive cultures of the Middle—Late Bronze Age, in our case Catacomb — Babyne — Zrubna cultures.","PeriodicalId":37391,"journal":{"name":"Arheologia Moldovei","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arheologia Moldovei","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15407/arheologia2023.02.022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the funeral rites of many archaeological cultures of the Bronze Age of Eastern Europe, it was practiced to accompany the deceased with the afterlife food, in particular meat, which is documented on the basis of animal bones in graves. This practice had taken place among pastoralists who left behind the sites of the Babyne Cultural circle. Among three Babyne’s cultures, only one — the Dnipro-Prut culture (DPBC) — lacks research on funerary meat food, which is not only an element of the burial ritual, but also serves as an important criterion for the cultural attribution of burials. The purpose of this paper is to describe and evaluate the informative potential of parting meat food of the DPBC. The operational arsenal of research includes methods of statistics, correlation, planigraphy and cartography. As a result of the study, it became clear that all three local variants of the DPBC (Dnipro-Dnister, Dnipro-Buh and Dnister-Prut) are characterised by a similar list of varieties of meat food (remains of ribs, vertebrae, tailbone, and legs of domestic animals, mostly sheep and bulls (fig. 1; 2). Along with this similarity, there were certain differences in the specific gravity and placement of the mentioned varieties of meat food in each local variant of the DPBC. Moreover, there were variations in the specific gravity and placement in the grave of the food in each local variant of the DPBC (tab. 1—4). The given facts, on the one hand, confirm the correctness of the selection of the DPBС itself in the structure of the Babyne cultural circle, as well as the selection of local variants in the structure of the DPBC, and on the other hand, demonstrate its difference from two other Babyne cultures — Dnipro-Don and Volga-Don — whose burial rite was characterised by completely different sets of bones of domestic animals (fig. 3). In addition, the meat food in the burials, in combination with other data, demonstrates the heredity between successive cultures of the Middle—Late Bronze Age, in our case Catacomb — Babyne — Zrubna cultures.
第聂伯-普鲁特族婴儿文化丧礼中的肉分食物
在东欧青铜时代的许多考古文化的丧葬仪式中,人们习惯用来世的食物陪伴死者,特别是肉,这是根据坟墓中的动物骨头记录的。这种做法发生在离开巴比伦文化圈遗址的牧民中。在三个巴比伦文化中,只有第聂伯-普鲁特文化(DPBC)缺乏对随葬品的研究,这不仅是丧葬仪式的一个元素,也是墓葬文化归属的重要标准。本文的目的是描述和评估分离肉食品的信息潜力的DPBC。可操作的研究方法包括统计学、相关性、平面学和地图学。研究结果表明,DPBC的所有三种本地变体(Dnipro-Dnister, Dnipro-Buh和Dnister-Prut)都具有相似的肉类食物种类(家畜(主要是羊和牛)的肋骨、椎骨、尾骨和腿的残骸)(图1;2)在这种相似性的同时,上述肉食品品种在各地区的比重和位置也存在一定的差异。此外,在DPBC的每个地方变种中,食物的比重和在坟墓中的位置也有所不同。1 - 4)。给定的事实一方面证实了DPBС在巴比伦文化圈结构中自身选择的正确性,以及在DPBC结构中对当地变体的选择的正确性,另一方面也证明了它与另外两个巴比伦文化——第聂伯河-顿河和伏尔加-顿河-的差异他们的埋葬仪式的特点是使用完全不同的家畜骨骼(图3)。此外,墓葬中的肉类食物,结合其他数据,证明了青铜器时代中晚期连续文化之间的遗传,在我们的案例中是Catacomb - Babyne - Zrubna文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arheologia Moldovei
Arheologia Moldovei Arts and Humanities-Archeology (arts and humanities)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Arheologia Moldovei is one of the most prestigious Romanian scientific journals in the field of Archaeology, issued since 1961 by the Institute of Archaeology in Iasi, under the aegis of the Romanian Academy. Since 1990 the issues of the journal are published yearly. The journal publishes larger studies, papers, as well as notes and reviews pertaining to all fields of Archaeology, in terms of both chronology (from prehistory to the Middle Ages) and thematic (from theoretical essays to excavation reports and archaeometry). The languages of publication are English, German, French and Romanian (the latter with with larger English abstracts).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信