A Method for Measuring In-Plane Forming Limit Curves Using 2D Digital Image Correlation

IF 0.6 Q4 TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Akshat Agha, F. Abu-Farha
{"title":"A Method for Measuring In-Plane Forming Limit Curves Using 2D Digital\n Image Correlation","authors":"Akshat Agha, F. Abu-Farha","doi":"10.4271/05-16-03-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the introduction of advanced lightweight materials with complex\n microstructures and behaviors, more focus is put on the accurate determination\n of their forming limits, and that can only be possible through experiments as\n the conventional theoretical models for the forming limit curve (FLC) prediction\n fail to perform. Despite that, CAE engineers, designers, and toolmakers still\n rely heavily on theoretical models due to the steep costs associated with\n formability testing, including mechanical setup, a large number of tests, and\n the cost of a stereo digital image correlation (DIC) system. The international\n standard ISO 12004-2:2021 recommends using a stereo DIC system for formability\n testing since two-dimensional (2D) DIC systems are considered incapable of\n producing reliable strains due to errors associated with out-of-plane motion and\n deformation. This work challenges that notion and proposes a simple strain\n compensation method for the determination of FLCs using a low-cost single-camera\n (2D) DIC system. In this study, formability tests are performed on an\n automotive-grade 6xxx series aluminum alloy using the Marciniak in-plane FLC\n testing method. The tests are performed on a custom setup that enables\n simultaneous optical strain measurements using a stereo DIC as well as a 2D DIC\n system. The results show how 2D DIC FLC points match those obtained by stereo\n DIC using two popular FLC approaches: ISO 12004-2 section-based spatial method\n and a time-dependent linear best fit (LBF) method.","PeriodicalId":45859,"journal":{"name":"SAE International Journal of Materials and Manufacturing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAE International Journal of Materials and Manufacturing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/05-16-03-0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

With the introduction of advanced lightweight materials with complex microstructures and behaviors, more focus is put on the accurate determination of their forming limits, and that can only be possible through experiments as the conventional theoretical models for the forming limit curve (FLC) prediction fail to perform. Despite that, CAE engineers, designers, and toolmakers still rely heavily on theoretical models due to the steep costs associated with formability testing, including mechanical setup, a large number of tests, and the cost of a stereo digital image correlation (DIC) system. The international standard ISO 12004-2:2021 recommends using a stereo DIC system for formability testing since two-dimensional (2D) DIC systems are considered incapable of producing reliable strains due to errors associated with out-of-plane motion and deformation. This work challenges that notion and proposes a simple strain compensation method for the determination of FLCs using a low-cost single-camera (2D) DIC system. In this study, formability tests are performed on an automotive-grade 6xxx series aluminum alloy using the Marciniak in-plane FLC testing method. The tests are performed on a custom setup that enables simultaneous optical strain measurements using a stereo DIC as well as a 2D DIC system. The results show how 2D DIC FLC points match those obtained by stereo DIC using two popular FLC approaches: ISO 12004-2 section-based spatial method and a time-dependent linear best fit (LBF) method.
二维数字图像相关测量平面内成形极限曲线的方法
随着具有复杂微观结构和行为的先进轻量化材料的引入,人们越来越关注其成形极限的精确确定,而传统的理论模型无法预测成形极限曲线(FLC),因此只能通过实验来实现。尽管如此,由于与成形性测试相关的高昂成本(包括机械设置、大量测试和立体数字图像相关(DIC)系统的成本),CAE工程师、设计师和工具制造商仍然严重依赖理论模型。国际标准ISO 2004- 2:21 21建议使用立体DIC系统进行成形性测试,因为二维(2D) DIC系统由于与面外运动和变形相关的误差而被认为无法产生可靠的应变。这项工作挑战了这一概念,并提出了一种简单的应变补偿方法,用于使用低成本的单相机(2D) DIC系统来确定FLCs。本研究采用Marciniak平面内FLC试验方法对某汽车级6xxx系列铝合金进行成形性试验。测试是在一个定制的设置上进行的,该设置可以使用立体DIC和二维DIC系统同时进行光学应变测量。结果表明,采用ISO 12004-2基于剖面的空间方法和基于时间的线性最佳拟合(LBF)方法,二维DIC FLC点与立体DIC得到的FLC点相匹配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SAE International Journal of Materials and Manufacturing
SAE International Journal of Materials and Manufacturing TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信