Harikrishnan Ramachandran, Jayashree Purkayastha, L. Lewis, Ramesh Bhat Yellanthoor, Apurv Barche, Sneha J. Andrade
{"title":"Levetiracetam as the First-line Antiepileptic in Neonatal Seizures","authors":"Harikrishnan Ramachandran, Jayashree Purkayastha, L. Lewis, Ramesh Bhat Yellanthoor, Apurv Barche, Sneha J. Andrade","doi":"10.22038/IJN.2020.47926.1822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The quest persists for an ideal newer antiepileptic drug (AED) with better efficacy and tolerability. Levetiracetam (LEV) is one of these AEDs with a novel mechanism of action, good pharmacokinetic profile, acceptable tolerability, and side-effect profile. The present study assessed the safety and efficacy of intravenous levetiracetam as a first-line AED in neonatal seizures.Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted on all term neonates with seizures admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of a tertiary care center. Neonates with hypoglycemia, hypocalcemia, hypomagnesemia, inborn errors of metabolism, or those who received other AEDs prior to admission were excluded from the study. 20mg/kg Intravenous LEV was administered as first-line AED and graded up to 40mg/kg if seizures were not controlled in 2 h; thereafter, second-line AED was added.Results: Only 36.2% (21/58) of the cases responded to LEV as first-line AED. Hypoxic Ischaemic Encephalopathy(HIE) was the most common etiology of seizures (55.2%). Subtle seizures were most responsive to LEV (60%), while multifocal clonic seizures (22.3%) responded the least. No adverse effect of LEV was observed during the study period.Conclusion: Only 36.2% of the cases responded to LEV as first-line AED, and subtle seizures were the most responsive seizures. Therefore, the efficacy of LEV as first-line AED in neonatal seizures is yet to be proven by a larger study. There were no adverse effects of LEV during the study period indicating the relative safety of this drug.","PeriodicalId":14584,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Neonatology IJN","volume":"76 1","pages":"39-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Neonatology IJN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/IJN.2020.47926.1822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The quest persists for an ideal newer antiepileptic drug (AED) with better efficacy and tolerability. Levetiracetam (LEV) is one of these AEDs with a novel mechanism of action, good pharmacokinetic profile, acceptable tolerability, and side-effect profile. The present study assessed the safety and efficacy of intravenous levetiracetam as a first-line AED in neonatal seizures.Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted on all term neonates with seizures admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of a tertiary care center. Neonates with hypoglycemia, hypocalcemia, hypomagnesemia, inborn errors of metabolism, or those who received other AEDs prior to admission were excluded from the study. 20mg/kg Intravenous LEV was administered as first-line AED and graded up to 40mg/kg if seizures were not controlled in 2 h; thereafter, second-line AED was added.Results: Only 36.2% (21/58) of the cases responded to LEV as first-line AED. Hypoxic Ischaemic Encephalopathy(HIE) was the most common etiology of seizures (55.2%). Subtle seizures were most responsive to LEV (60%), while multifocal clonic seizures (22.3%) responded the least. No adverse effect of LEV was observed during the study period.Conclusion: Only 36.2% of the cases responded to LEV as first-line AED, and subtle seizures were the most responsive seizures. Therefore, the efficacy of LEV as first-line AED in neonatal seizures is yet to be proven by a larger study. There were no adverse effects of LEV during the study period indicating the relative safety of this drug.