Levetiracetam as the First-line Antiepileptic in Neonatal Seizures

Harikrishnan Ramachandran, Jayashree Purkayastha, L. Lewis, Ramesh Bhat Yellanthoor, Apurv Barche, Sneha J. Andrade
{"title":"Levetiracetam as the First-line Antiepileptic in Neonatal Seizures","authors":"Harikrishnan Ramachandran, Jayashree Purkayastha, L. Lewis, Ramesh Bhat Yellanthoor, Apurv Barche, Sneha J. Andrade","doi":"10.22038/IJN.2020.47926.1822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The quest persists for an ideal newer antiepileptic drug (AED) with better efficacy and tolerability. Levetiracetam (LEV) is one of these AEDs with a novel mechanism of action, good pharmacokinetic profile, acceptable tolerability, and side-effect profile. The present study assessed the safety and efficacy of intravenous levetiracetam as a first-line AED in neonatal seizures.Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted on all term neonates with seizures admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of a tertiary care center. Neonates with hypoglycemia, hypocalcemia, hypomagnesemia, inborn errors of metabolism, or those who received other AEDs prior to admission were excluded from the study. 20mg/kg Intravenous LEV was administered as first-line AED and graded up to 40mg/kg if seizures were not controlled in 2 h; thereafter, second-line AED was added.Results: Only 36.2% (21/58) of the cases responded to LEV as first-line AED. Hypoxic Ischaemic Encephalopathy(HIE) was the most common etiology of seizures (55.2%). Subtle seizures were most responsive to LEV (60%), while multifocal clonic seizures (22.3%) responded the least. No adverse effect of LEV was observed during the study period.Conclusion: Only 36.2% of the cases responded to LEV as first-line AED, and subtle seizures were the most responsive seizures. Therefore, the efficacy of LEV as first-line AED in neonatal seizures is yet to be proven by a larger study. There were no adverse effects of LEV during the study period indicating the relative safety of this drug.","PeriodicalId":14584,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Neonatology IJN","volume":"76 1","pages":"39-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Neonatology IJN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/IJN.2020.47926.1822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The quest persists for an ideal newer antiepileptic drug (AED) with better efficacy and tolerability. Levetiracetam (LEV) is one of these AEDs with a novel mechanism of action, good pharmacokinetic profile, acceptable tolerability, and side-effect profile. The present study assessed the safety and efficacy of intravenous levetiracetam as a first-line AED in neonatal seizures.Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted on all term neonates with seizures admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of a tertiary care center. Neonates with hypoglycemia, hypocalcemia, hypomagnesemia, inborn errors of metabolism, or those who received other AEDs prior to admission were excluded from the study. 20mg/kg Intravenous LEV was administered as first-line AED and graded up to 40mg/kg if seizures were not controlled in 2 h; thereafter, second-line AED was added.Results: Only 36.2% (21/58) of the cases responded to LEV as first-line AED. Hypoxic Ischaemic Encephalopathy(HIE) was the most common etiology of seizures (55.2%). Subtle seizures were most responsive to LEV (60%), while multifocal clonic seizures (22.3%) responded the least. No adverse effect of LEV was observed during the study period.Conclusion: Only 36.2% of the cases responded to LEV as first-line AED, and subtle seizures were the most responsive seizures. Therefore, the efficacy of LEV as first-line AED in neonatal seizures is yet to be proven by a larger study. There were no adverse effects of LEV during the study period indicating the relative safety of this drug.
左乙拉西坦作为新生儿癫痫发作的一线抗癫痫药物
背景:人们一直在寻找一种理想的、疗效更好、耐受性更好的新型抗癫痫药物。左乙拉西坦(LEV)是其中一种作用机制新颖、药动学特征良好、耐受性好、副作用少的抗癫痫药。本研究评估了静脉注射左乙拉西坦作为新生儿癫痫发作的一线AED的安全性和有效性。方法:这项前瞻性观察性研究是对所有在三级护理中心新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)住院的癫痫发作足月新生儿进行的。患有低血糖、低钙、低镁血症、先天性代谢错误或在入院前使用过其他aed的新生儿被排除在研究之外。静脉给予20mg/kg LEV作为一线AED,如果癫痫在2小时内未得到控制,则逐步增加到40mg/kg;此后,增设二线AED。结果:仅36.2%(21/58)的患者对LEV作为一线AED有应答。低氧缺血性脑病(HIE)是癫痫发作最常见的病因(55.2%)。轻微发作对LEV反应最明显(60%),而多灶阵挛发作反应最少(22.3%)。在研究期间未观察到LEV的不良反应。结论:LEV作为一线AED的应答率仅为36.2%,其中轻微发作是最具应答性的。因此,LEV作为一线AED治疗新生儿癫痫发作的疗效尚待更大规模的研究证实。研究期间LEV未出现不良反应,说明该药相对安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信