Mathematics Teachers' Understanding in Developing Learning Indicators in Preparing Lesson Plans

T. Nopriana, Dian Nopitasari, J. Dahlan
{"title":"Mathematics Teachers' Understanding in Developing Learning Indicators in Preparing Lesson Plans","authors":"T. Nopriana, Dian Nopitasari, J. Dahlan","doi":"10.21070/pedagogia.v10i1.859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research on teachers' ability to prepare lesson plans has not shown good results, whereas there have been many studies on efforts to improve teachers in preparing lesson plans. Still, no research explicitly describes the ability of teachers to develop indicators. This research aims to describe the understanding of mathematics teachers in creating learning indicators. This research is quantitative research with a survey method. The sur- vey was conducted on 51 Mathematics Teachers in Cirebon City. The research instrument used was in the form of a questionnaire regarding the indicators of developing learning indicators. The results showed that (1) most teachers still did not understand the steps of developing learning indicators (2) teachers still had difficulty determining operational verbs (KKO) of knowledge, conducting processes, implementation, and evaluation, (3) there were still teachers who thought the affective and psychomotor aspects could not be assessed in mathematics, (4) most teachers have developed at least three indicators in a basic competency, while almost half of the sample assumes the characteristics of students and schools do not affect developing learning indicators.","PeriodicalId":55742,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogia Jurnal Pendidikan","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogia Jurnal Pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21070/pedagogia.v10i1.859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on teachers' ability to prepare lesson plans has not shown good results, whereas there have been many studies on efforts to improve teachers in preparing lesson plans. Still, no research explicitly describes the ability of teachers to develop indicators. This research aims to describe the understanding of mathematics teachers in creating learning indicators. This research is quantitative research with a survey method. The sur- vey was conducted on 51 Mathematics Teachers in Cirebon City. The research instrument used was in the form of a questionnaire regarding the indicators of developing learning indicators. The results showed that (1) most teachers still did not understand the steps of developing learning indicators (2) teachers still had difficulty determining operational verbs (KKO) of knowledge, conducting processes, implementation, and evaluation, (3) there were still teachers who thought the affective and psychomotor aspects could not be assessed in mathematics, (4) most teachers have developed at least three indicators in a basic competency, while almost half of the sample assumes the characteristics of students and schools do not affect developing learning indicators.
数学教师对制定教案中学习指标的理解
对教师备课能力的研究还没有显示出好的结果,而对教师备课能力的改进已经有很多研究。然而,没有研究明确描述教师制定指标的能力。本研究旨在描述数学教师在创建学习指标方面的理解。本研究采用调查方法进行定量研究。对锡伯伦市51名数学教师进行了调查。所使用的研究工具是关于制定学习指标的指标的问卷形式。结果表明:(1)大多数教师仍然不了解学习指标的制定步骤;(2)教师仍然难以确定知识的操作动词(KKO),进行过程,实施和评估;(3)仍然有教师认为情感和精神运动方面无法评估数学;(4)大多数教师在基本能力中至少制定了三个指标。虽然几乎一半的样本假设学生和学校的特征不影响制定学习指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信