A federated framework for information systems development—sense making, argumentation or control of information systems development and its research

Pentti Kerola
{"title":"A federated framework for information systems development—sense making, argumentation or control of information systems development and its research","authors":"Pentti Kerola","doi":"10.1016/0959-8022(96)00017-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The main contribution of Hirschheim, Klein and Lyytinen's well-structured and significant paper is the idea of a federated framework for information systems development and its research, based on the social action theories of Habermas and Etzioni. This comment presents the most essential reasons for reformulating the Etzioni dimension (primary domains of changes in ISD) for its adoption into the framework: the matrix of object systems classes. The most essential changes concern the human actor as the ontological subject/object in ISD and its research, and the inclusion of actors in all the categories of differential malleability in the domains of change. Comment is also directed at the metatheoretic nature of their paper and its potential embedded misunderstandings. Awareness of other researchers' frames and their incongruences is especially emphasized in order to increase common sense making in the research community.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100011,"journal":{"name":"Accounting, Management and Information Technologies","volume":"6 1","pages":"Pages 115-125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0959-8022(96)00017-3","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting, Management and Information Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0959802296000173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main contribution of Hirschheim, Klein and Lyytinen's well-structured and significant paper is the idea of a federated framework for information systems development and its research, based on the social action theories of Habermas and Etzioni. This comment presents the most essential reasons for reformulating the Etzioni dimension (primary domains of changes in ISD) for its adoption into the framework: the matrix of object systems classes. The most essential changes concern the human actor as the ontological subject/object in ISD and its research, and the inclusion of actors in all the categories of differential malleability in the domains of change. Comment is also directed at the metatheoretic nature of their paper and its potential embedded misunderstandings. Awareness of other researchers' frames and their incongruences is especially emphasized in order to increase common sense making in the research community.

一个用于信息系统开发的联邦框架——信息系统开发及其研究的意义制定、论证或控制
Hirschheim、Klein和Lyytinen这篇结构良好且意义重大的论文的主要贡献是,基于哈贝马斯和埃齐奥尼的社会行动理论,提出了一个信息系统开发及其研究的联合框架。这个评论提出了重新表述Etzioni维度(ISD的主要变化领域)以将其纳入框架的最重要原因:对象系统类矩阵。最重要的变化涉及到作为ISD及其研究的本体论主体/客体的人类行为者,以及在变化领域中将行为者纳入所有类别的差异可塑性。评论还针对他们的论文的元理论性质及其潜在的嵌入式误解。意识到其他研究人员的框架和他们的不一致是特别强调,以增加常识,使在研究界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信