The New Education: Controversies and Solutions

IF 0.5 Q4 ECONOMICS
M. Golovchin
{"title":"The New Education: Controversies and Solutions","authors":"M. Golovchin","doi":"10.17835/2076-6297.2022.14.4.070-082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the consequences of the evolution of the national education system as a result and source of ideology, which is formed by two parallel paradigms of the development of modern society and the state – traditional and liberal. In Russian education, these paradigms are constantly changing: from state-bureaucratic socialism in the USSR (1917–1990) and liberal reforms in post-Soviet Russia (1990–2000) to educational counter-reforms of the first twenty years of the 21st century. In modern education, a number of solutions still appear, in which a certain ideological structure is laid. An example of this is the expert report of the Center for Strategic Research and the National Research University Higher School of Economics \"Twelve Solutions for a New Education\", the main messages of which boil down to reforming the national educational system according to the liberal model. We pay special attention to the controversy of the ideas of the report on the support of \"elite\" schools instead of solving the current issues of the development of the educational network and infrastructure; on the concentration of methods for solving the problems of teachers in terms of creating conditions for improving their qualifications (ignoring the financial difficulties characteristic of this professional group). Author comes to the conclusion that ideology is important for solving the problems of the education system and its agents, from the standpoint of which the national educational policy is formed. From our point of view, responses to modern challenges to education should provide for the interests and opinions of the scientific and educational community within the framework of “institutional bricolage” (the creation of institutions “from below”, at the expense of the resources of the educational community).","PeriodicalId":43842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Institutional Studies","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Institutional Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2022.14.4.070-082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines the consequences of the evolution of the national education system as a result and source of ideology, which is formed by two parallel paradigms of the development of modern society and the state – traditional and liberal. In Russian education, these paradigms are constantly changing: from state-bureaucratic socialism in the USSR (1917–1990) and liberal reforms in post-Soviet Russia (1990–2000) to educational counter-reforms of the first twenty years of the 21st century. In modern education, a number of solutions still appear, in which a certain ideological structure is laid. An example of this is the expert report of the Center for Strategic Research and the National Research University Higher School of Economics "Twelve Solutions for a New Education", the main messages of which boil down to reforming the national educational system according to the liberal model. We pay special attention to the controversy of the ideas of the report on the support of "elite" schools instead of solving the current issues of the development of the educational network and infrastructure; on the concentration of methods for solving the problems of teachers in terms of creating conditions for improving their qualifications (ignoring the financial difficulties characteristic of this professional group). Author comes to the conclusion that ideology is important for solving the problems of the education system and its agents, from the standpoint of which the national educational policy is formed. From our point of view, responses to modern challenges to education should provide for the interests and opinions of the scientific and educational community within the framework of “institutional bricolage” (the creation of institutions “from below”, at the expense of the resources of the educational community).
新教育:争议与对策
本文考察了由现代社会与国家发展的两种平行范式——传统与自由主义所形成的国民教育制度作为意识形态的结果和根源所演变的后果。在俄罗斯教育中,这些范式不断变化:从苏联的国家官僚社会主义(1917-1990)和后苏联俄罗斯的自由主义改革(1990-2000)到21世纪头二十年的教育反改革。在现代教育中,仍然出现了一些解决方案,其中奠定了一定的思想结构。战略研究中心和国立研究型大学高等经济学院的专家报告《新教育的十二个解决方案》就是一个例子,其主要信息归结为按照自由主义模式改革国家教育体制。我们特别关注报告中关于支持“精英”学校的观点所引起的争议,而不是解决当前教育网络和基础设施发展问题;在为提高教师素质创造条件方面集中解决教师问题的方法(忽略了这一专业群体的经济困难特点)。作者认为,意识形态对于解决教育系统及其代理人的问题具有重要意义,并从国家教育政策形成的角度出发。从我们的观点来看,应对教育面临的现代挑战,应该在“制度拼凑”(以牺牲教育界资源为代价,“自下而上”创建制度)的框架内,为科学界和教育界的利益和意见提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
24
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信