Direct, Absenteeism, and Disability Cost Burden of Obesity Among Privately Insured Employees: A Comparison of Healthcare Industry Versus Other Major Industries in the United States.
A. Ramasamy, F. Laliberté, Shoghag A Aktavoukian, D. Lejeune, M. DerSarkissian, C. Cavanaugh, B. G. Smolarz, R. Ganguly, M. Duh
{"title":"Direct, Absenteeism, and Disability Cost Burden of Obesity Among Privately Insured Employees: A Comparison of Healthcare Industry Versus Other Major Industries in the United States.","authors":"A. Ramasamy, F. Laliberté, Shoghag A Aktavoukian, D. Lejeune, M. DerSarkissian, C. Cavanaugh, B. G. Smolarz, R. Ganguly, M. Duh","doi":"10.1097/JOM.0000000000001761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo compare obesity-related costs of employees of the healthcare industry versus other major US industries.\n\n\nMETHODS\nEmployees with obesity versus without were identified using the Optum Health Reporting and Insights employer claims database (1/2010-3/2017). Employees working in healthcare with obesity were compared to employees of other industries with obesity for absenteeism/disability and direct cost differences. Multivariate models estimated the association between industries and high costs compared to the healthcare industry.\n\n\nRESULTS\nObesity-related absenteeism/disability and direct costs were higher in several US industries compared with the healthcare industry (adjusted cost differences of $-1,220-$5,630). Employees of the government/education/religious services industry (GERS) with obesity (BMI≥30) had significantly higher odds of direct costs ≥80th percentile (odds ratio vs healthcare industry=2.20; P < 0.05).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nRelative to the healthcare industry, employees of other industries, especially GERS, incurred higher obesity-related costs.","PeriodicalId":46545,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000001761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To compare obesity-related costs of employees of the healthcare industry versus other major US industries.
METHODS
Employees with obesity versus without were identified using the Optum Health Reporting and Insights employer claims database (1/2010-3/2017). Employees working in healthcare with obesity were compared to employees of other industries with obesity for absenteeism/disability and direct cost differences. Multivariate models estimated the association between industries and high costs compared to the healthcare industry.
RESULTS
Obesity-related absenteeism/disability and direct costs were higher in several US industries compared with the healthcare industry (adjusted cost differences of $-1,220-$5,630). Employees of the government/education/religious services industry (GERS) with obesity (BMI≥30) had significantly higher odds of direct costs ≥80th percentile (odds ratio vs healthcare industry=2.20; P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Relative to the healthcare industry, employees of other industries, especially GERS, incurred higher obesity-related costs.
目的比较医疗保健行业与美国其他主要行业员工的肥胖相关成本。方法使用Optum Health Reporting and Insights雇主索赔数据库(2010年1月至2017年3月)识别肥胖和非肥胖员工。在医疗保健行业工作的肥胖员工与其他行业的肥胖员工进行了旷工/残疾和直接成本差异的比较。与医疗保健行业相比,多变量模型估计了行业与高成本之间的关联。结果与医疗保健行业相比,美国几个行业与肥胖相关的缺勤/残疾和直接成本更高(调整后的成本差异为-1,220- 5,630美元)。肥胖(BMI≥30)的政府/教育/宗教服务行业(GERS)雇员直接成本(≥80百分位数)的比值显著高于其他行业(与医疗保健行业的比值比=2.20;p < 0.05)。结论与医疗保健行业相比,其他行业员工的肥胖相关成本更高,尤其是ger。