Short Term Therapeutic Effect of Modified Epiretinal Membrane Surgery

Shuai Sheng, Jie Zhang, Rongyu Gao
{"title":"Short Term Therapeutic Effect of Modified Epiretinal Membrane Surgery","authors":"Shuai Sheng, Jie Zhang, Rongyu Gao","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2019.09.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: \nTo compare the early therapeutic effects of modified epiretinal membrane surgery to traditional epiretinal membrane surgery for idiopathic epiretinal membrane (IERM). \n \n \nMethods: \nFrom February to August 2018, 30 eyes of 30 IERM patients who had been treated in Weifang Eye Hospital were selected consecutively and received surgical treatment independently performed by the same physician in Weifang Eye Hospital. The patients were divided into a traditional group and modified group using a simple random method. All 15 eyes in the traditional group were treated with vitrectomy and traditional epiretinal membrane peeling, while all 15 eyes in the modified group were treated with vitrectomy and epiretinal membrane blunt peeling. All patients were reviewed at 1 week,1 month, and 3 months after surgery. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) before and after the operation, the central retina thickness (CRT) (μm) measured by Spectralis OCT, the ganglion cell inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) (μm) measured by ganglion cell analysis (GCA) with Cirrus HD-OCT, the changes in retinal morphology in the macular area, and the amplitude densities and latencies of the P1 waves from the multifocal electroretinogram (mERG). Data were analyzed using t test. \n \n \nResults: \nPostoperative BCVA increased in both groups compared with preoperative measurements and the differences were statistically significant (traditional group: t=4.176, P=0.001; modified group: t=6.187, P<0.001). The BCVA in the modified group was significantly better than that in the traditional group (t=2.219, P=0.035). Postoperative CRT decreased in both groups compared with preoperative CRT and the differences were statistically significant (traditional group: t=5.666, P<0.001; modified group: t=13.905, P<0.001). The CRT in the modified group was significantly lower than that in the traditional group (t=2.144, P=0. 041). GCIPL thickness: There was no significant difference between the two groups before and after surgery, and no significant change before and after surgery (t=-3.350, P=0.066) in the traditional group, but there was an increase after surgery in the modified group (t=-14.148, P<0.001). The P-wave peak of the mERG 1 ring: No significant differences were found between the two groups before surgery (t=0.550, P=0.860). In the two group, there was an increase after surgery (traditional group: t=16.932, P<0.001; modified group: t=-29.701, P<0.001), and the results of the modified group was better than that of the traditional group (t=-20.882, P<0.001). \n \n \nConclusions: \nBlunt peeling of the anterior epiretinal membrane is a practical, simple and safe treatment method. It can effectively restore the morphological structure of the macular area, improve the patient's vision and improve macular function. \n \n \nKey words: \nidiopathic epiretinal membrane; epiretinal membrane peeling; blunt peeling; inner retinal layer","PeriodicalId":10142,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology","volume":"24 1","pages":"703-710"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2019.09.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the early therapeutic effects of modified epiretinal membrane surgery to traditional epiretinal membrane surgery for idiopathic epiretinal membrane (IERM). Methods: From February to August 2018, 30 eyes of 30 IERM patients who had been treated in Weifang Eye Hospital were selected consecutively and received surgical treatment independently performed by the same physician in Weifang Eye Hospital. The patients were divided into a traditional group and modified group using a simple random method. All 15 eyes in the traditional group were treated with vitrectomy and traditional epiretinal membrane peeling, while all 15 eyes in the modified group were treated with vitrectomy and epiretinal membrane blunt peeling. All patients were reviewed at 1 week,1 month, and 3 months after surgery. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) before and after the operation, the central retina thickness (CRT) (μm) measured by Spectralis OCT, the ganglion cell inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) (μm) measured by ganglion cell analysis (GCA) with Cirrus HD-OCT, the changes in retinal morphology in the macular area, and the amplitude densities and latencies of the P1 waves from the multifocal electroretinogram (mERG). Data were analyzed using t test. Results: Postoperative BCVA increased in both groups compared with preoperative measurements and the differences were statistically significant (traditional group: t=4.176, P=0.001; modified group: t=6.187, P<0.001). The BCVA in the modified group was significantly better than that in the traditional group (t=2.219, P=0.035). Postoperative CRT decreased in both groups compared with preoperative CRT and the differences were statistically significant (traditional group: t=5.666, P<0.001; modified group: t=13.905, P<0.001). The CRT in the modified group was significantly lower than that in the traditional group (t=2.144, P=0. 041). GCIPL thickness: There was no significant difference between the two groups before and after surgery, and no significant change before and after surgery (t=-3.350, P=0.066) in the traditional group, but there was an increase after surgery in the modified group (t=-14.148, P<0.001). The P-wave peak of the mERG 1 ring: No significant differences were found between the two groups before surgery (t=0.550, P=0.860). In the two group, there was an increase after surgery (traditional group: t=16.932, P<0.001; modified group: t=-29.701, P<0.001), and the results of the modified group was better than that of the traditional group (t=-20.882, P<0.001). Conclusions: Blunt peeling of the anterior epiretinal membrane is a practical, simple and safe treatment method. It can effectively restore the morphological structure of the macular area, improve the patient's vision and improve macular function. Key words: idiopathic epiretinal membrane; epiretinal membrane peeling; blunt peeling; inner retinal layer
改良视网膜前膜手术的近期疗效
目的:比较改良视网膜前膜手术与传统视网膜前膜手术治疗特发性视网膜前膜(IERM)的早期疗效。方法:选择2018年2月至8月在潍坊眼科医院就诊的30例IERM患者,连续选取30只眼,由潍坊眼科医院同一医师独立进行手术治疗。采用简单随机法将患者分为传统组和改良组。传统组15只眼均行玻璃体切除加传统视网膜前膜剥离,改良组15只眼均行玻璃体切除加视网膜前膜钝性剥离。所有患者在术后1周、1个月和3个月进行复查。手术前后最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、Spectralis OCT测量视网膜中央厚度(CRT) (μm)、Cirrus HD-OCT测量神经节细胞内丛状层(GCIPL) (μm)、黄斑区视网膜形态变化、多焦视网膜电图(mERG) P1波振幅密度和潜伏期。数据分析采用t检验。结果:两组术后BCVA均较术前升高,差异均有统计学意义(传统组:t=4.176, P=0.001;改良组:t=6.187, P<0.001)。改良组BCVA明显优于传统组(t=2.219, P=0.035)。两组术后CRT均较术前降低,差异均有统计学意义(传统组:t=5.666, P<0.001;改良组:t=13.905, P<0.001)。改良组CRT明显低于传统组(t=2.144, P=0。041)。GCIPL厚度:两组术前、术后差异无统计学意义,传统组术前、术后差异无统计学意义(t=-3.350, P=0.066),改良组术后差异有统计学意义(t=-14.148, P<0.001)。mERG - 1环P波峰值:两组术前比较差异无统计学意义(t=0.550, P=0.860)。两组术后比较差异有统计学意义(传统组:t=16.932, P<0.001;改良组:t=-29.701, P<0.001),改良组疗效优于传统组(t=-20.882, P<0.001)。结论:钝性剥脱视网膜前膜是一种实用、简便、安全的治疗方法。能有效恢复黄斑区的形态结构,改善患者视力,改善黄斑功能。关键词:特发性视网膜前膜;视网膜外膜剥离;钝剥落;视网膜内层
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信