Issue segmentation by public agencies: Assessing communication strategies of EU agencies related to Covid-19

IF 2.6 3区 管理学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Moritz Müller, Bert Fraussen
{"title":"Issue segmentation by public agencies: Assessing communication strategies of EU agencies related to Covid-19","authors":"Moritz Müller,&nbsp;Bert Fraussen","doi":"10.1111/gove.12766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>An agency's self-portrayal can help to protect its jurisdictional turf and strengthen its reputational uniqueness. While prior reputational studies have shown that agencies are attentive to the media and political principals, they have not assessed how inter-agency dynamics might shape their public outreach and message. This paper argues that if multiple public agencies are confronted with a shared salient issue, such as the Covid-19 pandemic, they engage in ‘issue segmentation’: mindful of each other's distinct jurisdictional and reputational profiles, their communication centers around sub-issues that do not overlap with core missions of other agencies. We assess this expectation via a study of Twitter communication of 38 European Union agencies related to Covid-19. Using an automated thematic analysis of tweets, we show that agencies engage in issue segmentation and focus on unique sub-issues. The findings contribute to a better understanding of public outreach of agencies in times of crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":48056,"journal":{"name":"Governance-An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions","volume":"37 2","pages":"337-354"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gove.12766","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Governance-An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gove.12766","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An agency's self-portrayal can help to protect its jurisdictional turf and strengthen its reputational uniqueness. While prior reputational studies have shown that agencies are attentive to the media and political principals, they have not assessed how inter-agency dynamics might shape their public outreach and message. This paper argues that if multiple public agencies are confronted with a shared salient issue, such as the Covid-19 pandemic, they engage in ‘issue segmentation’: mindful of each other's distinct jurisdictional and reputational profiles, their communication centers around sub-issues that do not overlap with core missions of other agencies. We assess this expectation via a study of Twitter communication of 38 European Union agencies related to Covid-19. Using an automated thematic analysis of tweets, we show that agencies engage in issue segmentation and focus on unique sub-issues. The findings contribute to a better understanding of public outreach of agencies in times of crisis.

Abstract Image

公共机构的问题细分:评估欧盟机构与 Covid-19 有关的传播战略
机构的自我形象有助于保护其管辖范围并加强其声誉的独特性。以往的声誉研究表明,机构会关注媒体和政治负责人,但却没有评估机构间的动态如何影响其公共宣传和信息。本文认为,如果多个公共机构面临一个共同的突出问题,如 Covid-19 大流行病,它们就会进行 "问题细分":考虑到彼此不同的管辖范围和声誉特征,它们的沟通会围绕与其他机构的核心任务不重叠的子问题进行。我们通过对欧盟 38 个机构有关 Covid-19 的 Twitter 传播进行研究,评估了这一预期。通过对推文进行自动主题分析,我们发现各机构对问题进行了细分,并将重点放在了独特的子问题上。研究结果有助于更好地理解危机时期各机构的公共宣传工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
10.30%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Governance provides a forum for the theoretical and practical discussion of executive politics, public policy, administration, and the organization of the state. Published in association with International Political Science Association''s Research Committee on the Structure & Organization of Government (SOG), it emphasizes peer-reviewed articles that take an international or comparative approach to public policy and administration. All papers, regardless of empirical focus, should have wider theoretical, comparative, or practical significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信