Synchronous Versus Asynchronous: Pre-Service Teachers’ Performance in Science Formative Assessment Tests

Philip Dorsah, Abdul-Ganiu Alhassan
{"title":"Synchronous Versus Asynchronous: Pre-Service Teachers’ Performance in Science Formative Assessment Tests","authors":"Philip Dorsah, Abdul-Ganiu Alhassan","doi":"10.4236/OALIB.1107193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the study was to assess the performance of pre-service teachers in three science formative assessment tests in an online learning environment. The participants consisted of 138 pre-service teachers (57 participated in synchronous session and 81 participated in asynchronous sessions). The study used a quasi-experimental design, non-equivalent groups post-test only. Tests were used to collect the data: Energy Concept Test (ECT), Teaching Energy Concept Test (TECT) and Basic Electronics Concept Test (BECT). ANOVA results revealed a significant effect of type of test on test scores of students at the p","PeriodicalId":19593,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Library Journal","volume":"25 1","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Library Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/OALIB.1107193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to assess the performance of pre-service teachers in three science formative assessment tests in an online learning environment. The participants consisted of 138 pre-service teachers (57 participated in synchronous session and 81 participated in asynchronous sessions). The study used a quasi-experimental design, non-equivalent groups post-test only. Tests were used to collect the data: Energy Concept Test (ECT), Teaching Energy Concept Test (TECT) and Basic Electronics Concept Test (BECT). ANOVA results revealed a significant effect of type of test on test scores of students at the p
同步与非同步:职前教师在科学形成性评估测验中的表现
本研究的目的是评估职前教师在在线学习环境下的三个科学形成性评估测试中的表现。研究对象为138名职前教师(同步组57人,非同步组81人)。本研究采用准实验设计,非等效组仅进行后测。采用能量概念测试(ECT)、教学能量概念测试(TECT)和基础电子学概念测试(BECT)来收集数据。方差分析结果显示,考试类型对学生考试成绩有显著影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信