The psychiatrist as gaoler

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
M. Cavadino
{"title":"The psychiatrist as gaoler","authors":"M. Cavadino","doi":"10.1080/09585189908402157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Psychiatrists have a number of ‘gaoler roles’: that is, they are involved in the detention and compulsory treatment of patients for the protection of others rather than for the good of the patient. Psychiatrists often feel uneasy about these roles, and may even deny that they exercise them. In principle—an argument based on human rights theory—it can be justifiable for the state to ‘gaol’ in appropriate cases. One line of argument contends that, none the less, this should not be the job of doctors. This argument is rejected in principle. Moreover, in practice psychiatrists will inevitably take other people's interests into account whether consciously or not, and political reality dictates that psychiatrists cannot escape their gaoler function.","PeriodicalId":47524,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"1999-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09585189908402157","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract Psychiatrists have a number of ‘gaoler roles’: that is, they are involved in the detention and compulsory treatment of patients for the protection of others rather than for the good of the patient. Psychiatrists often feel uneasy about these roles, and may even deny that they exercise them. In principle—an argument based on human rights theory—it can be justifiable for the state to ‘gaol’ in appropriate cases. One line of argument contends that, none the less, this should not be the job of doctors. This argument is rejected in principle. Moreover, in practice psychiatrists will inevitably take other people's interests into account whether consciously or not, and political reality dictates that psychiatrists cannot escape their gaoler function.
精神科医生作为狱卒
精神科医生扮演着许多“狱吏的角色”:也就是说,他们参与对病人的拘留和强制治疗是为了保护他人,而不是为了病人的利益。精神科医生经常对这些角色感到不安,甚至可能否认他们行使这些角色。原则上——一个基于人权理论的论点——国家在适当的情况下“监禁”是合理的。一种观点认为,尽管如此,这不应该是医生的工作。这一论点在原则上被否定了。此外,在实践中,精神科医生不可避免地会有意无意地考虑到他人的利益,而政治现实决定了精神科医生无法逃避他们的狱吏职能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信