Volatility During the Financial Crisis Through the Lens of High Frequency Data: A Realized GARCH Approach

Denisa Banulescu Radu, P. Hansen, Zhuo Huang, Marius Matei
{"title":"Volatility During the Financial Crisis Through the Lens of High Frequency Data: A Realized GARCH Approach","authors":"Denisa Banulescu Radu, P. Hansen, Zhuo Huang, Marius Matei","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3178890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study financial volatility during the Global Financial Crisis and use the largest volatility shocks to identify major events during the crisis. Our analysis makes extensive use of high-frequency financial data to model volatility and to determine the timing within the day when the largest volatility shocks occurred. The latter helps us identify the events that may be associated with each of these shocks, and serves to illustrate the benefits of using high-frequency data. Some of the largest volatility shocks coincide, not surprisingly, with the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers on September 15, 2008 and Congress’s failure to pass the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act on September 29, 2008. Yet, the largest volatility shock was on February 27, 2007, the date when Freddie Mac announced a stricter policy for underwriting subprime loans and a date that was marked by a crash on the Chinese stock market. However, the intraday high-frequency data shows that the main culprit was a computer glitch in the trading system. The days with the largest drops in volatility can in most cases be related to interventions by governments and central banks.","PeriodicalId":20862,"journal":{"name":"PSN: International Financial Crises (Topic)","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: International Financial Crises (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3178890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

We study financial volatility during the Global Financial Crisis and use the largest volatility shocks to identify major events during the crisis. Our analysis makes extensive use of high-frequency financial data to model volatility and to determine the timing within the day when the largest volatility shocks occurred. The latter helps us identify the events that may be associated with each of these shocks, and serves to illustrate the benefits of using high-frequency data. Some of the largest volatility shocks coincide, not surprisingly, with the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers on September 15, 2008 and Congress’s failure to pass the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act on September 29, 2008. Yet, the largest volatility shock was on February 27, 2007, the date when Freddie Mac announced a stricter policy for underwriting subprime loans and a date that was marked by a crash on the Chinese stock market. However, the intraday high-frequency data shows that the main culprit was a computer glitch in the trading system. The days with the largest drops in volatility can in most cases be related to interventions by governments and central banks.
金融危机期间高频数据下的波动:一种已实现的GARCH方法
我们研究了全球金融危机期间的金融波动,并利用最大波动冲击来识别危机期间的重大事件。我们的分析广泛使用高频金融数据来模拟波动率,并确定一天中最大波动冲击发生的时间。后者帮助我们识别可能与这些冲击相关的事件,并有助于说明使用高频数据的好处。一些最大的波动冲击不出所地与2008年9月15日雷曼兄弟破产和9月29日国会未能通过《紧急经济稳定法案》同时发生。然而,最大的波动冲击发生在2007年2月27日,当天房地美宣布了一项更严格的次级贷款承销政策,而中国股市也在这一天崩盘。然而,盘中高频数据显示,罪魁祸首是交易系统中的计算机故障。在大多数情况下,波动性降幅最大的日子可能与政府和央行的干预有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信