Analisis Pertanyaan Pada Buku Teks Kimia SMA ANALISIS PERTANYAAN PADA BUKU TEKS KIMIA SMA KELAS X BERDASARKAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS

Burhanudin Milama, Rahmah Nur Sabrina, Luki Yunita
{"title":"Analisis Pertanyaan Pada Buku Teks Kimia SMA ANALISIS PERTANYAAN PADA BUKU TEKS KIMIA SMA KELAS X BERDASARKAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS","authors":"Burhanudin Milama, Rahmah Nur Sabrina, Luki Yunita","doi":"10.15575/jtk.v7i1.4973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chemistry textbooks' questions are important in improving students' thinking skills. Various types of questions are developed, but the effectiveness of these questions in supporting student success is something that is not expressed enough. This study aims to determine aspects of critical thinking skills developed in questions in the Chemistry High School textbook. The research method used is a descriptive method and multistage sampling technique. There are six books analyzed. The research instrument used was in the form of observation sheets classifying questions based on indicators of critical thinking skills. The results showed that the questions developed in Chemistry textbooks were analyzed based on critical thinking skills, including aspects of making simple explanations with a percentage of 28.8%, building basic skills of 20.3%, concluding at 45.8%, giving further explanations of 3.4%, and set strategy and tactics of 1.7%. The questions developed are dominated by concluding questions. Thus, it can be concluded that the questions in the Chemistry High School textbook have not been developed evenly on the five aspects of critical thinking.","PeriodicalId":33527,"journal":{"name":"JTK Jurnal Tadris Kimiya","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTK Jurnal Tadris Kimiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15575/jtk.v7i1.4973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chemistry textbooks' questions are important in improving students' thinking skills. Various types of questions are developed, but the effectiveness of these questions in supporting student success is something that is not expressed enough. This study aims to determine aspects of critical thinking skills developed in questions in the Chemistry High School textbook. The research method used is a descriptive method and multistage sampling technique. There are six books analyzed. The research instrument used was in the form of observation sheets classifying questions based on indicators of critical thinking skills. The results showed that the questions developed in Chemistry textbooks were analyzed based on critical thinking skills, including aspects of making simple explanations with a percentage of 28.8%, building basic skills of 20.3%, concluding at 45.8%, giving further explanations of 3.4%, and set strategy and tactics of 1.7%. The questions developed are dominated by concluding questions. Thus, it can be concluded that the questions in the Chemistry High School textbook have not been developed evenly on the five aspects of critical thinking.
根据批判性思维能力对高中化学课本上的问题分析
化学教材中的问题对提高学生的思维能力具有重要意义。各种各样的问题被开发出来,但这些问题在支持学生成功方面的有效性还没有得到足够的表达。本研究旨在确定高中化学教科书中问题所培养的批判性思维能力的各个方面。研究方法采用描述法和多阶段抽样技术。分析了六本书。使用的研究工具是以观察表的形式,根据批判性思维技能的指标对问题进行分类。结果表明,化学教科书中所开发的问题是基于批判性思维技能进行分析的,其中简单解释占28.8%,构建基本技能占20.3%,结论占45.8%,进一步解释占3.4%,设定策略和战术占1.7%。提出的问题以结论性问题为主。由此可见,高中化学教材中的问题在批判性思维的五个方面发展得并不均匀。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信