Effectiveness of a Dietitian-led Healthy Lifestyle Education Package in Improving Health Behaviours of Stroke Survivors in Malaysia: A Pilot Study

H. Wong, S. Harith, P. L. Lua, Khairul Azmi Ibrahim
{"title":"Effectiveness of a Dietitian-led Healthy Lifestyle Education Package in Improving Health Behaviours of Stroke Survivors in Malaysia: A Pilot Study","authors":"H. Wong, S. Harith, P. L. Lua, Khairul Azmi Ibrahim","doi":"10.31436/imjm.v22i2.2182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Despite a higher risk of a recurrent cerebrovascular event, many stroke survivors failed to achieve their targeted treatment goals. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of a dietitian-led healthy lifestyle educational package targeted at improving stroke risk factors and lifestyle practices among stroke survivors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A quasi-experimental pilot study was undertaken in general medical wards of two public hospitals in Malaysia. Patients were allocated into either intervention or control groups based on the week of screening. Adults aged more than 18 years old, with first-ever stroke, and the willingness of caregivers to participate were included. The intervention group (patient-caregiver dyad) received three dietitian-led healthy lifestyle education sessions underpinned with Health Belief Model and Reflection and Refractive theories and was followed up for three months. The control group received the usual stroke care. Outcome variables included blood pressure, body mass index, waist circumference, dietary intake, physical activity levels, smoking status, alcohol consumption, malnutrition risk, and health-related quality of life. McNemar, Chi-square, and repeated measures Analysis of Covariance tests were conducted to examine the within - and between-group differences. RESULTS: A total of 54 participants (27 in each group) were included in this study. The intervention group had a significantly lower intake of sugar (P=0.002, effect size=0.50) and sodium (P=0.044, effect size=0.31), a lower proportion of active smokers (7% versus 33%, P=0.039), lesser sitting time (P=0.012, effect size=0.37), and lower proportion having pain/discomfort issues (22% versus 63%, P=0.005) than the control group. CONCLUSION: Early dietitian-led lifestyle modification sessions underpinned with behavioural change theories paired with the involvement of family members appear to be beneficial among stroke survivors.","PeriodicalId":13474,"journal":{"name":"IIUM Medical Journal Malaysia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IIUM Medical Journal Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31436/imjm.v22i2.2182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Despite a higher risk of a recurrent cerebrovascular event, many stroke survivors failed to achieve their targeted treatment goals. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of a dietitian-led healthy lifestyle educational package targeted at improving stroke risk factors and lifestyle practices among stroke survivors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A quasi-experimental pilot study was undertaken in general medical wards of two public hospitals in Malaysia. Patients were allocated into either intervention or control groups based on the week of screening. Adults aged more than 18 years old, with first-ever stroke, and the willingness of caregivers to participate were included. The intervention group (patient-caregiver dyad) received three dietitian-led healthy lifestyle education sessions underpinned with Health Belief Model and Reflection and Refractive theories and was followed up for three months. The control group received the usual stroke care. Outcome variables included blood pressure, body mass index, waist circumference, dietary intake, physical activity levels, smoking status, alcohol consumption, malnutrition risk, and health-related quality of life. McNemar, Chi-square, and repeated measures Analysis of Covariance tests were conducted to examine the within - and between-group differences. RESULTS: A total of 54 participants (27 in each group) were included in this study. The intervention group had a significantly lower intake of sugar (P=0.002, effect size=0.50) and sodium (P=0.044, effect size=0.31), a lower proportion of active smokers (7% versus 33%, P=0.039), lesser sitting time (P=0.012, effect size=0.37), and lower proportion having pain/discomfort issues (22% versus 63%, P=0.005) than the control group. CONCLUSION: Early dietitian-led lifestyle modification sessions underpinned with behavioural change theories paired with the involvement of family members appear to be beneficial among stroke survivors.
营养学家主导的健康生活方式教育包在改善马来西亚中风幸存者健康行为方面的有效性:一项试点研究
尽管脑血管事件复发的风险较高,但许多中风幸存者未能实现其目标治疗目标。本研究旨在检查以营养师为主导的健康生活方式教育包的有效性,该教育包旨在改善中风幸存者的中风危险因素和生活方式实践。材料与方法:在马来西亚两家公立医院的普通病房进行了一项准实验性试点研究。根据筛查的周数,将患者分为干预组和对照组。年龄超过18岁、首次中风的成年人,以及护理人员参与的意愿都包括在内。干预组(病人-照顾者两组)接受了以健康信念模型和反射和折射理论为基础的三次由营养师主导的健康生活方式教育,并随访三个月。对照组接受常规中风护理。结果变量包括血压、体重指数、腰围、饮食摄入、体力活动水平、吸烟状况、饮酒、营养不良风险和健康相关生活质量。采用McNemar、卡方和重复测量法进行协方差分析检验,以检验组内和组间差异。结果:本研究共纳入受试者54例,每组27例。干预组的糖(P=0.002,效应值=0.50)和钠(P=0.044,效应值=0.31)的摄入量显著降低,活跃吸烟者的比例较低(7%对33%,P=0.039),静坐时间较短(P=0.012,效应值=0.37),疼痛/不适问题的比例较低(22%对63%,P=0.005)。结论:在行为改变理论的基础上,早期以营养师为主导的生活方式改变会议,加上家庭成员的参与,似乎对中风幸存者有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信