Medical Students’ Performance in Anatomy: Integrated Versus Subject-Based Scores

Sobia Islam, Huma Musarrat Khan, N. Rashid, Lubna Akhtar, Sadia Rashid, Noreen Anwar
{"title":"Medical Students’ Performance in Anatomy: Integrated Versus Subject-Based Scores","authors":"Sobia Islam, Huma Musarrat Khan, N. Rashid, Lubna Akhtar, Sadia Rashid, Noreen Anwar","doi":"10.37185/lns.1.1.329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of the study was to compare the Anatomy scores with Total scores in exams with Integrated results and exams with Subject-based results and to compare the Anatomy scores in exams with Integrated results with exams with Subject-based results.Study Design: Quantitative/observational, retrospective study, with Universal sampling.Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted in the Department of Anatomy of Foundation University School of Health Sciences Islamabad, Pakistan, from 1st May 2022 to 31st August 2022.Materials and Methods: The study was conducted on scores of the First professional examination in two groups of MBBS students; Group A (n=150). The result was based on integrated scores, and Group B (n=149): Result was based on subject score. The mean Anatomy score (AS) percentage in Groups A & B was compared with the mean total score (TS) percentage in both groups, respectively, and with each other using Student’s t test.Results: The Anatomy score in Group A (63.72%±12.20) and Group B (66.26%±12.7) was less than the Total score (Group A:69.38%±8.79, Group B:67.56±10.93). This difference was statistically significant (p=0.00) in Group A. The Anatomy score in Group A was less than in Group B, but the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.08).Conclusion: The Anatomy score was significantly less than the Total score in exams with integrated results. Moreover, the Anatomy score was less in the exams with integrated results as compared to exams with subject-based Results.","PeriodicalId":15254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biology and Life Science","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biology and Life Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37185/lns.1.1.329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the study was to compare the Anatomy scores with Total scores in exams with Integrated results and exams with Subject-based results and to compare the Anatomy scores in exams with Integrated results with exams with Subject-based results.Study Design: Quantitative/observational, retrospective study, with Universal sampling.Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted in the Department of Anatomy of Foundation University School of Health Sciences Islamabad, Pakistan, from 1st May 2022 to 31st August 2022.Materials and Methods: The study was conducted on scores of the First professional examination in two groups of MBBS students; Group A (n=150). The result was based on integrated scores, and Group B (n=149): Result was based on subject score. The mean Anatomy score (AS) percentage in Groups A & B was compared with the mean total score (TS) percentage in both groups, respectively, and with each other using Student’s t test.Results: The Anatomy score in Group A (63.72%±12.20) and Group B (66.26%±12.7) was less than the Total score (Group A:69.38%±8.79, Group B:67.56±10.93). This difference was statistically significant (p=0.00) in Group A. The Anatomy score in Group A was less than in Group B, but the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.08).Conclusion: The Anatomy score was significantly less than the Total score in exams with integrated results. Moreover, the Anatomy score was less in the exams with integrated results as compared to exams with subject-based Results.
医学生在解剖学上的表现:综合分数与学科分数
目的:本研究的目的是比较解剖学考试成绩与总分与综合成绩和考试成绩与学科成绩的比较,比较解剖学考试成绩与综合成绩和考试成绩与学科成绩的比较。研究设计:定量/观察性,回顾性研究,通用抽样。研究地点和时间:研究于2022年5月1日至2022年8月31日在巴基斯坦伊斯兰堡基础大学健康科学学院解剖系进行。材料与方法:对两组MBBS学生的第一次专业考试成绩进行研究;A组,n=150。B组(n=149):以学科评分为准。采用Student’s t检验,分别比较A、B组的平均解剖评分(AS)百分比与两组的平均总分(TS)百分比,并相互比较。结果:A组解剖评分(63.72%±12.20)和B组解剖评分(66.26%±12.7)均小于Total评分(A组69.38%±8.79,B组67.56±10.93)。A组解剖评分低于B组,但差异无统计学意义(p=0.08)。结论:在综合成绩考试中,解剖学评分明显低于总分。此外,与基于科目的考试相比,解剖学在综合成绩考试中的得分更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信