Price Crises in Soviet Economy 1920s and Institutional Effects of the Fundamental Impossibility of Socialism

IF 0.5 Q4 ECONOMICS
A. Kavaliou
{"title":"Price Crises in Soviet Economy 1920s and Institutional Effects of the Fundamental Impossibility of Socialism","authors":"A. Kavaliou","doi":"10.17835/2076-6297.2021.13.2.068-081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the impact of institutional factors on the economic system of the Soviet Russia at the period of New Economic Policy. The first group of factors is associated with the social structure of the soviet village. The specifics of agricultural business activities (in particular, long production period, a gap in the movement of cash flows, impossibility of agricultural labors during the long winter season) led to the potential for localization of the village market in the event of an increase in prices for industrial products. This has repeatedly led to a crisis in the marketing of manufactured goods and food shortages in the cities. The second group of factors concerns institutional changes in ownership. The nationalization of the means of production led to the absence of a capital and labor market and to the impossibility of forming a system of relative prices, which, in a capitalist economy, signals entrepreneurs about the directions of efficient allocation of resources. The article demonstrates that Soviet economists in the 1920s used the same arguments in discussions about economic policy tools that market advocates used in discussion on economic calculation under socialism. The NEP as a system of a mixed economy was doomed due to the inability of the planning authorities to determine the directions of capital investments corresponding to the needs, which, given the relative isolation of the countryside, inevitably led to permanent crises.","PeriodicalId":43842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Institutional Studies","volume":"97 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Institutional Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2021.13.2.068-081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyzes the impact of institutional factors on the economic system of the Soviet Russia at the period of New Economic Policy. The first group of factors is associated with the social structure of the soviet village. The specifics of agricultural business activities (in particular, long production period, a gap in the movement of cash flows, impossibility of agricultural labors during the long winter season) led to the potential for localization of the village market in the event of an increase in prices for industrial products. This has repeatedly led to a crisis in the marketing of manufactured goods and food shortages in the cities. The second group of factors concerns institutional changes in ownership. The nationalization of the means of production led to the absence of a capital and labor market and to the impossibility of forming a system of relative prices, which, in a capitalist economy, signals entrepreneurs about the directions of efficient allocation of resources. The article demonstrates that Soviet economists in the 1920s used the same arguments in discussions about economic policy tools that market advocates used in discussion on economic calculation under socialism. The NEP as a system of a mixed economy was doomed due to the inability of the planning authorities to determine the directions of capital investments corresponding to the needs, which, given the relative isolation of the countryside, inevitably led to permanent crises.
1920年代苏联经济的价格危机与社会主义根本不可能的制度效应
文章分析了新经济政策时期制度因素对苏俄经济体制的影响。第一组因素与苏维埃农村的社会结构有关。农业经营活动的特殊性(特别是生产周期长、现金流流动存在缺口、在漫长的冬季不可能有农业劳动力)导致了在工业产品价格上涨的情况下农村市场本地化的潜力。这一再导致制成品销售危机和城市粮食短缺。第二组因素涉及所有权的制度变化。生产资料的国有化导致了资本和劳动力市场的缺失,也导致了相对价格体系的不可能形成,而相对价格体系在资本主义经济中是向企业家发出有效配置资源方向的信号。文章表明,20世纪20年代的苏联经济学家在讨论经济政策工具时使用的论点与市场鼓吹者在讨论社会主义下的经济计算时使用的论点相同。新经济政策作为一种混合经济制度注定要失败,因为计划当局无法根据需要确定资本投资的方向,鉴于农村的相对孤立,这不可避免地导致了永久性的危机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
24
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信