Long-Term Struggles for Land and Related Services: Egalitarian Local Authority in the Eastern Cape’s Border-Kei Region from the Mid-1980s to 2010.

IF 0.3 Q3 AREA STUDIES
L. Wotshela
{"title":"Long-Term Struggles for Land and Related Services: Egalitarian Local Authority in the Eastern Cape’s Border-Kei Region from the Mid-1980s to 2010.","authors":"L. Wotshela","doi":"10.1353/trn.2022.a905639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:For many within Bantustans during the epoch of late apartheid, the struggle for egalitarian local authority, and provision of services, innately linked to those for residential and other land needs. Such occurrences were particularly evident in the Ciskei, which largely emerged as a receptacle for countless relocated African families, and whose land and amenities was controlled, and then dispensed through state-created tribal authorities. Those contrived power brokers served at the base of government hierarchy but were equally influential in linking services to loyalists of the Bantustan system whilst fostering its social and political patronage networks. Naturally, the system impelled reaction and contestation in the form of robust civic movements from those the Bantustan policy sought to incorporate by early 1980s. Equally, such civic movements widened by the late 1980s to include even those already within the Ciskei Bantustan, but initially alienated from land and services allotted by tribal authorities. By then this movement had become key to rural and urban representative voices and was no longer restricted to the Ciskei. It marked a Border-Kei region of the current Eastern Cape Province, which from the early 1990s coalesced around the Ciskei, the western parts of the Transkei and the enfolded former white farming districts with their towns. How then did the calibrated local authority system after 1994 typify various formations of this area against persistent land demands and services, as well as reorganising chiefly authorities (now referred to as traditional authority)? To what extent did governance and distribution of services continue being routed for benefaction? This paper provides an historical outline of the campaign for egalitarian local authority, and ultimately shows the early complexities of an integrated municipality in 2000 in that hitherto segregated Border-Kei region of South Africa’s Eastern Cape.","PeriodicalId":45045,"journal":{"name":"Transformation-Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transformation-Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/trn.2022.a905639","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT:For many within Bantustans during the epoch of late apartheid, the struggle for egalitarian local authority, and provision of services, innately linked to those for residential and other land needs. Such occurrences were particularly evident in the Ciskei, which largely emerged as a receptacle for countless relocated African families, and whose land and amenities was controlled, and then dispensed through state-created tribal authorities. Those contrived power brokers served at the base of government hierarchy but were equally influential in linking services to loyalists of the Bantustan system whilst fostering its social and political patronage networks. Naturally, the system impelled reaction and contestation in the form of robust civic movements from those the Bantustan policy sought to incorporate by early 1980s. Equally, such civic movements widened by the late 1980s to include even those already within the Ciskei Bantustan, but initially alienated from land and services allotted by tribal authorities. By then this movement had become key to rural and urban representative voices and was no longer restricted to the Ciskei. It marked a Border-Kei region of the current Eastern Cape Province, which from the early 1990s coalesced around the Ciskei, the western parts of the Transkei and the enfolded former white farming districts with their towns. How then did the calibrated local authority system after 1994 typify various formations of this area against persistent land demands and services, as well as reorganising chiefly authorities (now referred to as traditional authority)? To what extent did governance and distribution of services continue being routed for benefaction? This paper provides an historical outline of the campaign for egalitarian local authority, and ultimately shows the early complexities of an integrated municipality in 2000 in that hitherto segregated Border-Kei region of South Africa’s Eastern Cape.
土地和相关服务的长期斗争:20世纪80年代中期至2010年东开普省边界-基地区的平等主义地方当局。
摘要:在种族隔离后期,班图斯坦人为争取平等的地方权力和提供服务而进行的斗争,与住宅和其他土地需求息息相关。这种情况在西斯凯地区尤为明显,它主要是作为无数重新安置的非洲家庭的避难所出现的,其土地和设施受到控制,然后通过国家建立的部落当局进行分配。这些人为的权力经纪人服务于政府等级制度的基础,但在将服务与班图斯坦体系的忠诚者联系起来,同时培育其社会和政治庇护网络方面,同样具有影响力。自然,这一制度促使班图斯坦政策试图在20世纪80年代早期纳入的那些人以强大的公民运动的形式作出反应和争论。同样,到20世纪80年代末,这种公民运动扩大到甚至包括那些已经在西斯凯班图斯坦境内的人,但最初与部落当局分配的土地和服务疏远。到那时,这一运动已成为农村和城市代表性声音的关键,不再局限于西斯凯。它标志着现在东开普省的一个边界-基地区,从20世纪90年代初开始,该地区围绕着西斯凯、特兰斯凯的西部地区和被包围的前白人农业区及其城镇。那么,在1994年之后,经过校准的地方当局系统是如何针对持续的土地需求和服务,以及重组主要当局(现在被称为传统当局),将该地区的各种形式具体化的?服务的治理和分配在多大程度上继续为受益而路由?本文提供了平等主义地方当局运动的历史概况,并最终展示了2000年在南非东开普省迄今隔离的边界-基地区建立一个综合城市的早期复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信