Ahmad Khan, Anam Khan, M. Rehman, Sumaya Hanif, N. Sahi, Maria Zafar, Jallat Khan, F. Saleem
{"title":"Follow Up Evaluation of Pediatric Epileptic Patients: A Prospective Clinical Study","authors":"Ahmad Khan, Anam Khan, M. Rehman, Sumaya Hanif, N. Sahi, Maria Zafar, Jallat Khan, F. Saleem","doi":"10.25258/IJPCR.V9I7.8789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To investigate the follow up evaluation of pediatric epileptic patients and to determine the problems in epilepsy\ntreatment that need improvement. Methods: This prospective study was conducted in the Neurology Department at\nChildren Hospital Lahore. A Pharmaceutical Care Plan was developed which included Subjective information, Objective\ninformation, Assessment and Plan of the condition of patient followed by definitive plan for assessment of adverse drug\nreactions, drug-drug interactions and pharmacoecnomics. 100 patients having age ≤ 15 years with uncomplicated epileptic\nseizures were followed for seven months. Data was analyzed by routine statistical methods. Results: Commonly\nencountered cases were tonic clonic 39%, myoclonic 12%, petitmal 11% and complex partial seizures 9%. Results show\nthat most commonly prescribed drug was Valproic acid used in 67% cases. Patients stable on monotherapy were 57 %.\nPatients with appropriate dose were 89%. Generic prescribing was done in 10% cases. Patient who received antibiotics and\nmultivitamins were 19% and 21% respectively. Adverse drug reactions were observed in 13% cases. The patients with\npoor education, medium education and good education were 7.9, 63 and 28.6 percent respectively. Compliance was\nsatisfactory in 72% patients. Patients with well-controlled fits were 25%. Mean cost of treatment for one month at start and\nend study was Rs. 576 ± Rs. 345 and Rs. 716 ± Rs. 422 respectively. Various wrong views about epilepsy are common in\nour society like patients who consider it due to evil spirits were 36%, and 24% of these patients in the start of disease\nstrictly take a treatment from faith holders for the cure of disease. Conclusion: There is a great need for the education of\nour society about epilepsy and its proper treatment. The discrepancies observed in the treatment of epilepsy were due to\nabsence of pharmacist in our health care system. If pharmacist checks all the prescriptions, maintains pharmaceutical care\nplan of all the patients under SOAP format and implements guidelines of Standard Pharmaceutical Care Plan, the quality\nof life of epileptic patients can be improved. Likewise, cost of the treatment can be reduced.","PeriodicalId":19889,"journal":{"name":"药学与临床研究","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"药学与临床研究","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25258/IJPCR.V9I7.8789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the follow up evaluation of pediatric epileptic patients and to determine the problems in epilepsy
treatment that need improvement. Methods: This prospective study was conducted in the Neurology Department at
Children Hospital Lahore. A Pharmaceutical Care Plan was developed which included Subjective information, Objective
information, Assessment and Plan of the condition of patient followed by definitive plan for assessment of adverse drug
reactions, drug-drug interactions and pharmacoecnomics. 100 patients having age ≤ 15 years with uncomplicated epileptic
seizures were followed for seven months. Data was analyzed by routine statistical methods. Results: Commonly
encountered cases were tonic clonic 39%, myoclonic 12%, petitmal 11% and complex partial seizures 9%. Results show
that most commonly prescribed drug was Valproic acid used in 67% cases. Patients stable on monotherapy were 57 %.
Patients with appropriate dose were 89%. Generic prescribing was done in 10% cases. Patient who received antibiotics and
multivitamins were 19% and 21% respectively. Adverse drug reactions were observed in 13% cases. The patients with
poor education, medium education and good education were 7.9, 63 and 28.6 percent respectively. Compliance was
satisfactory in 72% patients. Patients with well-controlled fits were 25%. Mean cost of treatment for one month at start and
end study was Rs. 576 ± Rs. 345 and Rs. 716 ± Rs. 422 respectively. Various wrong views about epilepsy are common in
our society like patients who consider it due to evil spirits were 36%, and 24% of these patients in the start of disease
strictly take a treatment from faith holders for the cure of disease. Conclusion: There is a great need for the education of
our society about epilepsy and its proper treatment. The discrepancies observed in the treatment of epilepsy were due to
absence of pharmacist in our health care system. If pharmacist checks all the prescriptions, maintains pharmaceutical care
plan of all the patients under SOAP format and implements guidelines of Standard Pharmaceutical Care Plan, the quality
of life of epileptic patients can be improved. Likewise, cost of the treatment can be reduced.