Sentinel Node Evaluation in Prostate Cancer

Willem Meinhardt
{"title":"Sentinel Node Evaluation in Prostate Cancer","authors":"Willem Meinhardt","doi":"10.1016/j.eeus.2007.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Provide an overview of the use of the sentinel node<span> (SN) technique in prostate carcinoma. The relevance of nodal staging in the several stages of prostate carcinoma, technical aspects of the SN technique, indications, and lessons learned from it are discussed.</span></p></div><div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The lymph node status is relevant in all M0 tumour stages. In early prostate cancer<span> the changes of nodal involvement are so low that invasive diagnostics<span> are superfluous. However, the definition of this early stage is narrowing since the results of extensive node dissection have shown that previously assumed low-risk patients may harbour positive lymph nodes. On the other hand, in locally advanced cases, if the decision for external-beam radiation on the lymph node basins in combination with radiation of the prostate and 3 yr of hormonal therapy has been made, a lymph node dissection seems superfluous.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>SN dissection may be performed in open surgery or as a laparoscopic technique. A radioactive tracer is injected into the prostate and on γ-camera imaging it is decided which lymph nodes are the possible first landing zones for the </span>prostate tumour. During the radioguided surgery, the excision of the SNs, a handheld γ probe is used to identify the radioactive nodes. On introducing the method in a clinic, it is important to do a conformal extensive pelvic lymph node dissection as well to ensure that logistics and the performance are reliable.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>SN dissection is as reliable as a diagnostic tool as extended pelvic lymph node dissection. Because it may show cancer-bearing nodes outside of the region of the extended lymph node dissection, such as the presacral area, it may on occasion be even more sensitive.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The SN technique is likely to have fewer complications compared to the extended lymph node dissection. On the other hand, an extended lymph node dissection may still be indicated when the SN procedure yields only a few positive lymph nodes and definite cure is still the aim. Weighing the advantages and disadvantages of the laparoscopic versus the open SN technique is not different than in any other procedure. In the near future, sophisticated imaging techniques<span> will identify nodes that are suspicious for micrometastases. This will make minimal invasive methods to confirm the nodal status not superfluous, but more in demand.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>When the nodal stage is important for treatment decisions, only extended dissections or the SN method will provide accurate staging. The SN procedure is less invasive and will avoid an extensive node dissection in the majority of cases.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100386,"journal":{"name":"EAU-EBU Update Series","volume":"5 6","pages":"Pages 223-231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.eeus.2007.07.003","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EAU-EBU Update Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871259207000494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Objectives

Provide an overview of the use of the sentinel node (SN) technique in prostate carcinoma. The relevance of nodal staging in the several stages of prostate carcinoma, technical aspects of the SN technique, indications, and lessons learned from it are discussed.

Introduction

The lymph node status is relevant in all M0 tumour stages. In early prostate cancer the changes of nodal involvement are so low that invasive diagnostics are superfluous. However, the definition of this early stage is narrowing since the results of extensive node dissection have shown that previously assumed low-risk patients may harbour positive lymph nodes. On the other hand, in locally advanced cases, if the decision for external-beam radiation on the lymph node basins in combination with radiation of the prostate and 3 yr of hormonal therapy has been made, a lymph node dissection seems superfluous.

Methods

SN dissection may be performed in open surgery or as a laparoscopic technique. A radioactive tracer is injected into the prostate and on γ-camera imaging it is decided which lymph nodes are the possible first landing zones for the prostate tumour. During the radioguided surgery, the excision of the SNs, a handheld γ probe is used to identify the radioactive nodes. On introducing the method in a clinic, it is important to do a conformal extensive pelvic lymph node dissection as well to ensure that logistics and the performance are reliable.

Results

SN dissection is as reliable as a diagnostic tool as extended pelvic lymph node dissection. Because it may show cancer-bearing nodes outside of the region of the extended lymph node dissection, such as the presacral area, it may on occasion be even more sensitive.

Discussion

The SN technique is likely to have fewer complications compared to the extended lymph node dissection. On the other hand, an extended lymph node dissection may still be indicated when the SN procedure yields only a few positive lymph nodes and definite cure is still the aim. Weighing the advantages and disadvantages of the laparoscopic versus the open SN technique is not different than in any other procedure. In the near future, sophisticated imaging techniques will identify nodes that are suspicious for micrometastases. This will make minimal invasive methods to confirm the nodal status not superfluous, but more in demand.

Conclusion

When the nodal stage is important for treatment decisions, only extended dissections or the SN method will provide accurate staging. The SN procedure is less invasive and will avoid an extensive node dissection in the majority of cases.

前列腺癌前哨淋巴结评估
目的综述前哨淋巴结(SN)技术在前列腺癌中的应用。淋巴结分期在前列腺癌的几个阶段的相关性,SN技术的技术方面,适应症,并从中吸取教训进行了讨论。淋巴结状态与所有M0肿瘤分期相关。在早期前列腺癌中,淋巴结受累的变化非常低,因此侵入性诊断是多余的。然而,由于广泛淋巴结清扫的结果表明,先前假定的低风险患者可能含有阳性淋巴结,因此早期阶段的定义正在缩小。另一方面,在局部晚期病例中,如果决定在淋巴结盆地上进行外束放射治疗,结合前列腺放射治疗和3年的激素治疗,淋巴结清扫似乎是多余的。方法胸膜剥离可在开放手术中进行,也可在腹腔镜下进行。将放射性示踪剂注射到前列腺中,然后通过γ-照相机成像来确定哪些淋巴结可能是前列腺肿瘤的第一个着落区。在放射引导手术中,切除SNs,手持式γ探针用于识别放射性淋巴结。在将该方法引入临床时,重要的是要做一个适形的广泛骨盆淋巴结清扫,以确保后勤和性能是可靠的。结果盆腔淋巴结清扫与盆腔淋巴结清扫一样可靠。因为它可能显示出延伸淋巴结清扫区域以外的癌性淋巴结,如骶前区,所以有时它可能更加敏感。讨论与淋巴结清扫术相比,淋巴结清扫术的并发症更少。另一方面,当SN手术只产生少数阳性淋巴结,明确治愈仍然是目的时,可能仍然需要扩大淋巴结清扫。权衡腹腔镜与开放式SN技术的优缺点与任何其他程序没有什么不同。在不久的将来,复杂的成像技术将识别出可疑的微转移淋巴结。这将使确认淋巴结状态的微创方法不是多余的,而是更需要的。结论当淋巴结分期对治疗决策很重要时,只有扩大解剖或SN法才能提供准确的分期。在大多数情况下,SN手术的侵入性较小,可以避免广泛的淋巴结清扫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信