Defining Postsecondary Degrees in the 21st Century.

K. Goldberg, James E. Guffey, Ponzio Oliverio
{"title":"Defining Postsecondary Degrees in the 21st Century.","authors":"K. Goldberg, James E. Guffey, Ponzio Oliverio","doi":"10.19030/tlc.v13i2.9637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The competition for jobs in the 21 st century is increasingly being driven by defining postsecondary learning in light of new and complex environments. To succeed, students must be prepared with knowledge to compete in these environments. Historically, higher education has defined these requirements in their own terms, often through learning outcomes specific to a course, degree or discipline. Given the recent attention toward the accountability of postsecondary education in the United States, a challenge facing our colleges and universities is defining the learning in a common language that is transparent and easily understood by all stakeholders regardless of a degree. The Lumina Foundation’s (2011) Degree Qualification Profile (DQP) is one way to accomplish this through five learning areas. This article will discuss how one institution adopted the DQP in the School of Professional Studies and quantified the five learning areas and meaning of its degrees. This study will discuss how three programs (undergraduate and graduate) identified and categorized the five learning areas of the DQP in the degrees, quantified the results, and used them in the assessment process for continuous improvement.","PeriodicalId":89968,"journal":{"name":"Journal of college teaching and learning","volume":"70 1","pages":"65-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of college teaching and learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v13i2.9637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The competition for jobs in the 21 st century is increasingly being driven by defining postsecondary learning in light of new and complex environments. To succeed, students must be prepared with knowledge to compete in these environments. Historically, higher education has defined these requirements in their own terms, often through learning outcomes specific to a course, degree or discipline. Given the recent attention toward the accountability of postsecondary education in the United States, a challenge facing our colleges and universities is defining the learning in a common language that is transparent and easily understood by all stakeholders regardless of a degree. The Lumina Foundation’s (2011) Degree Qualification Profile (DQP) is one way to accomplish this through five learning areas. This article will discuss how one institution adopted the DQP in the School of Professional Studies and quantified the five learning areas and meaning of its degrees. This study will discuss how three programs (undergraduate and graduate) identified and categorized the five learning areas of the DQP in the degrees, quantified the results, and used them in the assessment process for continuous improvement.
定义21世纪的高等教育学位。
21世纪的就业竞争越来越多地取决于根据新的和复杂的环境来定义高等教育。为了取得成功,学生们必须准备好在这些环境中竞争的知识。从历史上看,高等教育以自己的方式定义了这些要求,通常是通过特定于课程、学位或学科的学习成果来定义的。鉴于最近对美国高等教育问责制的关注,我们的学院和大学面临的一个挑战是用一种透明的、容易被所有利益相关者理解的共同语言来定义学习,而不管他们的学位如何。Lumina基金会(2011)的学位资格概况(DQP)是通过五个学习领域实现这一目标的一种方法。本文将讨论一所大学如何在专业研究学院采用DQP,并量化其学位的五个学习领域和意义。本研究将讨论三个项目(本科和研究生)如何在学位中识别和分类DQP的五个学习领域,量化结果,并在评估过程中使用它们以进行持续改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书