EARLY COPPER USE IN NEOLITHIC NORTH- EASTERN EUROPE: AN OVERVIEW

Pub Date : 2012-06-01 DOI:10.3176/ARCH.2012.1.01
K. Nordqvist, Vesa-Pekka Herva, Janne P. Ikäheimo, Antti Lahelma
{"title":"EARLY COPPER USE IN NEOLITHIC NORTH- EASTERN EUROPE: AN OVERVIEW","authors":"K. Nordqvist, Vesa-Pekka Herva, Janne P. Ikäheimo, Antti Lahelma","doi":"10.3176/ARCH.2012.1.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Copper was known and used in different parts of Eurasia several millennia before the beginning of the Bronze Age. The earliest evidence derives from the Near East and Anatolia, where copper was first used between the 11th and 7th millennia BC, whereas copper use in Europe, specifically in the Balkans and the South-East, began by the mid-6th millennium BC (Roberts et al. 2009, 1013). Copper use spread from south-eastern Europe to the steppes of southern Russia (Chernykh 1992, 41 f.) and was introduced farther to the forested regions of East European (or Russian) Plain along the rivers Volga and Kama in the 4th millennium BC (Krajnov 1987, 14 f.; Nagovitsyn 1987, 32). The use of copper was introduced in central, western and northern Europe through different processes at different times (Roberts et al. 2009, 1015 f.); copper smelting was known in the eastern Alps in the 5th millennium BC (Hoppner et al. 2005), at a time when large-scale metal production in the Balkans had begun (Bailey 2000, 209), whereas signs of metal use are few in north-western Europe before 2500 BC (Roberts 2009, 467). In north-eastern Europe the use of native copper began soon after 4000 BC in what is today the Republic of Karelia (Russian Federation), when copper artefacts appear in find assemblages. While a number of early copper finds are also known from central and northern parts of Finland, they are very rare on the Scandinavian Peninsula and in the Baltic countries. The early appearance of copper in eastern Fennoscandia is common knowledge among Russian and Finnish archaeologists, but the general picture of this early copper use is patchy and its wider context elusive, which has to do with the limited research material, different academic traditions as well as linguistic and national boundaries. As the relevant publications are mainly in Russian and Finnish, the early copper finds from northeastern Europe have often been omitted from the surveys and studies on the beginning of metal use in Europe. Even the early metal finds have been subject to some research and scientific analyses in Russia and Finland, very little has been said about why copper was adopted and how early copper use relates to broader cultural developments. This paper provides an overview and discussion of the early copper finds and metal use in north-eastern Europe. More specifically, the geographical research area stretches from the shores of Lake Onega in the east to the Baltic Sea in the west and from the Baltic countries in the south to the Arctic Ocean in the north (Fig. 1). Early metal use in this region is put in a broader context, with a special reference to the northern European Russia. The period of interest here is 4000-2000 BC (all dates are given in calibrated radiocarbon years, i.e. calBC). A large part of this time frame is commonly referred to as the Eneolithic in Russia but is called the (Sub-)Neolithic in Finland (Fig. 2). In this paper the term Neolithic is preferred, although we acknowledge that it contradicts especially the Russian periodisation. Without going deeper into the reasoning behind the definitions it suffices to say that recent research (e.g. Vaneeckhout 2009; Mokkonen 2011; Herva et al. n.d.) has increasingly indicated that the cultures in the research area between 4000-2000 BC can be described as Neolithic in a more real sense that has been traditionally thought. It is against this 'Neolithic proper' background the early copper use in the north must be considered. [FIGURE 1 OMITTED] [FIGURE 2 OMITTED] Cultural context and dating of early copper use in Karelia and Finland Before turning to a closer examination of the copper finds, it is necessary to provide a general outline of the cultural phases and development in the research area in 4000-2000 BC. Ceramic chronology is of special interest here, although the absolute dating of pottery types is far from complete. Nevertheless, the relative chronology based on pottery provides the only available framework for dating copper finds from particular sites--a detailed discussion on this topic will be provided in another article (Nordqvist et al. …","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3176/ARCH.2012.1.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Introduction Copper was known and used in different parts of Eurasia several millennia before the beginning of the Bronze Age. The earliest evidence derives from the Near East and Anatolia, where copper was first used between the 11th and 7th millennia BC, whereas copper use in Europe, specifically in the Balkans and the South-East, began by the mid-6th millennium BC (Roberts et al. 2009, 1013). Copper use spread from south-eastern Europe to the steppes of southern Russia (Chernykh 1992, 41 f.) and was introduced farther to the forested regions of East European (or Russian) Plain along the rivers Volga and Kama in the 4th millennium BC (Krajnov 1987, 14 f.; Nagovitsyn 1987, 32). The use of copper was introduced in central, western and northern Europe through different processes at different times (Roberts et al. 2009, 1015 f.); copper smelting was known in the eastern Alps in the 5th millennium BC (Hoppner et al. 2005), at a time when large-scale metal production in the Balkans had begun (Bailey 2000, 209), whereas signs of metal use are few in north-western Europe before 2500 BC (Roberts 2009, 467). In north-eastern Europe the use of native copper began soon after 4000 BC in what is today the Republic of Karelia (Russian Federation), when copper artefacts appear in find assemblages. While a number of early copper finds are also known from central and northern parts of Finland, they are very rare on the Scandinavian Peninsula and in the Baltic countries. The early appearance of copper in eastern Fennoscandia is common knowledge among Russian and Finnish archaeologists, but the general picture of this early copper use is patchy and its wider context elusive, which has to do with the limited research material, different academic traditions as well as linguistic and national boundaries. As the relevant publications are mainly in Russian and Finnish, the early copper finds from northeastern Europe have often been omitted from the surveys and studies on the beginning of metal use in Europe. Even the early metal finds have been subject to some research and scientific analyses in Russia and Finland, very little has been said about why copper was adopted and how early copper use relates to broader cultural developments. This paper provides an overview and discussion of the early copper finds and metal use in north-eastern Europe. More specifically, the geographical research area stretches from the shores of Lake Onega in the east to the Baltic Sea in the west and from the Baltic countries in the south to the Arctic Ocean in the north (Fig. 1). Early metal use in this region is put in a broader context, with a special reference to the northern European Russia. The period of interest here is 4000-2000 BC (all dates are given in calibrated radiocarbon years, i.e. calBC). A large part of this time frame is commonly referred to as the Eneolithic in Russia but is called the (Sub-)Neolithic in Finland (Fig. 2). In this paper the term Neolithic is preferred, although we acknowledge that it contradicts especially the Russian periodisation. Without going deeper into the reasoning behind the definitions it suffices to say that recent research (e.g. Vaneeckhout 2009; Mokkonen 2011; Herva et al. n.d.) has increasingly indicated that the cultures in the research area between 4000-2000 BC can be described as Neolithic in a more real sense that has been traditionally thought. It is against this 'Neolithic proper' background the early copper use in the north must be considered. [FIGURE 1 OMITTED] [FIGURE 2 OMITTED] Cultural context and dating of early copper use in Karelia and Finland Before turning to a closer examination of the copper finds, it is necessary to provide a general outline of the cultural phases and development in the research area in 4000-2000 BC. Ceramic chronology is of special interest here, although the absolute dating of pottery types is far from complete. Nevertheless, the relative chronology based on pottery provides the only available framework for dating copper finds from particular sites--a detailed discussion on this topic will be provided in another article (Nordqvist et al. …
分享
查看原文
新石器时代东北欧早期铜的使用:概述
铜在青铜时代开始前几千年就在欧亚大陆的不同地区被发现和使用。最早的证据来自近东和安纳托利亚,在那里铜在公元前11至7千年之间首次被使用,而在欧洲,特别是在巴尔干和东南部,铜的使用始于公元前6千年中期(Roberts et al. 2009, 1013)。铜的使用从东南欧传播到俄罗斯南部的大草原(Chernykh 1992, 41 f.),并在公元前4000年沿着伏尔加河和卡马河被进一步引入东欧(或俄罗斯)平原的森林地区(Krajnov 1987, 14 f.);Nagovitsyn 1987, 32)。在中欧、西欧和北欧,铜的使用是在不同时期通过不同的工艺引入的(Roberts et al. 2009, 1015 f.);公元前5000年,东阿尔卑斯地区就已经知道了铜冶炼(Hoppner etal . 2005),当时巴尔干地区已经开始大规模生产金属(Bailey 2000, 209),而西北欧在公元前2500年之前很少有使用金属的迹象(Roberts 2009, 467)。在欧洲东北部,公元前4000年后不久,在今天的卡累利阿共和国(俄罗斯联邦),当铜制品出现在发现组合中时,就开始使用天然铜。虽然在芬兰中部和北部也发现了一些早期的铜矿,但在斯堪的纳维亚半岛和波罗的海国家却非常罕见。在俄罗斯和芬兰的考古学家中,芬诺斯坎迪亚东部早期出现铜是众所周知的,但关于早期使用铜的总体情况是不完整的,其更广泛的背景是难以理解的,这与有限的研究材料、不同的学术传统以及语言和国家边界有关。由于相关出版物以俄文和芬兰文为主,在对欧洲金属使用开端的调查和研究中,往往忽略了东北欧早期铜的发现。在俄罗斯和芬兰,即使是早期的金属发现也受到了一些研究和科学分析的影响,但关于为什么采用铜以及早期铜的使用与更广泛的文化发展之间的关系,却很少有人说。本文对东北欧早期铜的发现和金属利用进行了综述和讨论。更具体地说,地理研究区域从东部的奥涅加湖沿岸延伸到西部的波罗的海,从南部的波罗的海国家延伸到北部的北冰洋(图1)。该地区早期的金属使用被置于更广泛的背景下,特别提到了北欧的俄罗斯。这里感兴趣的时期是公元前4000-2000年(所有日期都以校准的放射性碳年给出,即calBC)。这个时间框架的很大一部分在俄罗斯通常被称为新石器时代,但在芬兰被称为(亚)新石器时代(图2)。在本文中,新石器时代一词更受欢迎,尽管我们承认它与俄罗斯的分期相矛盾。无需深入研究这些定义背后的原因,就足以说明最近的研究(例如Vaneeckhout 2009;Mokkonen 2011;Herva et al. n.d.)越来越多地表明,研究区域内公元前4000-2000年之间的文化可以被描述为传统上认为的更真实意义上的新石器时代。在这种“新石器时代”的背景下,必须考虑北方早期铜的使用。【图1省略】【图2省略】卡累利阿和芬兰早期铜使用的文化背景和年代在对铜的发现进行更深入的研究之前,有必要对研究区域在公元前4000-2000年的文化阶段和发展进行总体概述。陶瓷年代学是这里特别感兴趣的,尽管陶器类型的绝对年代远未完成。然而,基于陶器的相对年代学为特定地点的铜发现提供了唯一可用的框架——关于这个主题的详细讨论将在另一篇文章中提供(Nordqvist et al. . ...)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信