COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Zambia: A Qualitative Study among Pharmacy Students at the University of Zambia

S. Mudenda
{"title":"COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Zambia: A Qualitative Study among Pharmacy Students at the University of Zambia","authors":"S. Mudenda","doi":"10.36347/sajp.2022.v11i11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines were introduced to contain the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. However, there have been challenges regarding the acceptance and uptake of these vaccines in Zambia. The study aimed to explore the factors that contribute to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among pharmacy students in Zambia. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study that employed qualitative methods using a phenomenological approach. The study was conducted among 20 undergraduate pharmacy students schooling at the University of Zambia. The interviews were recorded in a semi-structured questionnaire and responses were analysed using Colaizzi's seven-step analysis method. The analysis was based on factors that influence COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and the student's thoughts about the vaccines. The responses were divided into five themes: fear of potential adverse effects, the ineffectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines, fear of being used as experiments, preventive measures better than COVID-19 vaccines and the need for better education on the benefits and adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines. Results: The findings indicate increased hesitancy against COVID-19 vaccines among pharmacy students in Zambia. Most participants were hesitant to receive the vaccine due to fear of experiencing adverse effects. Besides, there was also a concern about vaccine effectiveness in protecting individuals against COVID-19. Further, the students felt that the COVID-19 vaccines did not pass through all the necessary stages of vaccine development due to the short period they were introduced. Furthermore, the participants had fear of being used in experiments such as clinical trials. The students felt that adhering to the recommended COVID-19 prevention measures was better than being vaccinated. Conclusion: The hesitance against COVID-19 vaccines among pharmacy students was a result of many factors. The concern regarding potential adverse effects and effectiveness of ...","PeriodicalId":21439,"journal":{"name":"Scholars Academic Journal of Pharmacy","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scholars Academic Journal of Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36347/sajp.2022.v11i11.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines were introduced to contain the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. However, there have been challenges regarding the acceptance and uptake of these vaccines in Zambia. The study aimed to explore the factors that contribute to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among pharmacy students in Zambia. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study that employed qualitative methods using a phenomenological approach. The study was conducted among 20 undergraduate pharmacy students schooling at the University of Zambia. The interviews were recorded in a semi-structured questionnaire and responses were analysed using Colaizzi's seven-step analysis method. The analysis was based on factors that influence COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and the student's thoughts about the vaccines. The responses were divided into five themes: fear of potential adverse effects, the ineffectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines, fear of being used as experiments, preventive measures better than COVID-19 vaccines and the need for better education on the benefits and adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines. Results: The findings indicate increased hesitancy against COVID-19 vaccines among pharmacy students in Zambia. Most participants were hesitant to receive the vaccine due to fear of experiencing adverse effects. Besides, there was also a concern about vaccine effectiveness in protecting individuals against COVID-19. Further, the students felt that the COVID-19 vaccines did not pass through all the necessary stages of vaccine development due to the short period they were introduced. Furthermore, the participants had fear of being used in experiments such as clinical trials. The students felt that adhering to the recommended COVID-19 prevention measures was better than being vaccinated. Conclusion: The hesitance against COVID-19 vaccines among pharmacy students was a result of many factors. The concern regarding potential adverse effects and effectiveness of ...
赞比亚COVID-19疫苗犹豫:赞比亚大学药学学生的定性研究
背景:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫苗的引入是为了遏制正在进行的COVID-19大流行。然而,在赞比亚接受和接受这些疫苗方面存在挑战。该研究旨在探讨导致赞比亚药学专业学生对COVID-19疫苗犹豫不决的因素。材料和方法:这是一项采用现象学方法的定性方法的横断面研究。该研究在赞比亚大学药学专业的20名本科生中进行。访谈记录在半结构化问卷中,并使用Colaizzi的七步分析法分析回答。该分析基于影响COVID-19疫苗犹豫的因素和学生对疫苗的想法。回答分为五个主题:对潜在不良反应的恐惧、COVID-19疫苗的无效性、对被用作实验的恐惧、比COVID-19疫苗更好的预防措施以及对COVID-19疫苗的益处和不良反应进行更好教育的必要性。结果:研究结果表明,赞比亚药学专业学生对COVID-19疫苗的犹豫态度有所增加。由于担心出现不良反应,大多数参与者对接种疫苗犹豫不决。此外,人们还担心疫苗在保护个人免受COVID-19感染方面的有效性。此外,学生们认为新冠病毒疫苗由于引进时间较短,没有通过疫苗开发的所有必要阶段。此外,参与者害怕被用于临床试验等实验。学生们认为,坚持推荐的新冠肺炎预防措施比接种疫苗更好。结论:药学专业学生对新冠肺炎疫苗的犹豫是多种因素共同作用的结果。对……的潜在副作用和有效性的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信