Jing Sun, Shaohua He, P. Lin, Ping Li, Xiaomin Cai, Lele Li, J. Qian, Chong Liu, Xiao Li, Yi-qian Liu, O. Røe, Y. Shu, Yanhong Gu, Xiaofeng Chen
{"title":"Adjuvant Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin vs. Capecitabine and Paclitaxel in Gastric Cancer Patients after D2 Gastrectomy","authors":"Jing Sun, Shaohua He, P. Lin, Ping Li, Xiaomin Cai, Lele Li, J. Qian, Chong Liu, Xiao Li, Yi-qian Liu, O. Røe, Y. Shu, Yanhong Gu, Xiaofeng Chen","doi":"10.4172/2157-2518.1000306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This retrospective study was carried out to compare the safety and efficacy of adjuvant capecitabine/ \n oxaliplatin (XELOX) versus capecitabine/paclitaxel (XP) in gastric cancer patients after D2 gastrectomy. \nMethods: The hospital records of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from 2008-2012 were \n searched to identify patients treated with adjuvant XELOX or XP after D2 gastrectomy and their clinicopathological \n data were retrieved. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method \n with log-rank test. \nResults: A total of 144 stage I-III patients who received adjuvant XELOX (n=89) or XP (n=55) after D2 \n gastrectomy were identified. The median follow-up time was 47.0 (25.0-80.0) months. The 3-year DFS and OS rate \n was 67.0% versus 50.8% (p=0.047) and 74.8% versus 63.5% (p=0.184) in the XELOX and XP group respectively. \n XELOX significantly reduced the risk of relapse at three years (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.36-0.99) but did not reduced the \n risk of death at the third year (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.36-1.22) compared with that treated with XP. \nConclusions: These results indicate that adjuvant XELOX after D2 gastrectomy has a clinical advantage over \n XP; however, prospective studies are needed to verify this finding.","PeriodicalId":15209,"journal":{"name":"Journal of carcinogenesis & mutagenesis","volume":"126 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of carcinogenesis & mutagenesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-2518.1000306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This retrospective study was carried out to compare the safety and efficacy of adjuvant capecitabine/
oxaliplatin (XELOX) versus capecitabine/paclitaxel (XP) in gastric cancer patients after D2 gastrectomy.
Methods: The hospital records of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from 2008-2012 were
searched to identify patients treated with adjuvant XELOX or XP after D2 gastrectomy and their clinicopathological
data were retrieved. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method
with log-rank test.
Results: A total of 144 stage I-III patients who received adjuvant XELOX (n=89) or XP (n=55) after D2
gastrectomy were identified. The median follow-up time was 47.0 (25.0-80.0) months. The 3-year DFS and OS rate
was 67.0% versus 50.8% (p=0.047) and 74.8% versus 63.5% (p=0.184) in the XELOX and XP group respectively.
XELOX significantly reduced the risk of relapse at three years (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.36-0.99) but did not reduced the
risk of death at the third year (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.36-1.22) compared with that treated with XP.
Conclusions: These results indicate that adjuvant XELOX after D2 gastrectomy has a clinical advantage over
XP; however, prospective studies are needed to verify this finding.