Efficacy Of Levetiracetam Versus Phenytoin As A Second-Line Antiepileptic Drug In The Management Of Benzodiazepine-Refractory Status Epilepticus Among Children.

Babar Naeem, Mommna Ashfaq, Mamoon Akbar Qureshi
{"title":"Efficacy Of Levetiracetam Versus Phenytoin As A Second-Line Antiepileptic Drug In The Management Of Benzodiazepine-Refractory Status Epilepticus Among Children.","authors":"Babar Naeem, Mommna Ashfaq, Mamoon Akbar Qureshi","doi":"10.55519/JAMC-03-11897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Status Epilepticus (SE) is a life-threatening neurological emergency requiring appropriate therapy to terminate seizure activity. SE is managed with supportive measures and ultra-short-acting benzodiazepines. However, limited data is available in the paediatric population regarding the next best option when this fails. This study aimed at finding new data to recommend levetiracetam or phenytoin as the second-line option.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and thirty-seven patients with status epilepticus were randomized into two groups; group-I was given IV Levetiracetam (LEV) at 20 mg/kg/dose over 5 minutes followed by a maintenance dose of 20mg/kg/dose BID, whereas Group II received phenytoin at 20mg/kg IV loading dose followed by a maintenance dose of 5-8 mg/kg/day divided BID. The primary outcome was seizure cessation, defined as the termination of the apparent convulsion 30 min after the administration of phenytoin or levetiracetam. Secondary outcomes were the use of different anti-convulsants for continued management, admittance to critical treatment, and severe adverse events (including mortality, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, rash, airway problems, cardiovascular instability, extravasation, and severe agitation). Data was recorded via a clinical proforma and was analyzed by SPSS software version 25. All numerical data were expressed in mean±SD forms, and frequency was determined for qualitative baseline data. Secondary outcomes were tested through the χ2 test, A p-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Levetiracetam terminated seizures in 94% of children compared to 77% in those treated with phenytoin. The mean time to seizure termination was 19.94±3.76 minutes for the LEV Group as compared to 23.791±9.1 min for the PHT group. (p=0.046). Regarding safety, a profile study shows LEV has fewer and less severe side effects compared to Phenytoin.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Levetiracetam is a safe, well-tolerated, and effective treatment as a second-line antiepileptic drug in the management of status epilepticus.</p>","PeriodicalId":87479,"journal":{"name":"Microbe (Washington, D.C.)","volume":"5 1","pages":"410-414"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbe (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55519/JAMC-03-11897","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Status Epilepticus (SE) is a life-threatening neurological emergency requiring appropriate therapy to terminate seizure activity. SE is managed with supportive measures and ultra-short-acting benzodiazepines. However, limited data is available in the paediatric population regarding the next best option when this fails. This study aimed at finding new data to recommend levetiracetam or phenytoin as the second-line option.

Methods: One hundred and thirty-seven patients with status epilepticus were randomized into two groups; group-I was given IV Levetiracetam (LEV) at 20 mg/kg/dose over 5 minutes followed by a maintenance dose of 20mg/kg/dose BID, whereas Group II received phenytoin at 20mg/kg IV loading dose followed by a maintenance dose of 5-8 mg/kg/day divided BID. The primary outcome was seizure cessation, defined as the termination of the apparent convulsion 30 min after the administration of phenytoin or levetiracetam. Secondary outcomes were the use of different anti-convulsants for continued management, admittance to critical treatment, and severe adverse events (including mortality, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, rash, airway problems, cardiovascular instability, extravasation, and severe agitation). Data was recorded via a clinical proforma and was analyzed by SPSS software version 25. All numerical data were expressed in mean±SD forms, and frequency was determined for qualitative baseline data. Secondary outcomes were tested through the χ2 test, A p-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistical significance.

Results: Levetiracetam terminated seizures in 94% of children compared to 77% in those treated with phenytoin. The mean time to seizure termination was 19.94±3.76 minutes for the LEV Group as compared to 23.791±9.1 min for the PHT group. (p=0.046). Regarding safety, a profile study shows LEV has fewer and less severe side effects compared to Phenytoin.

Conclusions: Levetiracetam is a safe, well-tolerated, and effective treatment as a second-line antiepileptic drug in the management of status epilepticus.

左乙拉西坦与苯妥英作为二线抗癫痫药物在治疗儿童苯二氮卓难治性癫痫状态中的疗效对比
背景:癫痫状态(SE)是一种危及生命的神经系统急症,需要适当的治疗来终止癫痫发作活动。癫痫状态可通过支持性措施和超短效苯二氮卓类药物来控制。然而,在儿科人群中,当这些措施失败时,关于下一个最佳选择的数据非常有限。本研究旨在寻找新的数据,推荐将左乙拉西坦或苯妥英作为二线选择:137名癫痫状态患者被随机分为两组:第一组静脉注射左乙拉西坦(LEV),剂量为20毫克/千克/次,每次5分钟,然后维持剂量为20毫克/千克/次,每天两次;第二组静脉注射苯妥英,剂量为20毫克/千克,然后维持剂量为5-8毫克/千克/次,每天两次。主要结果是癫痫发作停止,即服用苯妥英或左乙拉西坦 30 分钟后明显抽搐停止。次要结果是使用不同的抗惊厥药进行持续治疗、接受重症治疗和严重不良事件(包括死亡率、史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征、皮疹、气道问题、心血管不稳定、外渗和严重躁动)。数据通过临床表格记录,并通过 SPSS 软件 25 版进行分析。所有数字数据均以均数±SD 表示,定性基线数据则以频率表示。次要结果采用χ2检验,P值≤0.05为差异有统计学意义:94%的儿童服用左乙拉西坦后终止了癫痫发作,而服用苯妥英的儿童只有77%。左乙拉西坦组终止癫痫发作的平均时间为(19.94±3.76)分钟,而 PHT 组为(23.791±9.1)分钟(P=0.046)。(p=0.046).关于安全性,一项资料研究显示,与苯妥英相比,左乙拉西坦的副作用更少、更轻:作为治疗癫痫状态的二线抗癫痫药物,左乙拉西坦是一种安全、耐受性良好且有效的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信