Investigating the immersion of inquiry in lecture in improving students’ understanding about scientific inquiry

M. Muntholib, S. Rahayu, N. Alsulami, M. Rosli
{"title":"Investigating the immersion of inquiry in lecture in improving students’ understanding about scientific inquiry","authors":"M. Muntholib, S. Rahayu, N. Alsulami, M. Rosli","doi":"10.21831/cp.v41i3.33020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to examine the extent to which scientific inquiry procedures during a lecture improvelead to an improvement in students’ understanding of scientific inquiry. The study implemented a one-group pretest-posttest design. Participants were 53 first-year students from the Chemistry Department atin a public university in Malang Ccity. Students’ understandings of scientific inquiry were assessed before and after the instruction using the Views About Scientific Inquiry (VASI) questionnaire. TThe participants’ responses were analysed descriptively and classified into three categories: informed, partially informed, and naïve, with Cohen’s inter-rater reliability value of 0.81.he participants’ responses were analysed descriptively and classified into three categories, namely informed, partially informed, and naïve views with Cohen’s inter-rater reliability value of 0.81. The results showed that (1) before treatment, students' understanding of scientific inquiry was at the level of partially informed and naïve, and (2) the immersion of scientific inquiry procedures in lectures improved students' understanding of scientific inquiry with the improved strength of Cohen's d-effect size was 1.10 (much larger than the typical category) or average normalized gain was 0.3 (medium category).","PeriodicalId":17767,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v41i3.33020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the extent to which scientific inquiry procedures during a lecture improvelead to an improvement in students’ understanding of scientific inquiry. The study implemented a one-group pretest-posttest design. Participants were 53 first-year students from the Chemistry Department atin a public university in Malang Ccity. Students’ understandings of scientific inquiry were assessed before and after the instruction using the Views About Scientific Inquiry (VASI) questionnaire. TThe participants’ responses were analysed descriptively and classified into three categories: informed, partially informed, and naïve, with Cohen’s inter-rater reliability value of 0.81.he participants’ responses were analysed descriptively and classified into three categories, namely informed, partially informed, and naïve views with Cohen’s inter-rater reliability value of 0.81. The results showed that (1) before treatment, students' understanding of scientific inquiry was at the level of partially informed and naïve, and (2) the immersion of scientific inquiry procedures in lectures improved students' understanding of scientific inquiry with the improved strength of Cohen's d-effect size was 1.10 (much larger than the typical category) or average normalized gain was 0.3 (medium category).
探究课堂探究的沉浸性在提高学生对科学探究的理解中的作用
本研究旨在考察讲座期间的科学探究过程在多大程度上促进了学生对科学探究的理解。该研究采用一组前测后测设计。参与者是来自玛琅市一所公立大学化学系的53名一年级学生。使用科学探究观(VASI)问卷评估学生在教学前后对科学探究的理解。参与者的反应被描述性地分析并分为三类:知情,部分知情和naïve,科恩的评级间信度值为0.81。对参与者的回答进行描述性分析,并将其分为三类,即知情,部分知情和naïve观点,科恩的评级间信度值为0.81。结果表明:(1)治疗前,学生对科学探究的理解处于部分了解和naïve的水平;(2)科学探究过程沉浸在讲座中提高了学生对科学探究的理解,科恩d效应的提高强度为1.10(远远大于典型类别)或平均归一化增益为0.3(中等类别)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信