Investigating the Relationship between Critical Thinking Disposition and Teaching Style of Faculty Members in Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences

A. Shakurnia, H. Elhampour, M. Oraki Kohshour, S. Izadpanah
{"title":"Investigating the Relationship between Critical Thinking Disposition and Teaching Style of Faculty Members in Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences","authors":"A. Shakurnia, H. Elhampour, M. Oraki Kohshour, S. Izadpanah","doi":"10.52547/rme.14.1.44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction : The critical thinking disposition and related factors as one of the professional competencies of faculty members have attracted many educational researchers᾽ attention. Teaching styles are also effective factors in developing skills and tendency of critical thinking that can be effective in strengthening critical thinking. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the level of critical thinking disposition and teaching style in faculty members of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences . Methods: This is a descriptive- correlational study. The study population was all professors of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences in the year 2020. Based on Morgan's table, 205 people were selected by stratified proportional method and evaluated using Ricketts Critical Thinking disposition and Grasha-Richmann Teaching Style Questionnaires. Data were analyzed using multiple regression tests and Pearson correlation coefficient through SPSS. Results: The mean score of critical thinking disposition in participants was higher than average (123.03±13.84), and the preferential teaching style was formal authority (27.9%) and expert style (23.8%). There was a significant relationship between the critical thinking disposition and the faculty's teaching style (p<0.05). The highest multivariate correlation coefficient was formal authority teaching style (0.692), and the lowest was observed in the delegator teaching style (0.561) (p<0.001). The most correlation and predictor was the formal authority teaching style (48%), and the lowest was the delegator teaching style (31%). Conclusion: Findings showed that there is a relationship between the critical thinking disposition and teaching style and the critical thinking disposition is a predictor variable for teaching style. By holding educational programs on critical thinking disposition and teaching styles, appropriate educational conditions can be provided for the development of critical thinking disposition in faculty members and students.","PeriodicalId":75518,"journal":{"name":"Annual Conference on Research in Medical Education. Conference on Research in Medical Education","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Conference on Research in Medical Education. Conference on Research in Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/rme.14.1.44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction : The critical thinking disposition and related factors as one of the professional competencies of faculty members have attracted many educational researchers᾽ attention. Teaching styles are also effective factors in developing skills and tendency of critical thinking that can be effective in strengthening critical thinking. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the level of critical thinking disposition and teaching style in faculty members of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences . Methods: This is a descriptive- correlational study. The study population was all professors of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences in the year 2020. Based on Morgan's table, 205 people were selected by stratified proportional method and evaluated using Ricketts Critical Thinking disposition and Grasha-Richmann Teaching Style Questionnaires. Data were analyzed using multiple regression tests and Pearson correlation coefficient through SPSS. Results: The mean score of critical thinking disposition in participants was higher than average (123.03±13.84), and the preferential teaching style was formal authority (27.9%) and expert style (23.8%). There was a significant relationship between the critical thinking disposition and the faculty's teaching style (p<0.05). The highest multivariate correlation coefficient was formal authority teaching style (0.692), and the lowest was observed in the delegator teaching style (0.561) (p<0.001). The most correlation and predictor was the formal authority teaching style (48%), and the lowest was the delegator teaching style (31%). Conclusion: Findings showed that there is a relationship between the critical thinking disposition and teaching style and the critical thinking disposition is a predictor variable for teaching style. By holding educational programs on critical thinking disposition and teaching styles, appropriate educational conditions can be provided for the development of critical thinking disposition in faculty members and students.
阿瓦士君迪沙普尔医科大学教师批判性思维倾向与教学风格关系的调查研究
导读:作为教师专业能力之一的批判性思维倾向及其相关因素引起了许多教育研究者的关注。教学风格也是培养批判性思维技能和倾向的有效因素,可以有效地加强批判性思维。摘要本研究旨在探讨阿瓦士君迪沙普尔医科大学教师批判性思维倾向水平与教学风格的关系。方法:采用描述性相关研究。研究对象为2020年Ahvaz Jundishapur医学科学大学的教授。根据Morgan的表格,采用分层比例法选取205人,采用Ricketts批判性思维倾向和Grasha-Richmann教学风格问卷进行评估。数据分析采用SPSS多元回归检验和Pearson相关系数分析。结果:被试的批判性思维倾向平均分(123.03±13.84)高于平均水平,教学风格以形式权威(27.9%)和专家风格(23.8%)为主。批判性思维倾向与教师教学风格有显著相关(p<0.05)。多元相关系数最高的是正式权威型教学风格(0.692),最低的是委托型教学风格(0.561)(p<0.001)。相关性和预测因子最高的是正式权威教学风格(48%),最低的是委托教学风格(31%)。结论:研究结果表明,批判性思维倾向与教学风格存在相关关系,批判性思维倾向是教学风格的预测变量。通过开展批判性思维倾向和教学风格的教育项目,可以为教师和学生批判性思维倾向的发展提供适当的教育条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信