Rationality transforming in the digital age

IF 2.2 3区 工程技术 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
N. Ravochkin
{"title":"Rationality transforming in the digital age","authors":"N. Ravochkin","doi":"10.18254/s207751800019817-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the features of the transformation of rationality in the realities of the digital age. The nature of three variants of rationality is presented - classical, non-classical and post-non-classical. The understanding is substantiated, the essential features are shown, and the author's definition of the rationality of the digital era is proposed. The complex impact of megatrends on the understanding of the world by actors and its subsequent transformations is highlighted. The contextual and situational elements are identified as the leading characteristics of the new rationality. Emphasis is placed on the impossibility of replicating \"once\" effective mental constructs, which inevitably implies the adaptation of the ideas of social transformations to new realities and current parameters. The authors demonstrated the transition of rationality of the digital age from the field of theory to applied purpose. The expediency of using the principles of the network approach by various actors is emphasized. A high degree of influence of media and other advanced technologies is noted. Based on practical examples from the political sphere of public life, the vectors of transformation of rationality in the realities of the digital world are determined: «visuality», «hedonism», «pragmatism». In conclusion, generalizations are given that constitute the theoretical and methodological basis.","PeriodicalId":51498,"journal":{"name":"Jasss-The Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jasss-The Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18254/s207751800019817-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article discusses the features of the transformation of rationality in the realities of the digital age. The nature of three variants of rationality is presented - classical, non-classical and post-non-classical. The understanding is substantiated, the essential features are shown, and the author's definition of the rationality of the digital era is proposed. The complex impact of megatrends on the understanding of the world by actors and its subsequent transformations is highlighted. The contextual and situational elements are identified as the leading characteristics of the new rationality. Emphasis is placed on the impossibility of replicating "once" effective mental constructs, which inevitably implies the adaptation of the ideas of social transformations to new realities and current parameters. The authors demonstrated the transition of rationality of the digital age from the field of theory to applied purpose. The expediency of using the principles of the network approach by various actors is emphasized. A high degree of influence of media and other advanced technologies is noted. Based on practical examples from the political sphere of public life, the vectors of transformation of rationality in the realities of the digital world are determined: «visuality», «hedonism», «pragmatism». In conclusion, generalizations are given that constitute the theoretical and methodological basis.
理性在数字时代的转变
本文论述了数字时代现实中理性转换的特征。提出了理性的三种变体的本质——古典、非古典和后非古典。论证了这一认识,揭示了其本质特征,提出了作者对数字时代合理性的定义。本书强调了大趋势对行动者对世界的理解及其随后的变革的复杂影响。语境因素和情境因素被认为是新理性的主要特征。重点是不可能复制“曾经”有效的心理结构,这不可避免地意味着使社会变革的思想适应新的现实和当前的参数。作者论证了数字时代的理性从理论领域到应用目的的转变。强调了各种行为者使用网络方法原则的便利性。注意到媒体和其他先进技术的高度影响。基于公共生活的政治领域的实际例子,确定了数字世界现实中理性转化的向量:“视觉性”、“享乐主义”、“实用主义”。最后,给出了构成理论和方法基础的概括。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
9.50%
发文量
16
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation is an interdisciplinary journal for the exploration and understanding of social processes by means of computer simulation. Since its first issue in 1998, it has been a world-wide leading reference for readers interested in social simulation and the application of computer simulation in the social sciences. Original research papers and critical reviews on all aspects of social simulation and agent societies that fall within the journal"s objective to further the exploration and understanding of social processes by means of computer simulation are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信