A Field in Formation: Intersectionality Is/As Social Justice

IF 0.1 4区 艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION
Leanne Weeks
{"title":"A Field in Formation: Intersectionality Is/As Social Justice","authors":"Leanne Weeks","doi":"10.13110/criticism.63.4.0441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Criticism 63.4_06_Weeks.indd Page 441 17/11/21 12:28 pm Criticism Fall 2021, Vol. 63, No. 4, pp. 441–444. ISSN 0011-1589. doi: 10.13110/criticism.63.4.0441 © 2021 by Wayne State University Press, Detroit, Michigan 48201-1309 Social theory in and of itself can be a daunting scholarly enterprise— not least when framed within and through critical positionalities. While intersectionality at first glance may seem to be a relatively approachable social theory, especially given its increasing popularity in scholarly and popular modalities, it has proven to be substantively rich, complex, and consequential. In Intersectionality as Critical Social Theory, Patricia Hill Collins, preeminent scholar of intersectionality, takes on the ambitious project of positioning intersectionality as a critical social theory and illuminating the productive possibilities for intersectionality both epistemologically and methodologically, especially as a social justice project. By positioning intersectionality, Collins simultaneously contextualizes critical social theory and charts critical social theory’s potential for scholars invested in activism and social justice who might otherwise be located in fields that self-identify and/or are identified as critical. Collins politically situates and consequently politicizes intersectionality. Rather than catering to the academy’s impetus to privilege so-called objective knowledge, Collins argues that critical social theory and concurrently intersectionality can only be critical insofar as their ethical commitments to social justice. Knowledge operating under the guise of neutral objectivity not only gets conferred A FIELD IN FORMATION: INTERSECTIONALITY IS/AS SOCIAL JUSTICE Lee Y. Weeks Jr.","PeriodicalId":42834,"journal":{"name":"FILM CRITICISM","volume":"18 1","pages":"441 - 444"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FILM CRITICISM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13110/criticism.63.4.0441","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Criticism 63.4_06_Weeks.indd Page 441 17/11/21 12:28 pm Criticism Fall 2021, Vol. 63, No. 4, pp. 441–444. ISSN 0011-1589. doi: 10.13110/criticism.63.4.0441 © 2021 by Wayne State University Press, Detroit, Michigan 48201-1309 Social theory in and of itself can be a daunting scholarly enterprise— not least when framed within and through critical positionalities. While intersectionality at first glance may seem to be a relatively approachable social theory, especially given its increasing popularity in scholarly and popular modalities, it has proven to be substantively rich, complex, and consequential. In Intersectionality as Critical Social Theory, Patricia Hill Collins, preeminent scholar of intersectionality, takes on the ambitious project of positioning intersectionality as a critical social theory and illuminating the productive possibilities for intersectionality both epistemologically and methodologically, especially as a social justice project. By positioning intersectionality, Collins simultaneously contextualizes critical social theory and charts critical social theory’s potential for scholars invested in activism and social justice who might otherwise be located in fields that self-identify and/or are identified as critical. Collins politically situates and consequently politicizes intersectionality. Rather than catering to the academy’s impetus to privilege so-called objective knowledge, Collins argues that critical social theory and concurrently intersectionality can only be critical insofar as their ethical commitments to social justice. Knowledge operating under the guise of neutral objectivity not only gets conferred A FIELD IN FORMATION: INTERSECTIONALITY IS/AS SOCIAL JUSTICE Lee Y. Weeks Jr.
信息领域:交叉性即社会正义
63.4 _06_weeks批评。第441页,21年11月17日下午12:28批评秋季2021,第63卷,第4号,第441 - 444页。ISSN 0011 - 1589。doi: 10.13110/critic .63.4.0441©2021 by Wayne State University Press, Detroit, Michigan 48201-1309社会理论本身可能是一项艰巨的学术事业-尤其是在批判性立场内和通过批判性立场框架时。虽然交叉性乍一看似乎是一个相对容易接近的社会理论,特别是考虑到它在学术和流行模式中的日益普及,它已被证明是实质性的丰富,复杂和重要的。在《作为批判社会理论的交叉性》一书中,杰出的交叉性学者帕特里夏·希尔·柯林斯(Patricia Hill Collins)雄心勃勃地将交叉性定位为一种批判社会理论,并在认识论和方法论上阐明了交叉性的生产可能性,特别是作为一种社会正义项目。通过定位交叉性,柯林斯同时将批判社会理论置于语境中,并描绘出批判社会理论对从事行动主义和社会正义的学者的潜力,否则这些学者可能位于自我认同和/或被认同为批判性的领域。柯林斯在政治上定位并因此将交叉性政治化。柯林斯并没有迎合学术界对所谓客观知识的特权,而是认为,批判性社会理论和同时存在的交叉性只有在它们对社会正义的道德承诺中才具有批判性。在中立客观的幌子下运作的知识不仅被授予信息领域:交叉性是/作为社会正义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
FILM CRITICISM
FILM CRITICISM FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Film Criticism is a peer-reviewed, online publication whose aim is to bring together scholarship in the field of cinema and media studies in order to present the finest work in this area, foregrounding textual criticism as a primary value. Our readership is academic, although we strive to publish material that is both accessible to undergraduates and engaging to established scholars. With over 40 years of continuous publication, Film Criticism is the third oldest academic film journal in the United States. We have published work by such international scholars as Dudley Andrew, David Bordwell, David Cook, Andrew Horton, Ann Kaplan, Marcia Landy, Peter Lehman, Janet Staiger, and Robin Wood. Equally important, FC continues to present work from emerging generations of film and media scholars representing multiple critical, cultural and theoretical perspectives. Film Criticism is an open access academic journal that allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, and link to the full texts of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose except where otherwise noted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信