{"title":"Book Reviews : The Superfluous Anarchist: Albert Jay Nock. By MICHAEL WRESZIN. (Providence: Brown University Press, 1972. PP. xi, 196. $8.50.)","authors":"Stephen L. Wasby","doi":"10.1177/106591297202500421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"as &dquo;any organization that requires prospective candidates to acquire a college education in order to be eligible for recruitment ... ,&dquo; do not create confidence: neither the military nor the foreign service requires a college degree. Except for a distrust of communism and of disarmament, it is not made clear in what way the beliefs of the military are more &dquo;hard-line&dquo; than their counterparts in diplomacy. Thus the chapter on &dquo;Foreign Policy Beliefs&dquo; is doubly disappointing: (a) it does not fulfill the promise of the book’s title, and (b) the reader is left totally in the dark as to what a &dquo;hard-line&dquo; policy might be, let us say, toward Japan, or Bangladesh, or Rhodesia.","PeriodicalId":83314,"journal":{"name":"The Western political quarterly","volume":"4 1","pages":"796 - 798"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1972-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Western political quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/106591297202500421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
as &dquo;any organization that requires prospective candidates to acquire a college education in order to be eligible for recruitment ... ,&dquo; do not create confidence: neither the military nor the foreign service requires a college degree. Except for a distrust of communism and of disarmament, it is not made clear in what way the beliefs of the military are more &dquo;hard-line&dquo; than their counterparts in diplomacy. Thus the chapter on &dquo;Foreign Policy Beliefs&dquo; is doubly disappointing: (a) it does not fulfill the promise of the book’s title, and (b) the reader is left totally in the dark as to what a &dquo;hard-line&dquo; policy might be, let us say, toward Japan, or Bangladesh, or Rhodesia.