Neurointerventional Treatment of Vein of Galen Malformation (VGM): A Structured Review with a Proposal for the Comparison of Outcome Quality

F. Brassel, M. Schlunz-Hendann, M. Scholz, Robert Lucaciu, Chunfu Fan, V. Koch, D. Grieb, F. Brevis Nunez, S. Schwarz, C. Sommer
{"title":"Neurointerventional Treatment of Vein of Galen Malformation (VGM): A Structured Review with a Proposal for the Comparison of Outcome Quality","authors":"F. Brassel, M. Schlunz-Hendann, M. Scholz, Robert Lucaciu, Chunfu Fan, V. Koch, D. Grieb, F. Brevis Nunez, S. Schwarz, C. Sommer","doi":"10.3390/jvd2020018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Vein of Galen malformation (VGM) is a congenital intracranial vascular anomaly consisting of arteriovenous fistulas and/or malformations between various arterial feeders and the median prosencephalic vein of Markowski (MPV). Despite its rare occurrence, VGM is of particular clinical relevance, as the excessive intracranial shunt volume leads to high mortality without appropriate treatment. Methods: The objective of this article is to review the published data on neurointerventional treatment and compare outcome quality in the included studies. Eight studies were included and synthesized. One study was multicentric and the rest were retrospective monocentric (level 4 evidence studies according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine). Results: The total number of included patients was 480 and patient age ranged from 1 day to 18 years. Mild or severe heart failure, hydrocephalus, and other reasons led to the indication for neurointerventional treatment, which was performed in all studies in the form of embolization. Under consideration of the introduced semiquantitative multidimensional scoring system, the highest total score, i.e., the best outcome quality, was found for the study “Houston” 2002–2018 (19 points) and the study “Duisburg” 2001–2010 (19 points). Conclusions: Neurointerventional treatment represents the essential pillar in the interdisciplinary management of patients with VGM, although standardization is lacking—based on the results of the structured review. As complementary treatments, pediatric critical care is mandatory and includes medical hemodynamic stabilization.","PeriodicalId":74009,"journal":{"name":"Journal of vascular diseases","volume":"6 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of vascular diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jvd2020018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Vein of Galen malformation (VGM) is a congenital intracranial vascular anomaly consisting of arteriovenous fistulas and/or malformations between various arterial feeders and the median prosencephalic vein of Markowski (MPV). Despite its rare occurrence, VGM is of particular clinical relevance, as the excessive intracranial shunt volume leads to high mortality without appropriate treatment. Methods: The objective of this article is to review the published data on neurointerventional treatment and compare outcome quality in the included studies. Eight studies were included and synthesized. One study was multicentric and the rest were retrospective monocentric (level 4 evidence studies according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine). Results: The total number of included patients was 480 and patient age ranged from 1 day to 18 years. Mild or severe heart failure, hydrocephalus, and other reasons led to the indication for neurointerventional treatment, which was performed in all studies in the form of embolization. Under consideration of the introduced semiquantitative multidimensional scoring system, the highest total score, i.e., the best outcome quality, was found for the study “Houston” 2002–2018 (19 points) and the study “Duisburg” 2001–2010 (19 points). Conclusions: Neurointerventional treatment represents the essential pillar in the interdisciplinary management of patients with VGM, although standardization is lacking—based on the results of the structured review. As complementary treatments, pediatric critical care is mandatory and includes medical hemodynamic stabilization.
盖伦静脉畸形(VGM)的神经介入治疗:一项结构回顾和结果质量比较建议
背景:盖伦静脉畸形(VGM)是一种先天性颅内血管异常,由动静脉瘘和/或各种动脉喂食器和马可夫斯基前脑正中静脉(MPV)之间的畸形组成。尽管发生罕见,但VGM具有特殊的临床意义,因为颅内分流容量过大会导致高死亡率,如果没有适当的治疗。方法:本文的目的是回顾已发表的有关神经介入治疗的资料,并比较纳入研究的结果质量。纳入并综合了8项研究。一项研究为多中心研究,其余为回顾性单中心研究(牛津循证医学中心的4级证据研究)。结果:纳入患者480例,年龄1 ~ 18岁。轻度或重度心力衰竭、脑积水等原因导致神经介入治疗指征,所有研究均以栓塞的形式进行。考虑引入的半定量多维评分系统,“休斯顿”研究2002-2018(19分)和“杜伊斯堡”研究2001-2010(19分)的总分最高,即结果质量最好。结论:神经介入治疗是VGM患者跨学科管理的重要支柱,尽管缺乏标准化——基于结构化综述的结果。作为补充治疗,儿科重症监护是强制性的,包括医疗血液动力学稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信