La construction de compétences d’étudiants en soins infirmiers lors d’un apprentissage par simulation : étude au cours d’un exercice de prise en charge d’un arrêt cardiorespiratoire

IF 0.3 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
S. Hardy-Massard , A. Heckenauer , L. Gandon
{"title":"La construction de compétences d’étudiants en soins infirmiers lors d’un apprentissage par simulation : étude au cours d’un exercice de prise en charge d’un arrêt cardiorespiratoire","authors":"S. Hardy-Massard ,&nbsp;A. Heckenauer ,&nbsp;L. Gandon","doi":"10.1016/j.pto.2021.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Our study focuses on the professionalization process in nursing students. More specifically, it aims to understand how each step of simulation in nursing education contributes to skills development in nursing students. In total, forty-seven students participated in this study. All the learners were first year students and answered anonymously, at the four stages of the research process, to a questionnaire consisting of six questions to measure their opinion on the acquisition of skills during a learning session based on simulation. Each question was built on one of the six forms of knowledge defined by <span>Le Boterf, 1997</span>, <span>Le Boterf, 2007</span>, <span>Le Boterf, 2011</span> in his theoretical model of competence. The results show that each stage of the simulation training significantly modifies the students’ opinion on the different forms of knowledge they have acquired. Moreover, the debriefing, that is an essential part of simulation learning, proves to be the most complex stage given the multiple psycho-cognitive and emotional processes involved.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43191,"journal":{"name":"Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations","volume":"27 3","pages":"Pages 189-202"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1420253021000455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our study focuses on the professionalization process in nursing students. More specifically, it aims to understand how each step of simulation in nursing education contributes to skills development in nursing students. In total, forty-seven students participated in this study. All the learners were first year students and answered anonymously, at the four stages of the research process, to a questionnaire consisting of six questions to measure their opinion on the acquisition of skills during a learning session based on simulation. Each question was built on one of the six forms of knowledge defined by Le Boterf, 1997, Le Boterf, 2007, Le Boterf, 2011 in his theoretical model of competence. The results show that each stage of the simulation training significantly modifies the students’ opinion on the different forms of knowledge they have acquired. Moreover, the debriefing, that is an essential part of simulation learning, proves to be the most complex stage given the multiple psycho-cognitive and emotional processes involved.

模拟学习中护理学生技能的构建:心肺骤停管理练习中的研究
本研究聚焦护生职业化过程。更具体地说,它旨在了解护理教育中模拟的每一步如何有助于护理学生的技能发展。总共有47名学生参加了这项研究。所有的学习者都是一年级的学生,在研究过程的四个阶段匿名回答一份由六个问题组成的问卷,以衡量他们对在基于模拟的学习过程中获得技能的看法。每个问题都建立在Le Boterf(1997)、Le Boterf(2007)和Le Boterf(2011)在其能力理论模型中定义的六种知识形式之一的基础上。结果表明,模拟训练的每个阶段都显著地改变了学生对他们所获得的不同形式知识的看法。此外,汇报是模拟学习的重要组成部分,由于涉及多种心理认知和情感过程,它被证明是最复杂的阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
27
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信