Micro-cost analysis of single-use vs. reusable cystoscopy in a single-payer healthcare system.

IF 11.5 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Jaehoon Kim, Bruce Gao, Naeem Bhojani, Kevin C Zorn, Bilal Chughtai, Dean S Elterman
{"title":"Micro-cost analysis of single-use vs. reusable cystoscopy in a single-payer healthcare system.","authors":"Jaehoon Kim, Bruce Gao, Naeem Bhojani, Kevin C Zorn, Bilal Chughtai, Dean S Elterman","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.7828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Single-use flexible diagnostic cystoscopy has recently been developed with comparable functionality to reusable cystoscopes. Prior studies have demonstrated considerable upfront costs of reusable cystoscopy. The objective of this study was to compare costs of reusable cystoscopy to single-use cystoscopy in a single-payer, socialized healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective micro-cost analysis of reusable cystoscopy in a combined inpatient and outpatient setting at a single institution was performed. The cost analysis was divided into capital, maintenance, reprocessing, and labor. Annual costs were averaged over two fiscal years. Costs were amortized over five- and 10-year bases as appropriate. The results were compared to theoretical costs of single-use cystoscopes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 3415 annual average cystoscopy cases with 171 cases per reusable cystoscope. The capital, maintenance, reprocessing, and labor costs of reusable cystoscopy were $96 000, $99 867, $247 855, and $65 317, respectively. The total annual costs per case for reusable and single-use cystoscopy were $149.06 and $245.57, respectively. The costs of reusable cystoscopy decreased with the number of procedures per year and intersected the costs of single-use cystoscopes at 1265 procedures per year. All costs were calculated in Canadian dollars ($CAD).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The cost-effectiveness of reusable cystoscopes is dependent on cystoscopy volume due to considerable upfront costs. Single-use cystoscopes are more cost-effective if the total number of cases performed is less than 1265 per year. Additional investigation into the cost-effectiveness of single-use cystoscopes as supplements in the outpatient setting or primary endoscopes in inpatient/emergency settings should be performed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47771,"journal":{"name":"Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and Practice","volume":"1 1","pages":"346-350"},"PeriodicalIF":11.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9565074/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.7828","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Single-use flexible diagnostic cystoscopy has recently been developed with comparable functionality to reusable cystoscopes. Prior studies have demonstrated considerable upfront costs of reusable cystoscopy. The objective of this study was to compare costs of reusable cystoscopy to single-use cystoscopy in a single-payer, socialized healthcare system.

Methods: A retrospective micro-cost analysis of reusable cystoscopy in a combined inpatient and outpatient setting at a single institution was performed. The cost analysis was divided into capital, maintenance, reprocessing, and labor. Annual costs were averaged over two fiscal years. Costs were amortized over five- and 10-year bases as appropriate. The results were compared to theoretical costs of single-use cystoscopes.

Results: There were 3415 annual average cystoscopy cases with 171 cases per reusable cystoscope. The capital, maintenance, reprocessing, and labor costs of reusable cystoscopy were $96 000, $99 867, $247 855, and $65 317, respectively. The total annual costs per case for reusable and single-use cystoscopy were $149.06 and $245.57, respectively. The costs of reusable cystoscopy decreased with the number of procedures per year and intersected the costs of single-use cystoscopes at 1265 procedures per year. All costs were calculated in Canadian dollars ($CAD).

Conclusions: The cost-effectiveness of reusable cystoscopes is dependent on cystoscopy volume due to considerable upfront costs. Single-use cystoscopes are more cost-effective if the total number of cases performed is less than 1265 per year. Additional investigation into the cost-effectiveness of single-use cystoscopes as supplements in the outpatient setting or primary endoscopes in inpatient/emergency settings should be performed.

单一付费医疗系统中一次性与可重复使用膀胱镜检查的微观成本分析。
简介:一次性使用的柔性膀胱诊断镜最近得到开发,其功能与可重复使用的膀胱镜相当。先前的研究表明,可重复使用膀胱镜的前期成本相当高。本研究的目的是比较可重复使用膀胱镜和一次性膀胱镜在单方付费的社会化医疗系统中的成本:方法:在一家医疗机构的住院和门诊环境中,对可重复使用的膀胱镜检查进行了回顾性微观成本分析。成本分析分为资本、维护、再处理和人工。年成本为两个财政年度的平均值。根据情况,成本按 5 年和 10 年摊销。结果与一次性膀胱镜的理论成本进行了比较:结果:平均每年有 3415 个膀胱镜检查病例,每个可重复使用膀胱镜检查 171 个病例。可重复使用膀胱镜的资本、维护、再处理和人工成本分别为 96 000 美元、99 867 美元、247 855 美元和 65 317 美元。可重复使用和一次性膀胱镜检查的每例年度总成本分别为 149.06 美元和 245.57 美元。可重复使用膀胱镜的成本随着每年手术次数的增加而降低,在每年进行 1265 次手术时与一次性膀胱镜的成本相交。所有成本均以加元计算:结论:可重复使用膀胱镜的成本效益取决于膀胱镜检查量,因为前期成本相当高。如果每年进行的病例总数少于 1265 例,则一次性使用膀胱镜更具成本效益。应进一步研究一次性膀胱镜在门诊环境中作为补充或在住院/急诊环境中作为主要内镜的成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
10.10%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and Practice is a peer-reviewed academic journal published on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. The journal focuses on interactive exchanges on topics of importance to the science and practice of the field. It features articles that present new ideas or different takes on existing ideas, stimulating dialogue about important issues in the field. Additionally, the journal is indexed and abstracted in Clarivate Analytics SSCI, Clarivate Analytics Web of Science, European Reference Index for the Humanities and Social Sciences (ERIH PLUS), ProQuest, PsycINFO, and Scopus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信