The Impact Areas Questionnaire (IAQ): A Music Therapy Service Evaluation Tool

Giorgos Tsiris, N. Spiro, O. Coggins, Ania Zubala
{"title":"The Impact Areas Questionnaire (IAQ): A Music Therapy Service Evaluation Tool","authors":"Giorgos Tsiris, N. Spiro, O. Coggins, Ania Zubala","doi":"10.15845/voices.v20i2.2816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Service evaluation is a professional requirement for music therapy practitioners and organisations. Yet service evaluation findings are rarely published within the professional literature, and there is limited documentation of the processes and methods of such evaluations, including the rationale, dilemmas, and challenges encountered. This is perhaps due to the perceived status, methodological weaknesses, and context-specificity of service evaluation work. Drawing on our engagement with service evaluation in diverse settings, we have become aware of its potential beyond its typical current uses in the field as well as of the need for open discussion and debate about the service evaluation tools that are available. This is where the aim of this paper lies: to introduce a service evaluation tool, the Impact Areas Questionnaire (IAQ), alongside the studies that led to its construction. Developed originally through a review of 27 individually designed service evaluation projects, this questionnaire contains a number of different impact areas. Adopting an ecological perspective, these areas refer to music therapy’s perceived impact not only on service users, but also on families/carers/friends, staff, and the organisational context in its entirety. Following its original development within Nordoff Robbins England and Wales, this questionnaire was tested in the context of Nordoff Robbins Scotland with the aim of exploring its applicability and transferability to other music therapy settings. In addition to presenting the findings of this testing, we discuss the potential use of the IAQ, which is included as an appendix to this article, in other settings and its relevance for knowledge and policy making in the field.","PeriodicalId":89868,"journal":{"name":"Volta voices","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volta voices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15845/voices.v20i2.2816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Service evaluation is a professional requirement for music therapy practitioners and organisations. Yet service evaluation findings are rarely published within the professional literature, and there is limited documentation of the processes and methods of such evaluations, including the rationale, dilemmas, and challenges encountered. This is perhaps due to the perceived status, methodological weaknesses, and context-specificity of service evaluation work. Drawing on our engagement with service evaluation in diverse settings, we have become aware of its potential beyond its typical current uses in the field as well as of the need for open discussion and debate about the service evaluation tools that are available. This is where the aim of this paper lies: to introduce a service evaluation tool, the Impact Areas Questionnaire (IAQ), alongside the studies that led to its construction. Developed originally through a review of 27 individually designed service evaluation projects, this questionnaire contains a number of different impact areas. Adopting an ecological perspective, these areas refer to music therapy’s perceived impact not only on service users, but also on families/carers/friends, staff, and the organisational context in its entirety. Following its original development within Nordoff Robbins England and Wales, this questionnaire was tested in the context of Nordoff Robbins Scotland with the aim of exploring its applicability and transferability to other music therapy settings. In addition to presenting the findings of this testing, we discuss the potential use of the IAQ, which is included as an appendix to this article, in other settings and its relevance for knowledge and policy making in the field.
影响范围问卷(IAQ):一种音乐治疗服务评估工具
服务评估是对音乐治疗从业者和组织的专业要求。然而,服务评估的结果很少在专业文献中发表,而且这种评估的过程和方法的文件也很有限,包括基本原理、困境和遇到的挑战。这可能是由于服务评估工作的感知状态、方法上的弱点和上下文特殊性。根据我们在不同环境下对服务评估的参与,我们已经意识到它在该领域典型的当前用途之外的潜力,以及对可用的服务评估工具进行公开讨论和辩论的必要性。这就是本文的目的所在:介绍一种服务评估工具,即影响区域问卷(IAQ),以及导致其构建的研究。本调查表最初是通过审查27个单独设计的服务评价项目而编制的,其中包含若干不同的影响领域。从生态学的角度来看,这些领域不仅是指音乐治疗对服务使用者的影响,而且还包括对家庭/照顾者/朋友、员工和整个组织环境的影响。在诺道夫罗宾斯英格兰和威尔士的最初发展之后,本问卷在诺道夫罗宾斯苏格兰的背景下进行了测试,目的是探索其在其他音乐治疗环境中的适用性和可转移性。除了介绍该测试的结果外,我们还讨论了室内空气质量在其他环境中的潜在用途,以及它与该领域的知识和政策制定的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书