The Relationship between Remediation and Degree Completion for Engineering and Technology Students

Sally A. Lesik, Robin S. Kalder
{"title":"The Relationship between Remediation and Degree Completion for Engineering and Technology Students","authors":"Sally A. Lesik, Robin S. Kalder","doi":"10.4018/ijqaete.2011070102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates whether students who initially began college as engineering or technology majors and who were required to participate in remedial mathematics and/or remedial English programs, were less likely to graduate with their bachelor’s degree in their fourth through seventh years, as compared to engineering and technology majors who were not required to participate in a remedial mathematics and/or remedial English programs. By using discrete-time survival analysis, findings suggest that remediation status does not appear to impact the time it takes to complete the requirements for a bachelor’s degree in engineering or technology. cause this result, perhaps the most frequently cited reason is that recent high school graduates tend to be less prepared for the academic rigors of a four-year university than students of the past decades (Bound et al., 2007; Greene & Foster, 2003; Turner, 2004). This phenomenon is occurring in large numbers in the United States, and although occurring less frequently, it is a growing problem in Europe as well (Rienties, 2008; Rienties, Tempelaar, Dijkstra, Rehm, & Gijselaers, 2008). In the United States, remedial programs are common in community colleges as well as four-year colleges and universities, and are a result of post-secondary schools’ desire to atDOI: 10.4018/ijqaete.2011070102 12 International Journal of Quality Assurance in Engineering and Technology Education, 1(2), 11-22, July-December 2011 Copyright © 2011, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited. tract students from low socio-economic status (Attewell, Lavin, Domina, & Levey, 2006; Brants & Struyven, 2009; Rienties, 2008). In Europe, the need is growing due to the increasing numbers of students completing their secondary education in one country and going on with their post-secondary education in another country, causing increased heterogeneity in these institutes of higher learning (Rienties, 2008; Rienties et al., 2008; Van der Wende, 2003). According to the Spellings Commission report (2006), a “troubling number” of incoming college students “waste time mastering English and math skills that they should have learned in high school.” This apparent lack of skills in English and mathematics is often indicated in the United States by low scores on standardized tests such as the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT), and by students’ poor performance on placement examinations. Although most colleges and universities require that incoming students take placement examinations in order to demonstrate their proficiency in mathematics and English, many students do not do well on these assessments (Bettinger & Long, 2006; National Center for Education Statistics, 2003). The result of poor performances on such standardized measures often leads to the requirement that these students enroll in remedial mathematics and/or English courses for which they do not receive credit towards graduation. Having to participate in such courses restricts their ability to enroll in college-level courses that are required for graduation (National Center for Education Statistics, 2003). Since many programs require courses that have mathematics and/or English skills courses as prerequisites, participating in such courses will likely delay the students’ entry into the required introductory courses for their programs (National Center for Education Statistics, 2003), and subsequently delays them in earning their college degree (Bettinger & Long, 2006). Remediation at the college level in the United States is widespread, with recent research indicating that at least 40% of all entering freshman are required to participate in at least one remedial course (Attewell et al., 2006). The National Center for Education Statistics (2003) reports that in the fall of 2000, 28% of students entering postsecondary education were enrolled in one or more remedial classes in reading, writing and/or mathematics (Parsad, Lewis, & Greene, 2003). The percentage of students who were enrolled in remedial mathematics was largest at 22%, with only 14% enrolled in writing and 11% enrolled in reading classes. Approximately 60% of institutions that offered remedial classes reported that, on average, students spent less than one year in remediation (Parsad et al., 2003). Although remediation in the United States has existed since the seventeen hundreds (Merisotis & Phipps, 2000), it was not until the 1960’s that numerous programs were developed at colleges and universities. In Europe, however, very few remedial programs have existed until recently. The passage of the Treaty of Bologna in 1999 gave European students the ability to pursue post-secondary education in a foreign country. As each country has the freedom to determine their own educational goals and criteria for graduation (Van der Wende, 2003), students who take advantage of this opportunity are likely to have gaps in their prior knowledge (Rienties et al., 2008) and as a consequence, European institutions have begun to offer online remediation for these students. The Spellings Commission report (2006) claims that remedial students waste time taking remedial mathematics and/or English courses, whereas other studies have found that remedial students are less likely to drop out of college once they have successfully completed these courses (Bettinger & Long, 2006). It is believed that remedial courses may increase the perseverance with which these students approach their studies. However, it has been found that remedial students take longer than non-remedial students to complete their degrees (Bettinger & Long, 2006). Although some studies have researched the time to degree completion for mathematically underprepared versus mathematically prepared students (i.e. Lesik, 2008), differences in degree completion rates for remedial and non-remedial 10 more pages are available in the full version of this document, which may be purchased using the \"Add to Cart\" button on the product's webpage: www.igi-global.com/article/relationship-between-remediationdegree-completion/55874?camid=4v1 This title is available in InfoSci-Journals, InfoSci-Journal Disciplines Engineering, Natural, and Physical Science. Recommend this product to your librarian: www.igi-global.com/e-resources/libraryrecommendation/?id=2","PeriodicalId":13684,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Qual. Assur. Eng. Technol. Educ.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Qual. Assur. Eng. Technol. Educ.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijqaete.2011070102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates whether students who initially began college as engineering or technology majors and who were required to participate in remedial mathematics and/or remedial English programs, were less likely to graduate with their bachelor’s degree in their fourth through seventh years, as compared to engineering and technology majors who were not required to participate in a remedial mathematics and/or remedial English programs. By using discrete-time survival analysis, findings suggest that remediation status does not appear to impact the time it takes to complete the requirements for a bachelor’s degree in engineering or technology. cause this result, perhaps the most frequently cited reason is that recent high school graduates tend to be less prepared for the academic rigors of a four-year university than students of the past decades (Bound et al., 2007; Greene & Foster, 2003; Turner, 2004). This phenomenon is occurring in large numbers in the United States, and although occurring less frequently, it is a growing problem in Europe as well (Rienties, 2008; Rienties, Tempelaar, Dijkstra, Rehm, & Gijselaers, 2008). In the United States, remedial programs are common in community colleges as well as four-year colleges and universities, and are a result of post-secondary schools’ desire to atDOI: 10.4018/ijqaete.2011070102 12 International Journal of Quality Assurance in Engineering and Technology Education, 1(2), 11-22, July-December 2011 Copyright © 2011, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited. tract students from low socio-economic status (Attewell, Lavin, Domina, & Levey, 2006; Brants & Struyven, 2009; Rienties, 2008). In Europe, the need is growing due to the increasing numbers of students completing their secondary education in one country and going on with their post-secondary education in another country, causing increased heterogeneity in these institutes of higher learning (Rienties, 2008; Rienties et al., 2008; Van der Wende, 2003). According to the Spellings Commission report (2006), a “troubling number” of incoming college students “waste time mastering English and math skills that they should have learned in high school.” This apparent lack of skills in English and mathematics is often indicated in the United States by low scores on standardized tests such as the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT), and by students’ poor performance on placement examinations. Although most colleges and universities require that incoming students take placement examinations in order to demonstrate their proficiency in mathematics and English, many students do not do well on these assessments (Bettinger & Long, 2006; National Center for Education Statistics, 2003). The result of poor performances on such standardized measures often leads to the requirement that these students enroll in remedial mathematics and/or English courses for which they do not receive credit towards graduation. Having to participate in such courses restricts their ability to enroll in college-level courses that are required for graduation (National Center for Education Statistics, 2003). Since many programs require courses that have mathematics and/or English skills courses as prerequisites, participating in such courses will likely delay the students’ entry into the required introductory courses for their programs (National Center for Education Statistics, 2003), and subsequently delays them in earning their college degree (Bettinger & Long, 2006). Remediation at the college level in the United States is widespread, with recent research indicating that at least 40% of all entering freshman are required to participate in at least one remedial course (Attewell et al., 2006). The National Center for Education Statistics (2003) reports that in the fall of 2000, 28% of students entering postsecondary education were enrolled in one or more remedial classes in reading, writing and/or mathematics (Parsad, Lewis, & Greene, 2003). The percentage of students who were enrolled in remedial mathematics was largest at 22%, with only 14% enrolled in writing and 11% enrolled in reading classes. Approximately 60% of institutions that offered remedial classes reported that, on average, students spent less than one year in remediation (Parsad et al., 2003). Although remediation in the United States has existed since the seventeen hundreds (Merisotis & Phipps, 2000), it was not until the 1960’s that numerous programs were developed at colleges and universities. In Europe, however, very few remedial programs have existed until recently. The passage of the Treaty of Bologna in 1999 gave European students the ability to pursue post-secondary education in a foreign country. As each country has the freedom to determine their own educational goals and criteria for graduation (Van der Wende, 2003), students who take advantage of this opportunity are likely to have gaps in their prior knowledge (Rienties et al., 2008) and as a consequence, European institutions have begun to offer online remediation for these students. The Spellings Commission report (2006) claims that remedial students waste time taking remedial mathematics and/or English courses, whereas other studies have found that remedial students are less likely to drop out of college once they have successfully completed these courses (Bettinger & Long, 2006). It is believed that remedial courses may increase the perseverance with which these students approach their studies. However, it has been found that remedial students take longer than non-remedial students to complete their degrees (Bettinger & Long, 2006). Although some studies have researched the time to degree completion for mathematically underprepared versus mathematically prepared students (i.e. Lesik, 2008), differences in degree completion rates for remedial and non-remedial 10 more pages are available in the full version of this document, which may be purchased using the "Add to Cart" button on the product's webpage: www.igi-global.com/article/relationship-between-remediationdegree-completion/55874?camid=4v1 This title is available in InfoSci-Journals, InfoSci-Journal Disciplines Engineering, Natural, and Physical Science. Recommend this product to your librarian: www.igi-global.com/e-resources/libraryrecommendation/?id=2
工科学生补习与学位完成的关系
这项研究调查的是,与不需要参加数学和/或英语补习课程的工程和技术专业的学生相比,最初作为工程或技术专业的学生进入大学并被要求参加数学和/或英语补习课程的学生,是否更不可能在第四年到第七年获得学士学位。通过使用离散时间生存分析,研究结果表明,补救状态似乎并不影响完成工程或技术学士学位所需的时间。造成这一结果的原因,也许最常被引用的原因是,与过去几十年的学生相比,最近的高中毕业生往往对四年制大学的学术严谨性准备不足(Bound等人,2007;Greene & Foster, 2003;特纳,2004)。这种现象在美国大量发生,虽然发生的频率较低,但在欧洲也是一个日益严重的问题(Rienties, 2008;Rienties, Tempelaar, Dijkstra, Rehm, & Gijselaers, 2008)。在美国,补习课程在社区学院以及四年制学院和大学都很常见,这是中学后学校希望达到的目标。12国际工程技术教育质量保证学报,1(2),11-22,2011年7月- 12月版权所有©2011,IGI Global。未经IGI Global书面许可,禁止以印刷或电子形式复制或分发。招收社会经济地位较低的学生(Attewell, Lavin, Domina, & Levey, 2006;Brants & Struyven, 2009;Rienties, 2008)。在欧洲,由于越来越多的学生在一个国家完成中等教育,并在另一个国家继续接受高等教育,导致这些高等教育机构的异质性增加,需求正在增长(Rienties, 2008;Rienties et al., 2008;Van der Wende, 2003)。根据拼写委员会2006年的报告,“数量惊人”的大学新生“浪费时间掌握本应在高中学习的英语和数学技能”。在美国,学生在学术能力测试(SAT)等标准化考试中得分低,以及在分班考试中表现不佳,往往表明他们在英语和数学方面明显缺乏技能。虽然大多数学院和大学要求新生参加分班考试,以证明他们在数学和英语方面的熟练程度,但许多学生在这些评估中做得不好(Bettinger & Long, 2006;国家教育统计中心,2003)。在这些标准化测试中表现不佳的学生往往会被要求参加数学和/或英语补习课程,而这些课程在毕业时不会获得学分。不得不参加这样的课程限制了他们参加大学水平课程的能力,而这些课程是毕业所必需的(国家教育统计中心,2003)。由于许多课程要求将数学和/或英语技能课程作为先决条件,参加这些课程可能会延迟学生进入所需的课程入门课程(国家教育统计中心,2003),并随后延迟他们获得大学学位(Bettinger & Long, 2006)。美国大学水平的补习很普遍,最近的研究表明,至少40%的大一新生被要求参加至少一门补习课程(Attewell et al., 2006)。国家教育统计中心(2003)报告说,在2000年秋季,28%的进入高等教育的学生参加了一个或多个阅读、写作和/或数学辅导班(Parsad, Lewis, & Greene, 2003)。参加数学补习班的学生比例最大,达到22%,只有14%的学生参加写作补习班,11%的学生参加阅读补习班。大约60%提供补习班的机构报告说,学生平均花在补习班上的时间不到一年(Parsad et al., 2003)。尽管补习在美国早在17世纪就存在了(Merisotis & Phipps, 2000),但直到20世纪60年代,学院和大学才开发了大量的补习项目。然而,在欧洲,直到最近才有了很少的补救方案。1999年通过的《博洛尼亚条约》(Treaty of Bologna)赋予了欧洲学生在国外接受高等教育的权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信